Truth Seeker
04-22-2002, 01:39 PM
In today's Washington Post, there's an article on "Blogs" (short for weblogs). These are free-lance pundit sites where people post commentary on various issues.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A25512-2002Apr21.html
This paragraph caught my attention.
Sullivan, who draws 75,000 unique visitors a week, says that blogs "allow you to get your fix of political opinion, arguments and gossip very quickly. It's sort of the fast food of political opinion magazines." And, he freely admits, "you're writing 1,000 words a day. You'd have to be George Orwell not to write something stupid or wrong at times."
AndrewSullivan.com turned its largest profit last month, $6,000, based on the voluntary contributions that many sites now solicit and his online book club, which gets a 15 percent cut of purchases made through a link to Amazon.com.
Of course, I don't know if this is merely loose use of language by the Post, but I do note that they use the word "profit" . . .
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A25512-2002Apr21.html
This paragraph caught my attention.
Sullivan, who draws 75,000 unique visitors a week, says that blogs "allow you to get your fix of political opinion, arguments and gossip very quickly. It's sort of the fast food of political opinion magazines." And, he freely admits, "you're writing 1,000 words a day. You'd have to be George Orwell not to write something stupid or wrong at times."
AndrewSullivan.com turned its largest profit last month, $6,000, based on the voluntary contributions that many sites now solicit and his online book club, which gets a 15 percent cut of purchases made through a link to Amazon.com.
Of course, I don't know if this is merely loose use of language by the Post, but I do note that they use the word "profit" . . .