PDA

View Full Version : Is Britney a female flasher


Bippy the Beardless
11-30-2006, 12:48 PM
I'm starting to wonder if Britney Spears is the female version of a flasher. This is different to a streaker who shows their entire body, not necessarily for sexual fettish reasons. But like the steriotypical dirty old man in a raincoat that shows his penis to startle others for his own self gratification.

Is there a real mental 'illness' behind such people's action, and is Britney suffering from the same 'illness'?

I'm reminded of the ROcky Horror Picture show where the comments track suggests that Little Nell was a female flasher, and that the exposures that got into the film were all intentional on her part.

So do female flashers really exist. And is it a real paraphillia like male flashing.

yojimbo
11-30-2006, 12:55 PM
Nah, I reckon the stupid bint just wants press coverage.

Either that or she's just losing the run of herself* while out on the piss with Paris and Lynsey.

I'd go with the press coverage meself.

*Being to drunk for her own good.

Indygrrl
11-30-2006, 01:03 PM
I think I'd make sure my twat didn't look like roast beef before I went around giving crotch shots, but maybe that's just me. ;)

Exapno Mapcase
11-30-2006, 01:05 PM
http://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/story?id=2681885&page=1
According to celebrity blogger Perez Hilton, Spears' up-skirt shots are no mistake they're a classic cry for attention.


"She wants the picture taken. She wants the publicity. She wants people talking about her," Hilton said of Spears. "That's what people love to see more than anything. Why do you think celebrity sex tapes sell so well?"

Ethilrist
11-30-2006, 01:10 PM
Well, Paris would certainly know, wouldn't she?

Indygrrl
11-30-2006, 01:16 PM
Well, Paris would certainly know, wouldn't she?


That's Perez Hilton the gossip blogger, not Paris Hilton the attention whore. :D

brianjedi
11-30-2006, 02:10 PM
I think I'd make sure my twat didn't look like roast beef before I went around giving crotch shots, but maybe that's just me. ;)

If you're eating roast beef that looks like Britney's happy place, I'd find a new cook.

Not a thing wrong with how her cooter looks.

Wee Bairn
11-30-2006, 02:17 PM
Not a good shot of course, but on a scale of 1-10 I'd rate her happly place at about a 4. At least it doesn't look a wizards sleeve, but give her time, she's still young.

Eonwe
11-30-2006, 02:18 PM
Also color me puzzled as to what's so horrible about the look of her vagina. It looks fairly normal to me.

Biggirl
11-30-2006, 02:20 PM
If you're eating roast beef that looks like Britney's happy place, I'd find a new cook.

Not a thing wrong with how her cooter looks.
I dunno which set of pics you're looking at. If she has a green dress on, then yeah, her poontang is just as nice and neat as can be-- but if it is the other set, then "meat flaps" comes to mind.

I've seen my share of punannies and, let me assure you, the outer part usually does not hang quite so low. Perhaps her vajayjay got that way from a night of dragging it around from night club to night club or maybe the friction of sliding it up and down the limo seat.

That's it, I'm done. I can't think of any other stupid names to call Britney's vagina.

pool
11-30-2006, 02:20 PM
;) Her vagina looks fine to me. If you look for it you can see what looks to be a C-section scar.

Indygrrl
11-30-2006, 02:21 PM
If you're eating roast beef that looks like Britney's happy place, I'd find a new cook.

Not a thing wrong with how her cooter looks.

I disagree, she's nasty. Between her rolls of flab, her c-section scar, and her dried up pussy I'd say there's plenty wrong with how she looks. Sure, some women have those issues, but they don't go around spreading their legs for the paparazzi.

http://thesuperficial.com/2006/11/britney_spears_really_wants_yo.html

jjimm
11-30-2006, 02:25 PM
I've spent years waiting to see that, and now I'm rather disappointed. And faintly disgusted.

UntouchedTakeaway
11-30-2006, 02:26 PM
I'm starting to wonder if Britney Spears is the female version of a flasher. This is different to a streaker who shows their entire body, not necessarily for sexual fettish reasons. But like the steriotypical dirty old man in a raincoat that shows his penis to startle others for his own self gratification.

Is there a real mental 'illness' behind such people's action, and is Britney suffering from the same 'illness'?

I'm reminded of the ROcky Horror Picture show where the comments track suggests that Little Nell was a female flasher, and that the exposures that got into the film were all intentional on her part.

So do female flashers really exist. And is it a real paraphillia like male flashing.


Neither. I attribute it to a total lack of breeding. She (and the other two in the Unholy Trinity) are perfect examples of how money cannot buy class.

Compare them with the late Princess Diana. She may have been nuttier than a Claxton fruitcake, but that broad knew how to be a lady. When you're wearing a skirt (or 1/8th of a skirt & no bloomers), you put your knees together, turn on your butt & swing your CLOSED legs & feet to the ground outside the car door. *Then* you arise from the car. You don't flap them open and let the world get a glimpse the unknown.

They are classless, clueless and common.

VCNJ~

Eonwe
11-30-2006, 02:35 PM
I disagree, she's nasty. Between her rolls of flab, her c-section scar, and her dried up pussy I'd say there's plenty wrong with how she looks. Sure, some women have those issues, but they don't go around spreading their legs for the paparazzi.

http://thesuperficial.com/2006/11/britney_spears_really_wants_yo.html


So, most normal vaginas are dripping wet? That would be typical? Most women who aren't nasty looking don't have any rolls of fat?

I don't mean to harp on this, but I just wish that people would admit that they want to make fun of Britney and call her ugly and gross and a skank regardless of what she looks like, instead of insisting that this normal-if-not-above-average-looking woman somehow is ugly, fat, or whatever.

well he's back
11-30-2006, 02:36 PM
Ohmigosh - Veuve ClicquotNJ has said it all. Nothing more need be said.

Biggirl
11-30-2006, 02:41 PM
So, most normal vaginas are dripping wet? That would be typical? Most women who aren't nasty looking don't have any rolls of fat?

I don't mean to harp on this, but I just wish that people would admit that they want to make fun of Britney and call her ugly and gross and a skank regardless of what she looks like, instead of insisting that this normal-if-not-above-average-looking woman somehow is ugly, fat, or whatever.

I'm not speaking for Indygrrl but I will repeat--- labias do NOT usually hang down in that manner. They do not usually come into contact with your thighs. Take it from a woman who vaginally gave birth to twins (no whimpy c-sections for me!)-- even immediatly after the birth, my lips stayed up where they belong-- attached quite firmly to the rest of my womanly bits.

Indygrrl
11-30-2006, 02:44 PM
So, most normal vaginas are dripping wet? That would be typical? Most women who aren't nasty looking don't have any rolls of fat?

I don't mean to harp on this, but I just wish that people would admit that they want to make fun of Britney and call her ugly and gross and a skank regardless of what she looks like, instead of insisting that this normal-if-not-above-average-looking woman somehow is ugly, fat, or whatever.

Ok, this link is Not Safe for Work or for sensitive people:

http://thesuperficial.com/image.php?path=/2006/11/28/britney-spears-upskirt-vagina-05.jpg

You look at that and tell me it is not grotesque. Maybe I'm fortunate enough to only see pretty pussies, but in my experience that is NOT how a healthy vagina looks. And she IS flabby, that is not an exaggeration, it is right there in front of you.

And if Britney is above average looking then I am Miss Universe.

I've stood up for her before, and I still do think she will make an awesome comeback, but how she looks right now is not impressive. She's vile.

pool
11-30-2006, 02:48 PM
Is it really hanging down? Couldn't it just be an odd angle along with an ackward posture?

Captain Lance Murdoch
11-30-2006, 02:56 PM
It couldn't be just drunkenness. She left the house with no underwear on. She knew she would be mobbed by paparazzi because she always is. She must have premeditated this whole display.

I can only think she is mentally reeling in the wake of her announced divorce. She looks like she has just completely lost it.

Haven't looked at the pics and with luck it will stay that way. Sounds way more gross than titillating.

Wee Bairn
11-30-2006, 02:58 PM
Given the choice of mastubating to those pics or the bra section of the winter 1974 Sears Catalog, I would choose the latter.

Eonwe
11-30-2006, 02:59 PM
Ok, this link is Not Safe for Work or for sensitive people:

http://thesuperficial.com/image.php?path=/2006/11/28/britney-spears-upskirt-vagina-05.jpg

You look at that and tell me it is not grotesque. Maybe I'm fortunate enough to only see pretty pussies, but in my experience that is NOT how a healthy vagina looks. And she IS flabby, that is not an exaggeration, it is right there in front of you.

And if Britney is above average looking then I am Miss Universe.

I've stood up for her before, and I still do think she will make an awesome comeback, but how she looks right now is not impressive. She's vile.

Well, since I'm at work, I'll have to hold judgement on that link until later this evening; I'm just going off of what I remember seeing last night.

But, here's the thing (and I promise to come back here once I get home and look at some of these other links): I look around at the women in my office, for example. They probably range in age from 20-ish to 50-something. Britney is, no questions asked, in the top 30% percentile for good-lookingness (and really, that's very very conservative). If I went down to the local college campus, and compared her to the college girls there, she'd still be comfortably in the top 50% (again, that's a very conservative estimate).

My point is not that she's supermodel-esque. It's just that if I lived in a world where Britney represented the bottom of the barrel looks-wise, then goodness would this be a smokin' place to be.

If Britney looks vile, then I'd hate to hear judgments passed on other women.

Biggirl
11-30-2006, 03:01 PM
Is it really hanging down? Couldn't it just be an odd angle along with an ackward posture?

Both sets of pics are at wwwegotasticdotcom (not linking even though the thumbnails have strategic stars that you must click to see the unvarnished truth)-- the one in which she is wearing the green dress is on top and if you scroll down you can see the pics of her in the car with Paris. There are many shots and many angles and, well, I guess you can decide.

Eonwe
11-30-2006, 03:02 PM
Oh, and like pool says, I'm sure lots of folks vaginas could be photographed in less-than-flattering angles/situations. Not only that, but IME shaving makes labia much more pronounced than they would be otherwise.

Biffy the Elephant Shrew
11-30-2006, 03:02 PM
even immediatly after the birth, my lips stayed up where they belong--
Where the eagles cry, on a mountain high?

Zabali_Clawbane
11-30-2006, 03:03 PM
This isn't such an old idea, as evidenced by Britney Britney Britney (http://www.atomfilms.com/landing/landingIndex.jsp?id=britney&mature=accept) on Atomfilms. (May not be safe for work.)

Diddledog
11-30-2006, 03:08 PM
I'm not speaking for Indygrrl but I will repeat--- labias do NOT usually hang down in that manner. They do not usually come into contact with your thighs. Take it from a woman who vaginally gave birth to twins (no whimpy c-sections for me!)-- even immediatly after the birth, my lips stayed up where they belong-- attached quite firmly to the rest of my womanly bits.

As a connoisseur of vaginas, I'm always puzzled when people get so hyper critical of a woman's parts. Especially when it comes from a woman. I happen to like the more natural appearance and appreciate the variety.

When it's a man (or more likely a boy) pointing at a pussy and saying "ewwwww!," I figure it's the result of viewing too much porn in which the women's hot bits are unnaturally neat (like the rest of the woman) and shaved to look like a 12-year-old girl's vagina. My theory is that there is a whole generation of young men who -- having little firsthand experience with pussies -- think that is the natural state of a vagina and that any depiction of fleshy labia (or more than just tiny perfect little lips) is some sort of horrific deformity. And God forbid they should ever see pussy hair!

