PDA

View Full Version : Has plastic surgery 'improved' J.Lo?


Charlie Tan
04-28-2003, 07:51 AM
So I happened to catch U Turn (http://us.imdb.com/Title?0120399) on TV the other day. It took me a little while to connect the - quite - good looking latina with the J.Lo of late.

So, any opinions, gossip, hard facts, whatever?


Ladies and Gentlemen, I submit to you:

Exhibit A (http://us.imdb.com/EGallery?source=granitz&group=1195&photo=Events/1195/JenniferLopez_Granitz_178526.jpg&path=pgallery&path_key=Lopez,%20Jennifer)

Exhibit B (http://us.imdb.com/EGallery?source=granitz&group=1159&photo=Events/1159/lopez_jennifer3&path=pgallery&path_key=Lopez,%20Jennifer)

Short Guy
04-28-2003, 08:07 AM
Uhm, is it a confirmed fact that J-Lo has had plastic surgery? Or is that the question you're asking? If it is, I don't think she's had plastic surgery. Keeping in mind that people can change quite a lot in five or six years, I think it's just a 'natural' thing, combined with different use of make-up, hairstyles, etc. I think she used to be prettier, but she used to be younger, too, so...

Charlie Tan
04-28-2003, 08:29 AM
No, I'm asking if anyone knows if she's had something done. It looks to me that her complexion is much lighter.

This is - by me - not ment to be a J.Lo. bash-fest. I like her as an actress of popcorn movies and think she looks good. But then, I've always been partial to 'Latin' women. Her music is not very interesting, but I give her credit for having top grossing movie and album out at the same time - something not even Madonna's managed to do.

Her diva style and choice in men is of no cencern of mine. I don't plan to hang with her during the weekend, so for me, those are moot points.

Payton's Servant
04-28-2003, 08:33 AM
Originally posted by The Gaspode
No, I'm asking if anyone knows if she's had something done. It looks to me that her complexion is much lighter.

A) It's called makeup.

B) It's called getting a suntan.

C) It's called not having a clue about flash photography.

Michael Ellis
04-28-2003, 08:43 AM
I don't care.

Charlie Tan
04-28-2003, 08:51 AM
Padding your post count there, Michael Ellis?

JRDelirious
04-28-2003, 08:51 AM
Nah, no major alterations there -- as Shortguy and Servant said, it's likely a combination of changing hair/makeup/dress styles, variations in weight/muscle definition, and photo/videographic effect both good and bad.

ShibbOleth
04-28-2003, 09:08 AM
She looks sort of like Scary Spice in the first photo. And I don't mean that as a good thing. I generally find her attractive, over the years, but that first pic, sheesh, wonder if her publicist screens these things. Very bad eye makeup.

Michael Ellis
04-28-2003, 09:33 AM
Originally posted by The Gaspode
Padding your post count there, Michael Ellis?

Curses! Foiled Again!

RickJay
04-28-2003, 10:01 AM
I see no difference. The skin colour differecne appears to be a product of the second photo being a bad photo; there's obviously flash glare coming off her skin. In the first photo she has different hair and worse makeup. That's it.

MusicJunkie
04-28-2003, 10:08 AM
She's very, very pretty on the first one and nightmarish on the second. What happened to her? It's like two different girls.

Fear Itself
04-28-2003, 10:45 AM
Both pictures look the same to me. No difference.