AHunter3
09-19-2005, 11:02 AM
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/V/VIDEOTAPED_ASSAULT?SITE=1010WINS&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT
:smack:
It's a scary commentary on the state of the gene pool when someone thinks that proving he forced his wife to have sex with him would invalidate her Order of Protection against him. You think it's possible this fellow is actually all that unclear on the concept of consent? Or is it more of a carryover of ancient moldy attitudes along the lines of "See, I had her so she's mine and nothing else matters"? But that doesn't make much sense either, since it was no secret that they were married :confused:
Too violent and too fucking STOOPID to live.
:smack:
It's a scary commentary on the state of the gene pool when someone thinks that proving he forced his wife to have sex with him would invalidate her Order of Protection against him. You think it's possible this fellow is actually all that unclear on the concept of consent? Or is it more of a carryover of ancient moldy attitudes along the lines of "See, I had her so she's mine and nothing else matters"? But that doesn't make much sense either, since it was no secret that they were married :confused:
Too violent and too fucking STOOPID to live.