When a woman makes the same criticism, that explanation probably doesn't hold up. So is it just cattiness, combined with a hate for Britney? And too much pride in one's own pussy? You know, I'm pretty sure your labia just are what they are and you can't really take credit for having them tucked up so neatly "where they belong." Unless Britney's been doing some really wierd S&M things like hanging the LA phone book from her pussy and walking around the house, I doubt she had any control over her pussy lips being neat and orderly or wild and wiggly.

And your assertion that labia just don't hang like that is wrong. Yeah, sometimes they do. Maybe you like it, maybe you don't, but what are you implying? That being a no-talent pop star makes your pussy lips grow like Pinnochio's nose?

Of course, that doesn't change the fact that she's skanky trailer trash.

Spoke
11-30-2006, 03:10 PM
I have no love for Britney, but y'all are going overboard with the hatin'.

Maybe I'm fortunate enough to only see pretty pussies, but in my experience that is NOT how a healthy vagina looks.

I do see some unsightly redness in what might be the "taint" area, but nothing truly grotesque.

And she IS flabby, that is not an exaggeration, it is right there in front of you.

Nope. Not seeing that at all. Only if you have bought into anorexia would she seem "flabby." Looks perfectly normal, weight-wise.

And if Britney is above average looking then I am Miss Universe.

Well, she is an above-average looking woman, but, as this series of pictures reveal (to those who hadn't already noticed) Britney just wasn't "raised right." She is coming across as a skank, and for that reason is unappealing (despite her above-average looks).

Indygrrl
11-30-2006, 03:11 PM
If Britney looks vile, then I'd hate to hear judgments passed on other women.

The average woman isn't going around giving crotch shots to photographers, so there's no call to judge them. Any women posed in a skin mag would be subject to scrutiny, so Britney knew what she was getting into when she decided to show the world her goods.

I work with about 50 women who are more beautiful than Britney Spears, by a mile. And their pussies ain't skeery like that. I simply can't agree that Brit is in the top percentage of gorgeous women, it just doesn't fit with the world I live in.

ralph124c
11-30-2006, 03:18 PM
Q: aren't women like BS exhibitionists? Face, she likes attention. one way to get it is to dress provocatively. You can't tell me that she doesn't enjoy this. What about the models? their "job" is to walk doen a catwalk, wearing little or nothing-of course they are well paid for this!

Diddledog
11-30-2006, 03:19 PM
I work with about 50 women who are more beautiful than Britney Spears, by a mile. And their pussies ain't skeery like that. I simply can't agree that Brit is in the top percentage of gorgeous women, it just doesn't fit with the world I live in.

Intriguing......
So you work with 50 women more beautiful than Britney Spears and you've all compared pussies at some point. Are you accepting applications?

Eonwe
11-30-2006, 03:19 PM
The average woman isn't going around giving crotch shots to photographers, so there's no call to judge them. Any women posed in a skin mag would be subject to scrutiny, so Britney knew what she was getting into when she decided to show the world her goods.

I work with about 50 women who are more beautiful than Britney Spears, by a mile. And their pussies ain't skeery like that. I simply can't agree that Brit is in the top percentage of gorgeous women, it just doesn't fit with the world I live in.


Well, perhaps we will have to agree to disagree. :)

But, I will try to make one more point. Yes, Britney opened herself up to scrutiny (hah!) by flashing the photographers. But, that doesn't have any relevance to her physical beauty, just her level of crassness.

Have you seen the vaginas of those fifty women? What kind of place do you work in which you all are willing to, um, share like that?

Indygrrl
11-30-2006, 03:25 PM
Have you seen the vaginas of those fifty women? What kind of place do you work in which you all are willing to, um, share like that?

It's a strip club, everyone's pretty liberal when it comes to nekkidness. ;)

Eonwe
11-30-2006, 03:28 PM
It's a strip club, everyone's pretty liberal when it comes to nekkidness. ;)


Ah ha!

In that case, I suggest you're not working from a representative sample of the genita... general female population!

brianjedi
11-30-2006, 03:28 PM
It's a strip club, everyone's pretty liberal when it comes to nekkidness. ;)

OK, there is no way there are 50 strippers TOTAL in Indianapolis who are better-looking than Britney Spears, much less at one club.

At least not in normal lighting. Under blacklights and a strobe light, possibly.

Biggirl
11-30-2006, 03:29 PM
As a connoisseur of vaginas, I'm always puzzled when people get so hyper critical of a woman's parts. Especially when it comes from a woman. I happen to like the more natural appearance and appreciate the variety.

When it's a man (or more likely a boy) pointing at a pussy and saying "ewwwww!," I figure it's the result of viewing too much porn in which the women's hot bits are unnaturally neat (like the rest of the woman) and shaved to look like a 12-year-old girl's vagina. My theory is that there is a whole generation of young men who -- having little firsthand experience with pussies -- think that is the natural state of a vagina and that any depiction of fleshy labia (or more than just tiny perfect little lips) is some sort of horrific deformity. And God forbid they should ever see pussy hair!

When a woman makes the same criticism, that explanation probably doesn't hold up. So is it just cattiness, combined with a hate for Britney? And too much pride in one's own pussy? You know, I'm pretty sure your labia just are what they are and you can't really take credit for having them tucked up so neatly "where they belong." Unless Britney's been doing some really wierd S&M things like hanging the LA phone book from her pussy and walking around the house, I doubt she had any control over her pussy lips being neat and orderly or wild and wiggly.

And your assertion that labia just don't hang like that is wrong. Yeah, sometimes they do. Maybe you like it, maybe you don't, but what are you implying? That being a no-talent pop star makes your pussy lips grow like Pinnochio's nose?

Of course, that doesn't change the fact that she's skanky trailer trash.



I contend that those hanging labia are NOT normal-- not even for Britney. Take a look at the second set of pictures where she looks just fine and dandy. It is my belief that a drunken night of dragging that pussy around unadorned and unprotected caused that unsightly mess. I have also seen a lot of pussies. Lots and lots-- in showers, on children, in locker rooms, in girlfriend's apartments, in porno-- I've seen hangy ones, I've seen fat ones, I've seen stretched out ones-- but I have NEVER seen lips that go past the groin and touch thigh.

Spoke
11-30-2006, 03:32 PM
I have NEVER seen lips that go past the groin and touch thigh.

Maybe I'm missing it, but I'm not seeing the picture where this is happening.

jjimm
11-30-2006, 03:37 PM
a drunken night of dragging that pussy around unadorned and unprotected caused that unsightly mess.Are you saying that not wearing panties for a night causes labial distention? I find that very difficult to believe. (Though like spoke-, I also can't see where this is allegedly happening.)

I contend that it looks like it smells a bit, though.

Lord Ashtar
11-30-2006, 03:37 PM
Whatever, haters. I'd still do her, and I'm pretty sure I'm not alone.

Diddledog
11-30-2006, 03:41 PM
but I have NEVER seen lips that go past the groin and touch thigh.

Well, now you have. Consider your horizons broadened.

I say we just stone her for being a skank rather than for having a body part that you consider freakish.

The Universe Lashes Out
11-30-2006, 03:42 PM
You may hate her personality, her music, or the attention she gets (I know I do) but she's still more attractive than the average chick her age. But she has been tainted by the fact we know way too much about her, and aside from her looks, she's not pretty at all. If I saw her for the first time right now, without any knowledge of her trailer-trash lifestyle, I would think "Hey, she's pretty good-looking. Not top of the line, but still pretty cute." And as a heterosexual male, I can tell you there's nothing scary at all about her pussy. The only time I can see her labia "hanging down" are in that shot from behind. But with the angle of the picture and the fact that she's bending over, any of you ladies hating on Britney would have the same "gross" labia showing she's got. I've seen meat curtains, and those are no meat curtains.

Cubsfan
11-30-2006, 03:47 PM
As a guy who has seen his fair share of real life vaginas I can tell you that hers looks as normal as any I've ever seen. Vaginas in and of themselves are not attractive at all anyway.

Waverly
11-30-2006, 03:48 PM
I work with about 50 women who are more beautiful than Britney Spears, by a mile. And their pussies ain't skeery like that. I simply can't agree that Brit is in the top percentage of gorgeous women, it just doesn't fit with the world I live in.You work with 50 beautiful women, and have detailed knowldedge of what their hoo-ha's look like? Don't feel you have to explain. Just tell me where to send my resume.

SkipMagic
11-30-2006, 03:50 PM
I know what lies beneath is an interesting topic and all, but let's please be careful when posting these links. Remember to follow the "two-click" rule as outlined in the Registration Agreement (http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?t=347160):
Do not post links to pornography - we will be the judge of what constitutes pornography. Links to nudity or other potentially shocking or offensive material are permissible only in the context of a mature discussion - gratuitous posting of such links is grounds for revocation of your posting privileges. When posting a link to potentially shocking or offensive material, observe the "two click" rule - don't link directly to the item, but rather to an intermediate page that in turns links to the item.

Biggirl
11-30-2006, 03:50 PM
Well, now you have. Consider your horizons broadened.

I say we just stone her for being a skank rather than for having a body part that you consider freakish.
Stone her? Why? I love that girl! Walking through gas station restrooms barefoot, marrying gold-digging baby daddies, dropping her baby while on the red carpet, speeding down the highway with the kid and a Starbucks coffee on her lap-- that girl is Celebrity Snark gold!

Plus, I really like Toxic.


Are you saying that not wearing panties for a night causes labial distention? I find that very difficult to believe.

I wouldn't have thunk it either until I saw it with my very own eyes. It does look reversible, seeing as how the pics with the normal looking cooter were taken after the pics of the hangy ones.

jjimm
11-30-2006, 03:53 PM
I know what lies beneath is an interesting topic and all, but let's please be careful when posting these links. Remember to follow the "two-click" rule as outlined in the Registration Agreement (http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?t=347160):In fairness, the link was to a bowdlerized, pixellated version of the actual pics, and therefore doesn't violate the rule.

DianaG
11-30-2006, 03:54 PM
I work with about 50 women who are more beautiful than Britney Spears, by a mile. And their pussies ain't skeery like that.
And you know that how? :dubious:

When a woman makes the same criticism, that explanation probably doesn't hold up. So is it just cattiness, combined with a hate for Britney? And too much pride in one's own pussy? You know, I'm pretty sure your labia just are what they are and you can't really take credit for having them tucked up so neatly "where they belong." Unless Britney's been doing some really wierd S&M things like hanging the LA phone book from her pussy and walking around the house, I doubt she had any control over her pussy lips being neat and orderly or wild and wiggly.
Seriously. Why are some people so invested in Brit's nethers being "abnormal" or "gross"? They're just... nethers. No two look alike, after all. Like snowflakes! :D

The pictures are gross because they're so inappropriate and tacky. Not because there's anything inherently wrong with her genitals.

Honey
11-30-2006, 04:02 PM
In that car photo, Britney makes Paris Hilton look downright ladylike. No wonder Paris likes hanging out with her. So to speak.

Spoke
11-30-2006, 04:07 PM
The only time I can see her labia "hanging down" are in that shot from behind.

I have seen a vagina or three and that shot looks perfectly normal to me. All we see are her labia majora, as you would expect to see from that angle. Her labia minora are nowhere to be seen. (Now if those were visible and hanging down at that viewing angle, you might have a better case for unsightliness.)

This anatomical perspective is brought to you by the letter P.

SkipMagic
11-30-2006, 04:08 PM
In fairness, the link was to a bowdlerized, pixellated version of the actual pics, and therefore doesn't violate the rule.
Not the links I disabled for posts #18 and #22. Go on, check it out.

You know you want to. (Extremely not safe for work.)

