rlanpo
08-31-2005, 08:35 PM
today at a training about culturally relevant teaching the presenter insisted that thomas alva edison was part mexican.
her reasoning:
1. someone had told her
2. his middle name is "alva"
3. there are schools where mexican-americans attend that are named for him
4. thomas can also be tomas
:smack:
now it would be great to show this cultural relevance to my students, but this was not quite compelling evidence. i needed documentation. i searched all over google and google scholar and all i got was encarta saying he is dutch and british and another site referring to the legend that he was actually a part-mexican orphan adopted by an american couple.
i just wanted some more backup on this story to reinforce that what we want to be true or politically useful may not be, actually.
her reasoning:
1. someone had told her
2. his middle name is "alva"
3. there are schools where mexican-americans attend that are named for him
4. thomas can also be tomas
:smack:
now it would be great to show this cultural relevance to my students, but this was not quite compelling evidence. i needed documentation. i searched all over google and google scholar and all i got was encarta saying he is dutch and british and another site referring to the legend that he was actually a part-mexican orphan adopted by an american couple.
i just wanted some more backup on this story to reinforce that what we want to be true or politically useful may not be, actually.