Boyo Jim
06-28-2002, 11:17 PM
I reshelved my library a few weeks ago, and had a half-dozen or so duplicate paperbacks that I gave to my sister. Two of them really bugged her, apparently to the point that she's worried that I may be somehow disturbed.
They are what might be termed "Comic Crime" novels. Drowned Hopes by Donald Westlake, is about a large theft that the evil character plans to cover up by blowing a dam and drowning thousands of people. This is a book in his "Dortmunder" series that began with The Hot Rock, IIRC. The other, Double Whammy by Carl Hiassen, is about fraudulent bass fishing tournaments, and features an assortment of bizarre redneck and backwoods Florida characters, with some unusual deaths and injuries.
She simply cannot get any link between violence and humor. I'm not especially concerned that I'm disturbed (but I pobably wouldn't be whether I'm in fact disturbed or not), but I couldn't really explain coherently to her just why I found the violence (or even proposed violence that did not ultimately happen) in these novels so funny.
So I suppose I'm looking for a couple things here. One is a clearer rational for my own taste in literature; and I'd also like to hear from some people who think my taste is such books IS appalling, and why they feel that way. The question between my sister and I has too much family-related personal baggage to get through to the heart of the matter clearly.
They are what might be termed "Comic Crime" novels. Drowned Hopes by Donald Westlake, is about a large theft that the evil character plans to cover up by blowing a dam and drowning thousands of people. This is a book in his "Dortmunder" series that began with The Hot Rock, IIRC. The other, Double Whammy by Carl Hiassen, is about fraudulent bass fishing tournaments, and features an assortment of bizarre redneck and backwoods Florida characters, with some unusual deaths and injuries.
She simply cannot get any link between violence and humor. I'm not especially concerned that I'm disturbed (but I pobably wouldn't be whether I'm in fact disturbed or not), but I couldn't really explain coherently to her just why I found the violence (or even proposed violence that did not ultimately happen) in these novels so funny.
So I suppose I'm looking for a couple things here. One is a clearer rational for my own taste in literature; and I'd also like to hear from some people who think my taste is such books IS appalling, and why they feel that way. The question between my sister and I has too much family-related personal baggage to get through to the heart of the matter clearly.