Indygrrl
11-30-2006, 04:11 PM
OK, there is no way there are 50 strippers TOTAL in Indianapolis who are better-looking than Britney Spears, much less at one club.

At least not in normal lighting. Under blacklights and a strobe light, possibly.

Well, my club doesn't hire girls unless they are in shape and attractive. There might not be 50 that are top notch, but there are a lot more than you'd think. And there are definitely more than 50 in Indianapolis. You're acting like Britney is the be-all, end-all of women. IMO, she's common trailer trash. We can definitely best that.

Spoke
11-30-2006, 04:11 PM
Og help me. I am defending Britney Spears.

Indygrrl
11-30-2006, 04:12 PM
And you know that how? :dubious:

Because I've seen them naked.

The Swan
11-30-2006, 04:13 PM
And you know that how? :dubious:




Read the thread, and you'll know how.

DianaG
11-30-2006, 04:14 PM
I see that now, I'd missed the stripper thing originally.

UntouchedTakeaway
11-30-2006, 04:20 PM
Well, my club doesn't hire girls unless they are in shape and attractive. There might not be 50 that are top notch, but there are a lot more than you'd think. And there are definitely more than 50 in Indianapolis. You're acting like Britney is the be-all, end-all of women. IMO, she's common trailer trash. We can definitely best that.

I don't know about you, but I find it comforting to know that skank, trash & the willingness to flash cooter seem to rank above class, breeding and a little mystery.

No wonder I can't get a date. Heh.

VCNJ~

Indygrrl
11-30-2006, 04:24 PM
I don't know about you, but I find it comforting to know that skank, trash & the willingness to flash cooter seem to rank above class, breeding and a little mystery.

No wonder I can't get a date. Heh.

VCNJ~

I'm not sure what you are trying to say with that. I know quite a few strippers who are classy and mysterious. You can be willing to strip and still maintain those things.

And I think the criticisms of Britney are all about her lack of class. Again, I am not sure what you are getting at.

Wee Bairn
11-30-2006, 04:24 PM
There was a similar picture of Paris Hilton emerging from a car with her vertical smile showing that was big a year or two back, and I recall hers being much nicer.

UntouchedTakeaway
11-30-2006, 04:26 PM
I'm not sure what you are trying to say with that. I know quite a few strippers who are classy and mysterious. You can be willing to strip and still maintain those things.

And I think the criticisms of Britney are all about her lack of class. Again, I am not sure what you are getting at.


Nothing at all against strippers. Hell, if I had known then what I knew now, I would have done the same thing. Good way (IMHO) to make a good living quickly if you can keep your nose clean. Everything against the fact that classless snotbags like Britney (and the women who emulate her) seem to be en vogue.

VCNJ~

UntouchedTakeaway
11-30-2006, 04:27 PM
I'm not sure what you are trying to say with that. I know quite a few strippers who are classy and mysterious. You can be willing to strip and still maintain those things.

And I think the criticisms of Britney are all about her lack of class. Again, I am not sure what you are getting at.

To further clarify, I was agreeing with what you said about Britney & the lack of class.


VCNJ~

Little Nemo
11-30-2006, 04:35 PM
In that car photo, Britney makes Paris Hilton look downright ladylike. No wonder Paris likes hanging out with her. So to speak.
There's one photo where Hilton is pushing Spears' leg down to hide the view. I think it's a pretty good rule of thumb that when Paris Hilton thinks you're showing too much, you've probably crossed the line.

dropzone
11-30-2006, 04:35 PM
OK, there is no way there are 50 strippers TOTAL in Indianapolis who are better-looking than Britney Spears, much less at one club.Amen to that! I've been to strip clubs in Indy* and I'd wager there aren't even that many. Not that Britney is that fabulous, but she has very nice features, a nice figure, and a perfectly normal looking pussy. She is in the top 90% of women her age and if you don't think so start observing and picking apart the features of the women you know who may be better looking. Because affection can blind one to the "flaws" of one's friends, you'll find that very few can hold up to the same level of scrutiny as we give Ms Spears.


* - I seem to remember a thread I started many years ago about my experiences as a designated driver in one strip club and how sobriety and way too much time on my hands allowed me to see that the women being fawned over might not get a second glance in daylight. I'd look it up but I'm too lazy.

dropzone
11-30-2006, 04:38 PM
And I think the criticisms of Britney are all about her lack of class.I agree with that, though I'm surprised if anybody expects better of her.

bienville
11-30-2006, 04:40 PM
I am NOT defending Britney Spears!
I am defending pussy!

Re: dangly bits
My best friend is now in her late thirties and has just recently found body-image peace concerning her labia. Having recently become single again, she went through quite a crisis over the thought of dating and establishing a sexual relationship with someone new. "Oh, no! When he sees my freakishly dangly labia he'll be horrified!"

This has been a major inhibition that has bothered her ever since adolescence, not just with sex partners but also amongst other women in locker rooms etc.

A few months ago she found a website that encouraged positve body image for women. Website coordinators and visitors contributed nude pictures in the interest of promoting acceptance of realistic average women and the wide variety of body types. All images were presented as a celebration of the various packages in which beauty can be found.

The point was to provide for women whose body image has been negatively affected by "perfect body" images presented as the standard, a bit of a wake-up call saying, "No, you're not a freak! Most women don't look like that, most women look like this! Chances are that you look like the kind of woman your sex partner is used to seeing naked (in real life, despite what may be seen in porn)!"

The was a whole page of breasts: women with one breast bigger than the other, nipples that point down, extra large areola, long nipples, etc.
And much to my friend's relief, there was a whole page of vaginas no two of which looked the same.

If I can found out what the website was, I'll direct y'all to it.




I totally agree with Indygrrl that as a public figure Britney Spears opens herself up (no, we don't need that joke again) to scrutiny and criticism.

However, leveling such harsh criticism upon Britney Spears' body does a disservice to millions of women whose body image is already negatively affected by media images of what a woman's body should look like. "If Britney Spears, looking like she does, is fat and hideous then, Christ, I've got to lose even more weight than I thought!!!"




Personally, I happen to like large dangling labia. As there seems to be porn for just about every fetish, I don't know why it's so hard for me to find dangling labia porn.

I happen to like the the sensation, while performing oral sex on a woman, of having flaps of labia suctioned onto either cheek. Gimme labia that'll tickle my earlobes, and I'd be in heaven!



P.S. Diddledog, nice to see a newbie with such great contributions! Please stick around! I'd like to see you posting here for a long time to come!!!

PunditLisa
11-30-2006, 04:43 PM
I think Britney is a very pretty young woman who's a great dancer and a barely passable singer. Mixed in with a great deal of luck, that combination has made her very wealthy. (I read that she's worth $180m.) How much longer an aging pop star of moderate talent can milk a career remains to be seen. But I would theorize that if she's so desperate for publicity that she's offering up crotch shots, the end is definitely near.

iluvurmom
11-30-2006, 04:52 PM
lol this is the funnies thread I've read all day:)

bienville
11-30-2006, 04:59 PM
I have also seen a lot of pussies. Lots and lots-- in showers, on children, in locker rooms, in girlfriend's apartments, in porno-- I've seen hangy ones, I've seen fat ones, I've seen stretched out ones-- but I have NEVER seen lips that go past the groin and touch thigh.

Then you haven't seen enough pussies to even know what your looking at in those pics.

What you're referring to is the crease between her left thigh and her pelvis. A crease that would not be apparent if she were standing straight or laying down with her legs outstretched, but a crease that while seated would be apparent on any but the absolute skinniest of people.

The crease is made even more apparent because
as seated her left knee is higher than her pelvis
turning to get out of the car, she is leading with her legs: her left leg has made the turn before her pelvis has rotated
Opal pussy


Yes, the top of her inner thigh does look like it may be in contact with her vulva but that is because her leg is turned to cross her pelvis. I can touch my finger to my nose that doesn't prove I have a freakishly large nose!!!!!

TLDRIDKJKLOLFTW
11-30-2006, 05:07 PM
Yeah, I just have to jump in here and say that it's the epitome of a normal, nonthreatening, perfectly average pussy.

jjimm
11-30-2006, 05:11 PM
Not the links I disabled for posts #18 and #22. Go on, check it out.

You know you want to. (Extremely not safe for work.)Oh Lord yes. Sorry, my bad. Good job I'm not at work.

Indygrrl
11-30-2006, 05:12 PM
However, leveling such harsh criticism upon Britney Spears' body does a disservice to millions of women whose body image is already negatively affected by media images of what a woman's body should look like. "If Britney Spears, looking like she does, is fat and hideous then, Christ, I've got to lose even more weight than I thought!!!"

You do have a good point here. I really don't think about it that way when I'm commenting on someone like Britney, but I see where it could be interpreted that way. I'll be the first to admit that I'm hung up on perfection, and that's an uncool way to look at anyone, even Britney.

Biffy the Elephant Shrew
11-30-2006, 05:54 PM
Opal pussy


Band name!

The Controvert
11-30-2006, 06:21 PM
Heh, I love the Seinfeld puffy shirt she's wearing in the photos. And she gives a hilarious thumbs-up sign in the other photos in the series.

Cat Whisperer
11-30-2006, 06:30 PM
<snip> The only time I can see her labia "hanging down" are in that shot from behind. But with the angle of the picture and the fact that she's bending over, any of you ladies hating on Britney would have the same "gross" labia showing she's got. <snip>
This is so wrong on so many levels (not your post, Howie - Britney's behaviour.) She's less classy than Paris Hilton? Yikes. Girl, get some panties on. I think we're seeing exactly why she and K-Fed were together. Doesn't it make you feel great to know that those two reproduced not once but *twice*?

(Does anyone else wonder if these panty-less wonders in the micro skirts leave a trail behind them everywhere they sit?)

Rysdad
11-30-2006, 06:55 PM
I have seen a vagina or three and that shot looks perfectly normal to me. All we see are her labia majora, as you would expect to see from that angle. Her labia minora are nowhere to be seen. (Now if those were visible and hanging down at that viewing angle, you might have a better case for unsightliness.)

Bingo.

Her crotch is a normal crotch. Seated as she is, with legs drawn up and torso turned to the side, the view you see is smack dab in the middle of the bell curve. Nothing notable or extraordinary.

That don't mean its owner ain't skanky, though. I mean, come on, would any of you ladies out there not know you were shootin' a beave while the flashbulbs were popping?

Damn it. There are lots of other female celebs I'd rather see flash. Why did it have to be her?

Dare we hope that she sets a trend?

Oh, God. I just had a terrfying thought: Oprah!

Tristan
11-30-2006, 07:05 PM
Oprah's Minge: She hasn't done anything with me in ages. I don't even think she knows I exist anymore.

Cisco
11-30-2006, 07:13 PM
I agree that it's a perfectly normal vadge.

Those of you who think it's "hangy" or beat up, worn out, drop-kicked, bitch-slapped, etc. - I don't think you realize what you're looking at. The only part of a girl's nether-region that could accurately be described as hangy in any circumstance is the labia minora and Britney's labia minora cannot be seen in most of these pictures (probably in the one from behind but all of these sites are going so slow that I'm not going to look again to make sure.)

Anyone who says her puss looks particularly gross is A) hating or B) has seen very few pussies and the lower parts of even fewer.

Indygrrl: All vaginas look good when the owner has their legs closed - you're only seeing the labia majora (cutest part in most people's opinion.)

Biggirl
11-30-2006, 07:17 PM
I agree that it's a perfectly normal vadge.

Those of you who think it's "hangy" or beat up, worn out, drop-kicked, bitch-slapped, etc. - I don't think you realize what you're looking at. The only part of a girl's nether-region that could accurately be described as hangy in any circumstance is the labia minora and Britney's labia minora cannot be seen in most of these pictures (probably in the one from behind but all of these sites are going so slow that I'm not going to look again to make sure.)

