Shagnasty
06-19-2003, 02:35 PM
Racketeering has always seemed like a really weird thing to charge someone with to me.
Dictionary.com give the definition of racketeering as:
------------------------------------------------------------
rack·et·eer ( P ) Pronunciation Key (rk-tîr)
n.
A person who commits crimes such as extortion, loansharking, bribery, and obstruction of justice in furtherance of illegal business activities.
------------------------------------------------------------
Aren't these all distinct crimes already. It sounds like they are just charging someone with "Um, real bad mafia type stuff and being a naughty, naughty person."
My question is why is racketeering a formal charge rather than a general description of behavior and why don't they just charge someone with the actual illegal activities engaged in rather than this vague description.
Dictionary.com give the definition of racketeering as:
------------------------------------------------------------
rack·et·eer ( P ) Pronunciation Key (rk-tîr)
n.
A person who commits crimes such as extortion, loansharking, bribery, and obstruction of justice in furtherance of illegal business activities.
------------------------------------------------------------
Aren't these all distinct crimes already. It sounds like they are just charging someone with "Um, real bad mafia type stuff and being a naughty, naughty person."
My question is why is racketeering a formal charge rather than a general description of behavior and why don't they just charge someone with the actual illegal activities engaged in rather than this vague description.