Anyone who says her puss looks particularly gross is A) hating or B) has seen very few pussies and the lower parts of even fewer.

Indygrrl: All vaginas look good when the owner has their legs closed - you're only seeing the labia majora (cutest part in most people's opinion.)

I know what I'm looking at. I am talking about her majora. You cannot see her minora, she'd have to assume the gyno position for that to be seen. I wouldn't be suprised if that's next up. Here's hoping!

bienville
11-30-2006, 07:22 PM
My best friend is now in her late thirties and has just recently found body-image peace concerning her labia. Having recently become single again, she went through quite a crisis over the thought of dating and establishing a sexual relationship with someone new. "Oh, no! When he sees my freakishly dangly labia he'll be horrified!"

This has been a major inhibition that has bothered her ever since adolescence, not just with sex partners but also amongst other women in locker rooms etc.

A few months ago she found a website that encouraged positve body image for women.


I found a similar website, but it's not the website I was thinking of when I wrote the above post.

The website I was thinking of was more, I guess, "clinical". This new website I found is definitely more sensual and glossy. Still, the primary attitude of the website is much less "jerk off to these hot pussy pics" but rather a "claim and celebrate your woanhood" kind of a thing.

So, if you have strong feelings against viewing pornography you might not want to follow the link. However, there's definitely a sort of scholastic feminism about the site, so if you're not looking for porn but are intellectually interested in the celebration of female sexuality you may find the site of interest.

Also, if you have a completely non-intellectual throbbing pornographic interest in bulging pussies you also may enjoy the site.



Direct links withheld out of respect for board rules (it won't kill you to copy and paste).

http://www.sexylabia DOT COM /table_of_contents.htm

Here's a pic of labia that the website considers to be the pussy-lips equivalent of Angelina Jolie's mouth-lips:

http://www.sexylabia DOT COM /pic26_angelina-jolie-lips.htm

Cisco
11-30-2006, 07:26 PM
I know what I'm looking at. I am talking about her majora. You cannot see her minora, she'd have to assume the gyno position for that to be seen. I wouldn't be suprised if that's next up. Here's hoping!
Explain how her majora can/does look gross/stretched out, etc. Use examples. This isn't registering with me.

Biggirl
11-30-2006, 07:27 PM
Also, the overwhelming opinion amongst my co-workers, family and on-line friends and acquaintances is that it's a regular pussie photographed at a bad angle. Against such staggering odds, I can only admit that I am--- not in the majority.




Or possibly wrong. Possibly.

tdn
11-30-2006, 07:30 PM
I'm going with wrong. :)

It looks like a perfecty yummy one to me. I was expecting something resembling road kill from the reactions here.

Alas, we've finally discovered Britney's true talent.

Biggirl
11-30-2006, 07:31 PM
Explain how her majora can/does look gross/stretched out, etc. Use examples. This isn't registering with me.

In the first shot of the site I linked to, her lips are touching her thigh. You've seen a few pussies, you should know how far lips have to stretch to touch thigh.


But. . . When it's only you who is seeing such a thing, you must entertain the idea that you are mistaken. The idea is not at all amused by me, though.

8675309
11-30-2006, 07:33 PM
She is in the top 90% of women her age .

That ain't saying much!

bienville
11-30-2006, 07:36 PM
In the first shot of the site I linked to, her lips are touching her thigh. You've seen a few pussies, you should know how far lips have to stretch to touch thigh.

To reiterate:
Yes, the top of her inner thigh does look like it may be in contact with her vulva but that is because her leg is turned to cross her pelvis. I can touch my finger to my nose that doesn't prove I have a freakishly large nose!!!!!

pool
11-30-2006, 07:37 PM
You know I keep looking at these photos and 2 stick out to me. I think in one where her leg is scrunched in close to her, what appears to be part of her naughty bits is actually a fold of fat from her thigh, because the next picture her vagina looks absolutely normal, I think what some claim they are seeing is fat from her thigh creasing in a way to give that mistaken appearance.

Cisco
11-30-2006, 07:40 PM
In the first shot of the site I linked to, her lips are touching her thigh. You've seen a few pussies, you should know how far lips have to stretch to touch thigh.


But. . . When it's only you who is seeing such a thing, you must entertain the idea that you are mistaken. The idea is not at all amused by me, though.
If I'm looking at what you're looking at - you're looking at her thigh. Unless you want to post a picture with the part you're looking at circled and give an NFL-style play-by-play, I'm pretty sure you're not looking at what you think you're looking at.

Her thigh moved to touch her LM, her LM did not move to touch her thigh. I do not see one iota of unordinariness in that.

Ogre
11-30-2006, 07:42 PM
Man, this chick is on the textbook Road To Porn. There's already the "sex tape," although I haven't seen it, and I have no idea if it's real. But Lord, it's only a matter of time before we see the Vivid "Britney DVDA" video.

Guinastasia
11-30-2006, 07:58 PM
Looks like a perfectly normal vag to me. Honestly, body image among women is bad enough-now we have to worry about how long our naughty bits are? Is there a standard? Are we going to start seeing plastic surgery on cooches, so they look "proper?" Of COURSE they look like they're hitting her thighs-look at the angle of the photograph, and how she's sitting.

As for how Britney looks, I agree she looks horrible-BUT...I think that's more due to the fact that she continually chooses the most unflattering clothing, hairstyles, and make-up. She has no fashion sense whatsoever. She dresses like a thirteen year old's idea of "sexy hooker" and constantly has those cheap Kmart extensions glued in and buys her make up 50% off from the 99 cent store.

And no way she didn't do this on purpose. It's Britney-she's so freaking pork stupid she probably figured, 'It'll be SEXAY, Y'ALL!!!' Ugh. Panties, Brit. Please.

neofishboy
11-30-2006, 08:11 PM
Apparently, the overwhelming opinion amongst my co-workers, family, on-line friends and acquaintances is that the question "Hey, whaddaya think of this pussy?" is making them uncomfortable and that I should really really just stop it.

Malienation
11-30-2006, 08:23 PM
I don't mean to harp on this, but I just wish that people would admit that they want to make fun of Britney and call her ugly and gross and a skank regardless of what she looks like, instead of insisting that this normal-if-not-above-average-looking woman somehow is ugly, fat, or whatever.Yeah, this reminds me of the Linda Tripp thing (wow, takes ya back, huh?). Everyone hated her so they poked fun of her weight and her constant eating on the phone tapes she made. They went for her weight because they knew she'd be personally vulnerable in that respect. Unless they thought she was some kinda super patriot...then they poked fun of Monica Lewinsky's weight. They hated her first, then hit her where it hurt. Like Britney Spears in this thread. I'm not a fan, but Jesus, just admit you hate her already...don't gin up a lot of nonsence about her cunt. I'm shocked at the negative reactions in this thread. It looked fine to me.

Evil Captor
11-30-2006, 08:36 PM
So, most normal vaginas are dripping wet? That would be typical? Most women who aren't nasty looking don't have any rolls of fat?

I don't mean to harp on this, but I just wish that people would admit that they want to make fun of Britney and call her ugly and gross and a skank regardless of what she looks like, instead of insisting that this normal-if-not-above-average-looking woman somehow is ugly, fat, or whatever.

EXCELLENT post. The levels of hypocrisy around here set off my BS meter like an air raid siren.

devilsknew
11-30-2006, 08:37 PM
Looks like a perfectly normal vag to me. Honestly, body image among women is bad enough-now we have to worry about how long our naughty bits are? Is there a standard? Are we going to start seeing plastic surgery on cooches, so they look "proper?"


Well, labiaplasty is a big fad right now. Many women are having it done and it is a big money maker for Plastic Surgeons and a relatively easy and low risk surgery. The Pussy Fixers of this New Millenium are like the Titty Makers of the early eighties. It's gone From Gold in them thar hills to Gold in the Mine (so to speak).

I wouldn't be surprised if there isn't some young woman out there right now who took these flashing pictures of Spears to a Plastic Surgeon and has an appointment for a Britney Pussy Lift and Sculpting, as we speak.

Caridwen
11-30-2006, 08:44 PM
I thought her fan base was 13-23 year olds. More on the younger side, like pre-teens. Am I wrong? How does this go over with parents buying her CD's for kids?

I don't think enough about her to hate her but I'd be mortified if there were pictures of me around like this that my kids would one day see. Since she did the same thing like three days in a row it's doubtful that it's an accident. Is this the kind of PR that people really want?

I just wonder what goes through someone's mind to know that photographers are standing there taking your picture and you jump in a car with no underwear on spread eagle for the world to see.

devilsknew
11-30-2006, 08:54 PM
I have to admit, I would have been more turned on had it been a boobieflash. It's just not that sexy.

Now boobies, those have a personality. Britney's Vagina is just kind of a Wallflower. Not even some character. She needs some bling-bling for that Pussy. Maybe some stick on sequins and a big Platinum labial barbell with 5 Kts of Diamonds.

Malienation
11-30-2006, 09:18 PM
Labiaplasty? Bah! That's for the merely vain. Now, for full-blown batshit crazy, you wanna go for anal bleaching.

yojimbo
11-30-2006, 09:19 PM
Whatever, haters. I'd still do her, and I'm pretty sure I'm not alone.
Alone? Are you mad? There are millions upon millions of us. If she was a nobody she'd still be a very shaggable girl.

She a gobshite, that is without question but a very doable one. She nothing special but she's a good looking girl and anyone that says different is a fucking liar IMO.

Astroboy14
11-30-2006, 09:43 PM
Resolved: she's a skank.

But little Astroboy informs me that the punani looks just fine...

alice_in_wonderland
11-30-2006, 10:33 PM
1. Britney is a ho-bag. She can call her self "country" all she want's but she's still a ho-bag.

2. "accidential" crotchy shots are sooooo, 1994.

3. There's nothing, whatsoever, wrong with Britney's crotch, weight or looks. I think her bits look perfectly normal (not that I'm an expert), and it strikes me as absurd that anyone would say otherwise. I mean, women, pick up a mirror and look at your crotch at various angles with varying degrees of leg splayage and the thing kinda moves around. What a bizarre thing to criticize her for, particularly when there are so many REAL things to criticize her for.

Cisco
11-30-2006, 10:34 PM
If we could get back to the OP for just a second, doesn't she have a standing multi-million dollar offer from Playboy? I can't imagine waving it around town for free makes any sense at all from a career or financial standpoint as long as that offer is on the table. I think she must've been drunk, feeling wild and free from being newly single, and didn't put much thought into going commando in a micro-skirt.

I would be willing to bet that she is intentionally ignoring tabloid stories about herself even more than usual right now, so when she did it the 2nd time she didn't know yet about the 1st offense.

She didn't really do it 3 times, did she? I've only seen 2 photo sets and one was much less egregious than the other.

JRDelirious
11-30-2006, 10:37 PM
Y'know, someone should clue in Brit that the "Teen Ho" look worked for her back when she was a teen. Come on, even Xtina Aguilera has decided she had enough of that schtick. So I must believe (getting back to the OP) that Brit IS an exhibitionist/flasher beyond what you normally expect from someone in this line of work (which would be more along the lines of the ocassional "misappropriated private sex tape" -- yeah, right --, red carpet wardrobe malfunction, and skin-mag spread, all set up to look just right while doing it). If you're gonna be an exhibitionist, at least try to come across as a fabulous one, not as crass trash.


As to the body-image discussion that has taken over the thread, must say that BS is above-the-median in terms of conventional attractiveness (and her body type is far more normal than Paris' ), only that admittedly the difference between when she is in top tour form, with all makeup/hair/clothes/diet/workout cylinders firing, and her "off days" look, CAN be a bit startling. For someone who just did two pregnancies in quick succession she's not doing badly body-wise, but yes, she's kinda careless WRT to appearance maintenance when not actually performing, more so than you'd expect of someone who CAN afford to have the babies cared for while she takes care of herself.
The particular intimate part is not hideous at all, it's just run-of-the-mill if you ask me. Like someone else said, what do you want, it's a hoohah, not modern scupture. BUT, I guess that's the thing: it's average. It kills the fantasy; it looks like something you would not mind seeing next Friday night at home... but kind of a let-down to find on a big-time sex-symbol celeb at the clubs, vs. the expectation that if a celeb will go through the trouble of flashing her proof-of-gender she'd have it all primped and preened for a public appearance (but heck, she often looks like she made little effort at ANY part of her appearance...).

mhendo
11-30-2006, 11:33 PM
You do have a good point here. I really don't think about it that way when I'm commenting on someone like Britney, but I see where it could be interpreted that way. I'll be the first to admit that I'm hung up on perfection, and that's an uncool way to look at anyone, even Britney.
It's beautifully appropriate that the link you provided on the first page is to a website called "The Superficial."

Indygrrl
11-30-2006, 11:41 PM
It's beautifully appropriate that the link you provided on the first page is to a website called "The Superficial."

Heh, well, that's where all the good gossip is! And how else do we view our celebrities if not on a superficial level? We don't actually know them, so it's impossible to make an accurate assessment of their real personality. It's much easier to pick apart photos and other silly shit.

(At least I can concede to someone else's point instead of explaining further why I don't like looking at Brit's pieces. ;) )

mhendo
11-30-2006, 11:49 PM
Heh, well, that's where all the good gossip is! And how else do we view our celebrities if not on a superficial level? We don't actually know them, so it's impossible to make an accurate assessment of their real personality. It's much easier to pick apart photos and other silly shit.

(At least I can concede to someone else's point instead of explaining further why I don't like looking at Brit's pieces. ;) )Actually, when i said it was appropriate, i was comparing the title of the website with the content of your posts in this thread.

Indygrrl
12-01-2006, 12:22 AM
Actually, when i said it was appropriate, i was comparing the title of the website with the content of your posts in this thread.

Oh, so you're calling me superficial? Gotcha. :rolleyes: Pretty sad when you can't even talk about vapid celebrities without getting criticized. Count me in with the millions of people who take celebrity gossip as entertainment and a laugh, nothing more. I don't think Britney's pretty, oh how horrible I must be.

Chronos
12-01-2006, 01:50 AM
If we could get back to the OP for just a second, doesn't she have a standing multi-million dollar offer from Playboy? I can't imagine waving it around town for free makes any sense at all from a career or financial standpoint as long as that offer is on the table. I think she must've been drunk, feeling wild and free from being newly single, and didn't put much thought into going commando in a micro-skirt.I think it's a lot more clever than that. If she took Playboy up on their offer, she'd earn multi-millions now, but the parents who buy her CDs for their teenagers wouldn't, any more. Her future earning potential would plummet. With something like this, though, she gets nearly as much publicity as she would from a Playboy shoot, but she can still claim it was accidental, to placate the parents. Yeah, it's a pretty thin claim, but then, so is "I wear skintight leather onstage because it's comfortable", and folks bought that one. Not, mind you, that I'm claiming that Ms. Spears herself is this clever, just that her handlers are.

And I'm one of those, incidentally, who thinks that she's well below the 50th percentile in appearance. The problem isn't her features, or her body, or for that matter, her nether regions (which look about how one would expect, given the pose and camera angle). The problem is that she hardly ever smiles. Sure, I'll notice great breasts, or great legs, or a great butt, but all of those pale in importance compared to a great smile.

Guinastasia
12-01-2006, 02:15 AM
Chronos, I doubt many parents or kids do buy her CDs nowadays-she hasn't had an album out in years, and these days, Britney is going the way of Debbie Gibson and New Kids on the Block.

DiosaBellissima
12-01-2006, 02:34 AM
Britney's fan base was 12-15 when she came out in 1998. I was one of them.

Now I'm 20. I prefer my entertainment slightly more adult than when I was 12-15. Sure, I'm sure she's got some young fans still, but I'd imagine most of them grew up with her.

DiosaBellissima
12-01-2006, 02:35 AM
Oh, I should note: I also am adult enough that I wouldn't stop buying her CDs if she flashed her cooch or posed in Playboy. Heaven knows I'd even go out and buy the issue.

Of course, all of this stems from my horrible taste in music :)

MrDibble
12-01-2006, 05:27 AM
Personally, I happen to like large dangling labia. As there seems to be porn for just about every fetish, I don't know why it's so hard for me to find dangling labia porn.

I happen to like the the sensation, while performing oral sex on a woman, of having flaps of labia suctioned onto either cheek. Gimme labia that'll tickle my earlobes, and I'd be in heaven!

Come to South Africa. It's a Khoikhoi ... errmmm...speciality, I can attest:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Elongated_labia

Tuckerfan
12-01-2006, 05:27 AM
You know, when she was jailbait, I never really saw the appeal of her. As she got older, I still didn't care. When I saw the "stoner" clip of her on Youtube, I realized that if I was alone with her on a tropical island, I'd rather poke a hole in a coconut, stuff it full of bananas and screw that. The vage shots don't do anything to change my opinion. Britney's not hideous, but she benefits greatly from plastic surgery, make up, and professional trainers. Give me someone who doesn't spend the bulk of their time and money trying to cover up their flaws/getting in shape, and has a brain, any day,

Scoundrel Swanswater
12-01-2006, 05:39 AM
You know, when she was jailbait, I never really saw the appeal of her. As she got older, I still didn't care. When I saw the "stoner" clip of her on Youtube, I realized that if I was alone with her on a tropical island, I'd rather poke a hole in a coconut, stuff it full of bananas and screw that. The vage shots don't do anything to change my opinion. Britney's not hideous, but she benefits greatly from plastic surgery, make up, and professional trainers. Give me someone who doesn't spend the bulk of their time and money trying to cover up their flaws/getting in shape, and has a brain, any day,
Hear, hear !!
Count me in as someone who thinks Britney is not an attractive woman at all.
She has a great body when she is in peek condition and she has great hair stylists and makeup artists, but under all that is an ugly, dumb girl.
And no, I don't hate Britney.

DianaG
12-01-2006, 06:14 AM
Britney's not hideous, but she benefits greatly from plastic surgery, make up, and professional trainers. Give me someone who doesn't spend the bulk of their time and money trying to cover up their flaws/getting in shape, and has a brain, any day,
She has a great body when she is in peek condition and she has great hair stylists and makeup artists, but under all that is an ugly, dumb girl.
I'm pretty indifferent to Britney, but in fairness, I've got to say that she wasn't the one who chose to spend most of her time and money fixing up her looks, her mom was. Well, her mom spent both her time and Brit's, and Brit's money, but you see what I'm saying. As soon as she could get clear of that woman, it was all Red Bull, Cheetos, bare feet and Federline.

I don't think she's ugly, I think she's utterly average looking. And yeah, dumb as a post. And completely lacking in taste or class. But I do have some sympathy for the girl, because I think she's been pretty horribly exploited by almost everyone who should have been watching out for her.

None of this, of course, excuses the crotch shots, let alone the fact that she appears to have picked through Lil Kim's trash for that bag of hair.

Biggirl
12-01-2006, 07:00 AM
The levels of hypocrisy around here set off my BS meter like an air raid siren.
Hypocrisy? I seem to be only one of two posters here who happen to think Britney's bits looked dangly and I would like to see where it is this hypocrisy comes into play. Are you suggesting I covert dangly bits privately while decrying them publicly?

How am I setting off your BS meter? Are you saying that I actually think her bits look normal in that picture and I'm lying when I say they look weird to me?

Because I could be wrong but I'm not lying nor being a hypocrit.

pseudotriton ruber ruber
12-01-2006, 07:40 AM
She has a great body when she is in peek condition.
p-e-A-k. Of course, she's in peek condition, too.

chowder
12-01-2006, 07:52 AM
Hey guys, It's a minge!.

They come in all shapes, sizes and various colours.

I'd still give her one anyway, then again I'm not a picky bloke

Qadgop the Mercotan
12-01-2006, 08:11 AM
As a man who's examined thousands of vaginas in my career as a family physician, I have to say this thread is filled with a lot of wrong ideas about what is normal and what is not.

DianaG has it right.

Cisco
12-01-2006, 08:23 AM
I think it's a lot more clever than that. If she took Playboy up on their offer, she'd earn multi-millions now, but the parents who buy her CDs for their teenagers wouldn't, any more. Her future earning potential would plummet. With something like this, though, she gets nearly as much publicity as she would from a Playboy shoot, but she can still claim it was accidental, to placate the parents. Yeah, it's a pretty thin claim, but then, so is "I wear skintight leather onstage because it's comfortable", and folks bought that one. Not, mind you, that I'm claiming that Ms. Spears herself is this clever, just that her handlers are.

And I'm one of those, incidentally, who thinks that she's well below the 50th percentile in appearance. The problem isn't her features, or her body, or for that matter, her nether regions (which look about how one would expect, given the pose and camera angle). The problem is that she hardly ever smiles. Sure, I'll notice great breasts, or great legs, or a great butt, but all of those pale in importance compared to a great smile.
Anyone who thinks her "handlers" talked her into waving her wee-woo in front of the paparazzi is reading way too much into this IMO. I just can't accept that it was planned.

you with the face
12-01-2006, 08:56 AM
I've never gotten the hype about BS's looks. She's not ugly, but she's not HAWT!!!1, either. On a good day she looks like someone you'd see at the mall in any predominately white college town. Got the generic cutes that come with youth and money, but not the kind of beauty that I imagine would incite suicidal envy or lightning bolts ala The Godfather, when Michael was sequestered in Italy.

devilsknew
12-01-2006, 10:42 AM
Britney's fan base was 12-15 when she came out in 1998. I was one of them.

Now I'm 20. I prefer my entertainment slightly more adult than when I was 12-15. Sure, I'm sure she's got some young fans still, but I'd imagine most of them grew up with her.

Oh, I should note: I also am adult enough that I wouldn't stop buying her CDs if she flashed her cooch or posed in Playboy. Heaven knows I'd even go out and buy the issue.

Of course, all of this stems from my horrible taste in music



Isn't this kind of par for the course for most girls in Britney's early and current fanbase, the ones who are around 20 and in college right now? I mean, isn't it kind of en vogue to be flashing one's rudebits for whatever digital imaging device that happens to be around? Or otherwise taking sexy and provocative photos for Interweb posting? Seems to be part of your generation's culture.

Maybe this will actually endear her to her fanbase... see, she's just like us, you go girl! (I could be wrong, though.)

or maybe I'm wrong.

Lord Ashtar
12-01-2006, 10:47 AM
How am I setting off your BS meter? Are you saying that I actually think her bits look normal in that picture and I'm lying when I say they look weird to me?
Just a guess, but I assume he was referring to the comments about her "rolls of fat". You know as well as anyone that anytime someone even remotely picks on someone else's weight around here, the cries of "But s/he could have a thyroid condition!" are deafening.

Cat Whisperer
12-01-2006, 10:56 AM
<snip> I just can't accept that it was planned.
It might not have been planned, but it was no more accidental than Janet Jackson's boob making its appearance at the Super Bowl. Let me assure you that sober adult women know the public state of their private bits at all times. Now, the *sober* part for both of those two might be debatable...

DianaG
12-01-2006, 11:23 AM
As might the "adult". Chronologically maybe, but developmentally?

Lissa
12-01-2006, 11:34 AM
I would be willing to bet that she is intentionally ignoring tabloid stories about herself even more than usual right now, so when she did it the 2nd time she didn't know yet about the 1st offense.

Personally, I think that the crotch-shots had to be intentional. It doesn't even look comfortable to get into a car that way. Even if the first ones were accidental, the second ones couldn't have been. Even if she doesn't read her press clippings, you'd think that her publicist or some friends would have told her about the photos. "Hey, I don't mean to embarass you or anything, but I thought you should know . . ."

Britney is used to being photographed from all angles and thus I have a hard time believing that she doesn't realize what will show in a picture.

Biggirl
12-01-2006, 11:46 AM
Just a guess, but I assume he was referring to the comments about her "rolls of fat". You know as well as anyone that anytime someone even remotely picks on someone else's weight around here, the cries of "But s/he could have a thyroid condition!" are deafening.

Ah! I didn't see any rolls of fat.


As for Britney's looks in general--- I think she's very pretty. Normal pretty. A great role-model type of pretty. She gains some weight, works at losing it. She has acne, works at not having it or hiding it. She's not impossibly tall or thin or impossibly anything. Just a very attainable pretty.


She proves that even regular looking girls can grow up to be rich skanks. Because, weird looking twat or not, displaying it as she has is skanky.

Vinyl Turnip
12-01-2006, 11:53 AM
Oh, so you're calling me superficial? Gotcha. :rolleyes: Pretty sad when you can't even talk about vapid celebrities without getting criticized.

Those that live by the snatch die by the snatch?

I don't think Britney's pretty, oh how horrible I must be.

Nah, your level of horribleness---whatever that may be----is probably incidental to your condemnation of Britney.

But having seen photos of both you and Ms. Spears, I'd just say that with all due respect, mileages do vary!

mhendo
12-01-2006, 12:10 PM
Oh, so you're calling me superficial? Gotcha. :rolleyes: Pretty sad when you can't even talk about vapid celebrities without getting criticized. Count me in with the millions of people who take celebrity gossip as entertainment and a laugh, nothing more. I don't think Britney's pretty, oh how horrible I must be.Actually, it had less to do with any specific comments about Spears, than with your apparent obsession with the beauty and (alleged) "perfection" of yourself and your co-workers. Also your refusal to concede that, in the big picture, Spears can hardly be considered fat, and her nether regions look perfectly normal given the angle and position they were photographed in.

Captain Lance Murdoch
12-01-2006, 12:26 PM
How would this be different if K-Fed and gone commando and "forgot" zip up the barn door? I'd image a guy walking around with his unit hanging out would stand a good chance of ending up in the pokey.

Still not looking at the BS beaver shots, by the way. That's for the same reason I don't want to see Screech doing the dirty sanchez.

corkboard
12-01-2006, 01:41 PM
Whenever I hear about one of the pop-tarts-du-jour acting like this, I can't help but think that she's someone's daughter. From what little I know of Spears' family, she has a mother that evidently loves her, supports her career, and a little sister that hopes to be some sort of performer someday. Those people live amongst the rest of society- see their neighbors, go grocery shopping, go to church, community events, etc. They must be mortified when their skank daughter acts in this manner. They must constantly be thinking, "everyone I encountered today knows that Britney's my daughter (or sister, whatever the case), and they know that she's acting like a world-class trollop."

It must be mortifying to be related to these girls.

RumMunkey
12-01-2006, 01:48 PM
Meh.. at least there was no string.

DianaG
12-01-2006, 01:49 PM
I wouldn't so much say that her mother "loves her and supports her career" as "pimps her spends her money". Her younger sister doesn't so much "hope to be some sort of performer someday" as "currently has a show on Nickelodeon, since her mother decided to go the Hillary Duff route rather than the Tiffany route with this one".

Like I said, I'm no fan of Brit's, but I think most of her problems can be laid at the feet of that family you're so worried about her embarrassing.

silenus
12-01-2006, 01:54 PM
Even the paparazzi think she's a tramp. (http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,233446,00.html) :D

astro
12-01-2006, 01:59 PM
I think it's a lot more clever than that. If she took Playboy up on their offer, she'd earn multi-millions now, but the parents who buy her CDs for their teenagers wouldn't, any more. Her future earning potential would plummet. With something like this, though, she gets nearly as much publicity as she would from a Playboy shoot, but she can still claim it was accidental, to placate the parents. Yeah, it's a pretty thin claim, but then, so is "I wear skintight leather onstage because it's comfortable", and folks bought that one. Not, mind you, that I'm claiming that Ms. Spears herself is this clever, just that her handlers are.

And I'm one of those, incidentally, who thinks that she's well below the 50th percentile in appearance. The problem isn't her features, or her body, or for that matter, her nether regions (which look about how one would expect, given the pose and camera angle). The problem is that she hardly ever smiles. Sure, I'll notice great breasts, or great legs, or a great butt, but all of those pale in importance compared to a great smile.

She has a thick, strong bull neck (http://www.bastardly.com/archives/2005/03/03/britneys-huge-ass-neck/). I suspect she would be good on plow.

you with the face
12-01-2006, 02:17 PM
She has a thick, strong bull neck (http://www.bastardly.com/archives/2005/03/03/britneys-huge-ass-neck/). I suspect she would be good on plow.

I read the comments on that link and I didn't know if some of them were being facetious or not.

Do people really find neck creases sexy?

corkboard
12-01-2006, 03:21 PM
I wouldn't so much say that her mother "loves her and supports her career" as "pimps her spends her money". Her younger sister doesn't so much "hope to be some sort of performer someday" as "currently has a show on Nickelodeon, since her mother decided to go the Hillary Duff route rather than the Tiffany route with this one".

Like I said, I'm no fan of Brit's, but I think most of her problems can be laid at the feet of that family you're so worried about her embarrassing.
I'm not as well versed in Britney's familial relationships as you, and I don't know what "since her mother decided to go the Hillary Duff route rather than the Tiffany route with this one" means, but my point was this- acting like a tramp obviously has an effect on her own career, whether that effect is positive or negative. But chances are there are some relatives somewhere- evidently not her mother or sister- whose reputation and community standing will be sullied by this type of self-obsessive behavior. I can't imagine the family that felt sincere pride at her earlier success in life feels the same way about her now.

DianaG
12-01-2006, 03:28 PM
I'm not as well versed in Britney's familial relationships as you, and I don't know what "since her mother decided to go the Hillary Duff route rather than the Tiffany route with this one" means, but my point was this- acting like a tramp obviously has an effect on her own career, whether that effect is positive or negative. But chances are there are some relatives somewhere- evidently not her mother or sister- whose reputation and community standing will be sullied by this type of self-obsessive behavior. I can't imagine the family that felt sincere pride at her earlier success in life feels the same way about her now.
Believe me, I'm not proud. :D

Hillary Duff = Tween Actress
Tiffany = (80s) Pop Tart

Oh, I'm sure someone's ashamed of her. After all, every family has it's black sheep, and in Brit's family, I imagine that person is the one with the brains to be ashamed of her.

Beware of Doug
12-01-2006, 04:07 PM
As soon as she could get clear of that woman, it was all Red Bull, Cheetos, bare feet and Federline.Nothing wrong with bare feet.
Cheetos are also good in moderation.

Little Nemo
12-01-2006, 04:09 PM
I don't see anything wrong with Britney's vagina as a vagina. I just think it's abnormal in the sense that we've all seen it and are therefore able to offer our opinions on it.

lowbrass
12-01-2006, 04:23 PM
You look at that and tell me it is not grotesque. Maybe I'm fortunate enough to only see pretty pussies, but in my experience that is NOT how a healthy vagina looks. And she IS flabby, that is not an exaggeration, it is right there in front of you.

Looks pretty much like a vagina to me. I never thought of vaginas as looking "pretty" anyway, but hers looks pretty normal. It sure wouldn't bother me if it were on my face. :D

Biggirl
12-01-2006, 04:30 PM
Nothing wrong with bare feet.
Cheetos are also good in moderation.


Except when they're in a gas station rest room. The feet, not the Cheetos.


I think those pictures of Britney walking in and out of that highway gas station bathroom in her bare feet skeeved me out more than even her spreading her legs for the press.

Little Nemo
12-01-2006, 05:17 PM
It sure wouldn't bother me if it were on my face.
Well, maybe, but it would help the rest of us if you'd wear a scarf or something when you go out in public.

Lemur866
12-01-2006, 05:47 PM
Except when they're in a gas station rest room. The feet, not the Cheetos.
Yeah, actually the Cheetos too.

But bare feet in a gas station rest room? You know, nothing makes me more glad to be the possessor of a penis than a gas station rest room. You don't want to touch ANYTHING.

Cisco
12-01-2006, 07:04 PM
You look at that and tell me it is not grotesque. Maybe I'm fortunate enough to only see pretty pussies, but in my experience that is NOT how a healthy vagina looks. And she IS flabby, that is not an exaggeration, it is right there in front of you. I'd still like to know what you were looking at when you said that. This statement just does not make sense. Not a single picture I've seen has said anything one way or the other about her vagina, primarily because we can't see the damn thing. This is like bashing someone's rectal health after seeing their (perfectly normal) buttcheeks.

Regarding her flabbiness, yeah, she's a little bit flabby. She's also a mother of 2 and one of them was born less than 3 months ago. Considering those circumstances I would say she looks outstanding. I honestly think you've been drinking way too much haterade while posting to this thread, Indygrrl.

Some of this has already been said but I feel like it needs to be repeated that she is not, and has not been for a long time, a role-model for 12 year old girls. Today's 12 year old girls were 4 (and perhaps 3, depending on their birthdate) when Britney burst onto the pop scene wearing a schoolgirl outfit and singing and dancing provocatively, and they were 7 or 8 the last time she had a big hit. If they care about her at all they probably think she's an old hag. Speaking of which, Britney is almost 25. She hasn't been a young, sweet, innocent role model since her Mickey Mouse Club days before anyone heard of her. Saying she's acting like a bad role model for the 12 year olds or destroying her good image or anything along those lines is a falacious argument.

Indygrrl
12-01-2006, 07:41 PM
Regarding her flabbiness, yeah, she's a little bit flabby. She's also a mother of 2 and one of them was born less than 3 months ago. Considering those circumstances I would say she looks outstanding. I honestly think you've been drinking way too much haterade while posting to this thread, Indygrrl.

Lol, I don't hate her. And yeah, it is very normal for a mom to have extra weight, c-section scars, etc., etc., but most do not go around giving crotch shots to the paparazzi and therefore do not get criticised for these things. I never said that Britney had a hanging pussy or whatever, that was Biggirl. I just think it looks icky. And after thinking about it I came up with the theory that a lot of women might think other women's bits look bad, a. because we are heterosexual and not turned on by female genetalia, and b. because we haven't seen very many up close and personal except for in porn or what's between our own legs. Guys are going to view it a lot differently.

Look, I go to the gym and see all types of bodies in that locker room, and you know what? To me they are all beautiful. I wouldn't even think to criticize anyone there, big or small, toned or flabby. But, I am critical of myself (and why should that bother anyone but me?) and I am a little critical of some of the ladies I work with (in my own head, never out loud). That's not hypocritical, IMO, because I am willing to go under scrutiny as a condition of my work environment, and so are the other ladies who work there. It's a highly superficial environment, and some of that does seep into the psyche, wrong or not. I never thought that by criticizing Britney-fucking Spears I'd be putting myself out there for you guys to jump on. But please, say whatever you want to about me. I know that you don't know me, and I'm fine with who I am whether y'all like me or not.

Cisco
12-01-2006, 07:50 PM
But please, say whatever you want to about me. I know that you don't know me, and I'm fine with who I am whether y'all like me or not.
Oh behave yourself. I don't think I even implied that I don't like you, and I certainly never said it. I just think you're being unusually harsh on Britney. Her hey-nanner-nanner looks fine to me.

Antinor01
12-01-2006, 07:59 PM
I've only seen a few vaginas in my life. All of those were in porn (I hate when gay porn websites have ads for straight porn, but that's another whine) and presumably....umm displayed to their best advantage. I don't think any of them are anything to look at, being gay I'm a tad biased but I really really don't get what anyone sees in them.

Indygrrl
12-01-2006, 08:05 PM
Oh behave yourself. I don't think I even implied that I don't like you, and I certainly never said it. I just think you're being unusually harsh on Britney. Her hey-nanner-nanner looks fine to me.

Ah, not you, just a few others who have decided to name-call in this thread.

Biggirl
12-01-2006, 08:20 PM
Please, let's not let Britney's baby-spitter get between the Teeming millions. We all can have differing opinions about the normalness of it (although the court of opinion has spoken and the answer is 'quite normal') but do not give it the power to drive us apart.


Let us look at it-- gawk, even-- and then put it back where it belongs. In between Britneys legs. Or, failing that, wrapped around some gold-digging gigolo's well travelled member.

Guinastasia
12-01-2006, 10:02 PM
Whenever I hear about one of the pop-tarts-du-jour acting like this, I can't help but think that she's someone's daughter. From what little I know of Spears' family, she has a mother that evidently loves her, supports her career, and a little sister that hopes to be some sort of performer someday. Those people live amongst the rest of society- see their neighbors, go grocery shopping, go to church, community events, etc. They must be mortified when their skank daughter acts in this manner. They must constantly be thinking, "everyone I encountered today knows that Britney's my daughter (or sister, whatever the case), and they know that she's acting like a world-class trollop."

It must be mortifying to be related to these girls.



You know very little indeed. Her mother was the classic stage-mom, whoring her and Jamie Lynn out to every audition she could, micro-managing her life, and encouraging her daughter to dress up like jail-bait to attrack the sleazy older men.


So she reaps what she sows.

I say it's pretty damned sad when I'm starting to think that K-FED should be the one winning the custody battle.

DiosaBellissima
12-01-2006, 10:16 PM
You know very little indeed. Her mother was the classic stage-mom, whoring her and Jamie Lynn out to every audition she could, micro-managing her life, and encouraging her daughter to dress up like jail-bait to attrack the sleazy older men.

Really? Britney has done interviews where she says her mom want even watch half of her videos because they are too sexual. Like, I'm a Slave for You- her mom wouldn't speak to her for a few weeks after she did that one.

bouv
12-01-2006, 10:24 PM
Really? Britney has done interviews where she says her mom want even watch half of her videos because they are too sexual. Like, I'm a Slave for You- her mom wouldn't speak to her for a few weeks after she did that one.

Well, just because her mom might have pushed her into this stardom, doesn't mean she has to approve of everything she does in it. She might have wanted Britney to be more like a Mandy Moore, still fairly sweet and innocent.


Ironincally enough, the current song on my roommates's winamp is, I kid you not, "Slave for You." Almost cosmic in a weird sort of way.

Scotticher
12-01-2006, 10:25 PM
I feel bad for her.

I think that this crotch showing stuff has to be intentional. I haven't seen any of it, but if she did it three times in the past week? She had to be doing it with the knowledge that it was going to be photographed. Therefore, she wanted to be photographed showing her private parts to the world. That doesn't show very good judgment, as many of you have pointed out. She must think that this is a good career move, that is all I can think of that might explain this whole thing. I'm not thinking she was thinking straight when this appeared to her to be a good idea.

But the thing is, she married a man who already had a woman pregnant with their second child when she met him. He was, according to what little I have read, running around spending her money like it was an unending fountain. He appeared to be more interested in partying than in spending time with his family. She got pregnant very soon after giving birth to her first child.

This girl is obviously not overly laden with common sense.

NONE of this is rational. I know she has a mother, and maybe her mom tried to talk her out of marrying this man. Maybe her mom has tried to talk her out of all of the rest of the stupid stuff she has done. But....it seems to me that she is still operating under the misapprehension that she is a "golden girl" and that nothing she does is wrong. She is in for a rude awakening one of these days.

I feel bad for her. And for her kids.

GargoyleWB
12-01-2006, 10:39 PM
...At least it doesn't look a wizards sleeve...

I don't think this analogy is getting enough of the thundering adulation it deserves. :D

Cisco
12-01-2006, 10:45 PM
I don't think this analogy is getting enough of the thundering adulation it deserves. :D
Because it was already old before we heard it again in Borat.

Cisco
12-01-2006, 10:54 PM
I feel bad for her.

I think that this crotch showing stuff has to be intentional. I haven't seen any of it, but if she did it three times in the past week? She had to be doing it with the knowledge that it was going to be photographed. Therefore, she wanted to be photographed showing her private parts to the world. That doesn't show very good judgment, as many of you have pointed out. She must think that this is a good career move, that is all I can think of that might explain this whole thing. I'm not thinking she was thinking straight when this appeared to her to be a good idea.

But the thing is, she married a man who already had a woman pregnant with their second child when she met him. He was, according to what little I have read, running around spending her money like it was an unending fountain. He appeared to be more interested in partying than in spending time with his family. She got pregnant very soon after giving birth to her first child.

This girl is obviously not overly laden with common sense.

NONE of this is rational. I know she has a mother, and maybe her mom tried to talk her out of marrying this man. Maybe her mom has tried to talk her out of all of the rest of the stupid stuff she has done. But....it seems to me that she is still operating under the misapprehension that she is a "golden girl" and that nothing she does is wrong. She is in for a rude awakening one of these days.

I feel bad for her. And for her kids.
I still think you're all overreacting and reading WAY too much into this. It makes no sense for her to do this on purpose because she was already all over the headlines for being on the verge of a "classy comeback". Anyone could predict that crotch shots would get her called a slut and cause her setbacks and that is exactly what is happening. I don't know why you guys think any PR person would really be that galactically fucking stupid.

Regarding your pity for her - I really think you can can it. She doesn't need it. I grew up in the south and I was born the same year as Britney and let me tell you that she is not that out of the ordinary. The only difference between Britney Spears and 80% of the cute girls I grew up with is that Britney is worth millions. Hardly in need of sympathy from strangers.

She'll be just fine. Trust me.

Guinastasia
12-01-2006, 11:22 PM
Really? Britney has done interviews where she says her mom want even watch half of her videos because they are too sexual. Like, I'm a Slave for You- her mom wouldn't speak to her for a few weeks after she did that one.


Perhaps, but her mom definitely started her out on that path.

I don't feel sorry for her-yes, she's stupid, and yes she's basically uneducated. But she's had numerous people offer her advice and she's shunned it all. And hanging out with PARIS HILTON?

Honey, you have two kids at home-THOSE are the people who have my sympathy. Not Britney.

Scotticher
12-01-2006, 11:30 PM
I still think you're all overreacting and reading WAY too much into this. It makes no sense for her to do this on purpose because she was already all over the headlines for being on the verge of a "classy comeback". Anyone could predict that crotch shots would get her called a slut and cause her setbacks and that is exactly what is happening. I don't know why you guys think any PR person would really be that galactically fucking stupid.

And...where did I say that a PR person had anything to do with her bad decisions? What I actually SAID is that she makes bad choices. Which I think she does, and probably over the loud objections of her parents and her PR persons.

Regarding your pity for her - I really think you can can it. She doesn't need it. I grew up in the south and I was born the same year as Britney and let me tell you that she is not that out of the ordinary. The only difference between Britney Spears and 80% of the cute girls I grew up with is that Britney is worth millions. Hardly in need of sympathy from strangers.

I don't think she needs my "pity" and I never said she DOES need my pity. I feel bad for her. I don't need to can it. It is how I feel, and I have a right to feel it. I think she is making bad choices and I feel bad for her. Which, by the way? Isn't pity. It is sympathy. If you don't choose to think I should feel sympathy for her, that is your choice. I'll feel it, one way or the other.

She'll be just fine. Trust me.

I hope so.

What, exactly, is your problem with me?

Scotticher
12-01-2006, 11:36 PM
I still think you're all overreacting and reading WAY too much into this. It makes no sense for her to do this on purpose because she was already all over the headlines for being on the verge of a "classy comeback". Anyone could predict that crotch shots would get her called a slut and cause her setbacks and that is exactly what is happening. I don't know why you guys think any PR person would really be that galactically fucking stupid.

And...where did I say that a PR person had anything to do with her bad decisions? What I actually SAID is that she makes bad choices. Which I think she does, and probably over the loud objections of her parents and her PR persons.

Regarding your pity for her - I really think you can can it. She doesn't need it. I grew up in the south and I was born the same year as Britney and let me tell you that she is not that out of the ordinary. The only difference between Britney Spears and 80% of the cute girls I grew up with is that Britney is worth millions. Hardly in need of sympathy from strangers.

I don't think she needs my "pity" and I never said she DOES need my pity. I feel bad for her. I don't need to can it. It is how I feel, and I have a right to feel it. I think she is making bad choices and I feel bad for her. Which, by the way? Isn't pity. It is sympathy. If you don't choose to think I should feel sympathy for her, that is your choice. I'll feel it, one way or the other.

She'll be just fine. Trust me.

I hope so.

What, exactly, is your problem with me?

Scotticher
12-01-2006, 11:38 PM
Sorry, I have absolutely NO IDEA how that happened.

Biggirl
12-01-2006, 11:43 PM
Scottie, don't let the power of the poontang overtake you! Do not let it be divisive. Do not let it work it's evil magic on you.

I plead with you and not with Cisco because I know you well enough to see that you are not yet completely under it's sway. You are not like him. He has let the meat flaps invade his psyche and is lashing out. There is still hope for you--- do not surrender!

Scotticher
12-02-2006, 12:07 AM
Scottie, don't let the power of the poontang overtake you! Do not let it be divisive. Do not let it work it's evil magic on you.

I plead with you and not with Cisco because I know you well enough to see that you are not yet completely under it's sway. You are not like him. He has let the meat flaps invade his psyche and is lashing out. There is still hope for you--- do not surrender!

Thanks, darling. Not much danger of that happening.

I got tinfoil, and I am not afraid to USE it.

Cisco
12-02-2006, 12:22 AM
What, exactly, is your problem with me?
Besides your condescending tone?

My memory on what I said is a little fuzzy but I seem to recall it went exactly like this: I still think you're all overreacting and reading WAY too much into this. You're all. That means you are all. That means not just Scotticher. Although, now that you mention it, I think the reading way too much into things part was probably accurate.

mhendo
12-02-2006, 12:39 AM
I just think it looks icky. And after thinking about it I came up with the theory that a lot of women might think other women's bits look bad, a. because we are heterosexual and not turned on by female genitalia, and b. because we haven't seen very many up close and personal except for in porn or what's between our own legs. Guys are going to view it a lot differently.So, let me get this straight.

First, you say that Britney's bits look "like roast beef" (post #3), "dried up" (post #12), and "grotesque" (post #18).

In support of your expertise and qualifications on this topic, you tell us that you are "fortunate enough to only see pretty pussies," and that "in [your] experience that is NOT how a healthy vagina looks" (post #18). We also learn that you work with "about 50 women" whose "pussies ain't skeery like that" (post #29).

So, you lay claim to expertise about pussies based on the fact that you see "pretty pussies" on a regular basis.

Now, after being criticized for your position, you excuse it by noting that you, as a heterosexual woman, are "not turned on by female genitalia," and that women like you might find other women's pussies "icky" because you "haven't seen very many up close and personal except for in porn or what's between our own legs."

So, which is it?

Are you an expert in pussies, someone who sees pussies all the time and is therefore qualified to judge Britney's pussy? Or are you a novice in pussies, who thinks Britney's pussy is icky because you don't have any real experience with pussies.I never thought that by criticizing Britney-fucking Spears I'd be putting myself out there for you guys to jump on.You can pretend this is about Britney if you like, but the criticism leveled at you in this thread has been about you. It's not that you've criticized Spears that i find annoying; plenty of others have done that. It's that you've spent considerably more time criticizing her (perfectly normal) physique than criticizing her behavior. But please, say whatever you want to about me. I know that you don't know me, and I'm fine with who I am whether y'all like me or not.You're right that we don't know you. We only know what you post here. Can't really make judgments based on anything else, can we?

And it's not really about liking or not liking you either. I'm not on some vendetta here. I recently commiserated with you, and defended you, in the thread about your wedding photographer. But your posts in this thread seemed, to me at least, shallow and self-absorbed, and more concerned with making some point about how you and your co-workers are models of physical perfection, than anything else. Is that what you're really like? I don't know. But if this thread were my sole source of contact with you, it's probably the conclusion i'd leap to.

Cisco
12-02-2006, 12:46 AM
I feel bad for her.Condescending.
I think that this crotch showing stuff has to be intentional. I haven't seen any of it, but if she did it three times in the past week? She had to be doing it with the knowledge that it was going to be photographed. Therefore, she wanted to be photographed showing her private parts to the world.
Based on false pretense. She has done it twice - not three times - which has been pointed out if you had bothered to read the thread.
That doesn't show very good judgment, as many of you have pointed out.Parroting.
She must think that this is a good career move, that is all I can think of that might explain this whole thing. I'm not thinking she was thinking straight when this appeared to her to be a good idea.
Based solely on your (IMO wrong) presumption that this was intentional.
But the thing is, she married a man who already had a woman pregnant with their second child when she met him. He was, according to what little I have read, running around spending her money like it was an unending fountain. He appeared to be more interested in partying than in spending time with his family.Judgemental. She got pregnant very soon after giving birth to her first child. Judgemental.
This girl is obviously not overly laden with common sense.Judgemental and rude.
NONE of this is rational. I know she has a mother, and maybe her mom tried to talk her out of marrying this man. Maybe her mom has tried to talk her out of all of the rest of the stupid stuff she has done.Presumptuous. But....it seems to me that she is still operating under the misapprehension that she is a "golden girl" and that nothing she does is wrong. She is in for a rude awakening one of these days.Judgemental, presumptuous, and condescending.
I feel bad for her. And for her kids.
Condescending.


This is why your post rubbed me the wrong way. I'm annoyed at this thread in general because of the extent that the claws are out, and I'm even more appalled that it's mostly women trashing her - or in your case, Scotticher, well, see above.

Indygrrl
12-02-2006, 01:34 AM
And it's not really about liking or not liking you either. I'm not on some vendetta here. I recently commiserated with you, and defended you, in the thread about your wedding photographer. But your posts in this thread seemed, to me at least, shallow and self-absorbed, and more concerned with making some point about how you and your co-workers are models of physical perfection, than anything else. Is that what you're really like? I don't know. But if this thread were my sole source of contact with you, it's probably the conclusion i'd leap to.


Alright, this is all I'm going to say on the matter, I acknowledged that it was wrong to judge someone (even Britney) so harshly. That was somewhere on page 2. It was after I said those things about her crotch shots. And my theory about why women might not like the looks of her snatch is perfectly valid. It's true that I have seen a lot of better looking snatches than Britney's. That doesn't mean I'm a fucking gynecologist.

I said that I was hung up on perfection, but I never said that I was perfect or that anyone I know is perfect. I only said that I work with a lot of ladies who look better than Britney. And that is true. None of them are perfect, but they have it over a washed up pop star. IMO, that's not terribly difficult to do. Most of us are pretty rigorous in our workout regimens and beauty routines---because our job depends on it. That doesn't mean any of us think we are perfect, in fact, you'd probably find us to be more critical of ourselves than of each other or of random people

And I've said more than once that I don't judge people on their physical appearances, with the exception of the stars of the celebrity gossip pages. It never occurred to me to worry about harming the egos of strangers by commenting on Britney Spears. I'll be sure to keep my mouth shut when she decides to spread 'em again, well, at least on this forum.

Tuckerfan
12-02-2006, 04:25 AM
As a man who's examined thousands of vaginas in my career as a family physician, I have to say this thread is filled with a lot of wrong ideas about what is normal and what is not. See, this is the kind of thing that convinces me the medical system is an absolute crock! Most men are willing to pay to see vage, and you guys have the audacity to charge for it! ;)

Cartooniverse
12-02-2006, 07:21 AM
Where the eagles cry, on a mountain high?

We have our winner, all the way back in post # 25.

I got tears, man. :D

It tells us all we need to know about her. Not that this is a news flash. Her coin of realm is her sexual parts. Pity.

History is full of very sexy crooners of the vagina-toting persuasion, and none of them felt the need to air out their holies of holies in public.

Trashy is as trashy does.

Cartooniverse

Little Nemo
12-02-2006, 07:46 AM
History is full of very sexy crooners of the vagina-toting persuasion, and none of them felt the need to air out their holies of holies in public.
Madonna, Courtney Love, Mariah Carey, Lil Kim, Tori Amos have all made their business public before Spears did.

C K Dexter Haven
12-02-2006, 08:35 AM
::: Moderator blows whistle for attention ::: Hey, everyone: COOL IT. This is Cafe Society, and this thread is about Britney Spears. It is NOT a thread about other posters. Most of you involved in this cat-fight have a couple thousand posts to your name, and you know better than to hurl personal insults in Cafe Society.

You can pretend this is about Britney if you like, but the criticism leveled at you in this thread has been about you. I'm not going to read back through all four pages to figure out who started it, but it's ending, and NOW. You want to critique Indygrrl, you do it in the Pit Forum, not here. In this forum, comments are acceptable if directed at what people say, but not when they are directed at the personalities of other posters.

I'm not recording this in the Moderators' files, I'll take it as a hiccough in the fabric of space-time, but it's stopping and stopping fast.

Footnote: Cisco seems to be criticizing what's posted, not the poster, and that's on the OK side of the line, although I haven't read the whole thread.

SkipMagic
12-02-2006, 08:51 AM
Whoa!

This is Cafe Society, and not the Pit, and some of you are coming pretty close to Pit behavior. Remember that Cafe Society is the forum to discuss and criticize artists and their works; leave the criticisms of other posters in the Pit. Please keep in mind that the personality of the poster (http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?p=6769918#post6769918) is not relevant to the discussion.

So, calm down and get back to discussing Brittany and her, er... yeah.

SkipMagic
12-02-2006, 08:52 AM
Damn you, Dex!

(Which is a comment about the artistry and timing of his moderation intervention, and not Dex himself. ;))

chowder
12-02-2006, 12:52 PM
Whoa!

This is Cafe Society, and not the Pit, and some of you are coming pretty close to Pit behavior. Remember that Cafe Society is the forum to discuss and criticize artists and their works; leave the criticisms of other posters in the Pit. Please keep in mind that the personality of the poster (http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?p=6769918#post6769918) is not relevant to the discussion.

So, calm down and get back to discussing Brittany and her, er... yeah.

So now we gotta talk about France?

Guinastasia
12-02-2006, 12:54 PM
So now we gotta talk about France?

As in, I see London, I see France, I see Britney's got no underpants?

:p

chowder
12-02-2006, 01:03 PM
No, as in Brittany as posted by SkipMagic

Cat Whisperer
12-02-2006, 01:46 PM
Heh - "baby-spitter." Hee.
Guin, I mentioned this thread to my husband yesterday, with the comment, "She's making K-Fed look like the classy one." :eek:

I always wonder about the friends and families of stars involved in public bad behaviour, too. Even if Britney's mom is as big a piece of work as she is, she must have relatives somewhere who are normal, cringing people. Imagine Britney's old grandma - surfing the net, tra-la-la, then OHMIGOD! That's my grandbaby's hooha! Didn't anybody ever teach that girl ANYTHING?!

Sternvogel
12-03-2006, 12:18 AM
Imagine Britney's old grandma - surfing the net, tra-la-la, then OHMIGOD!

No need to worry on that specific account -- both of Britney's grandmothers are dead, although one grandfather is still around. (http://www.celebritywonder.com/html/britneyspears.html)

Chronos
12-03-2006, 03:33 PM
In the interests of making this thread a touch more literary, in honor of this forum, I offer this gem from the song "Doin' what comes natur'lly", in Annie Get your Gun:You don't have to mix with the Vanderbilts
Not to take off your panties when you're wearing kilts
That comes natur'llyBut then, maybe mixing with old money isn't the best route to acting natur'lly, in the first place.

Cartooniverse
12-03-2006, 10:47 PM
Only in The Straight Dope do we invoke the spirit of Ethel Merman vis a vis Brittany Spears.

My god. Eve will get a touch of the vapors when she finds out that Brittany reminds me of Lillian Gish. :D

Cartooniverse

chowder
12-04-2006, 03:42 AM
Only in The Straight Dope do we invoke the spirit of Ethel Merman vis a vis Brittany Spears.

My god. Eve will get a touch of the vapors when she finds out that Brittany reminds me of Lillian Gish. :D

Cartooniverse

So a region of France reminds you of Britney ....strange.



sorry, couldn't resist that

corkboard
12-04-2006, 08:46 AM
Madonna, Courtney Love, Mariah Carey, Lil Kim, Tori Amos have all made their business public before Spears did.
Wait- what??? Tori? I had no idea.

Cat Whisperer
12-04-2006, 10:05 AM
Yes, but Tori did it to empower herself and all womynkind. Britney did it because she forgot she had no panties on.

(I'm just bs'ing - I have no idea about either one of them.)

Guinastasia
12-04-2006, 12:38 PM
I have no problem with nudity, depending on the context. Posing for pictures-such as artists, or even porn, if that's what you want, go for it. And there's nothing inherantly dirty or gross about the human body.

BUT...when you're out in public, to start flashing the paps just to get attention is just so very trashy. It screams-I have no concept of what's acceptable. I just want to get everyone talking about ME!!!

Little Nemo
12-05-2006, 02:02 AM
Wait- what??? Tori? I had no idea.
Tori Amos was performing a few years back (in Melbourne, Australia as I recall) and was wearing a relatively short skirt. When she sat down at the piano stool and spread her legs, it became clear that the skirt was all she was wearing below the waist. Photos were taken and I assume a minute or two of googling will allow anyone to confirm this story.

Cartooniverse
12-05-2006, 08:15 AM
BUT...when you're out in public, to start flashing the paps just to get attention is just so very trashy. It screams-I have no concept of what's acceptable. I just want to get everyone talking about ME!!!

Paps? This is a new one on me. Then again, I grew up on the other side of the state and perhaps that's Pittsburghese, like "Rhedd up a room". :D

Cat Whisperer
12-05-2006, 10:18 AM
I think Guin meant "paparazzi." But I could be wrong - it could be the newfangled slang for a so-called lady's so-called private parts.

dropzone
12-05-2006, 10:25 AM
Photos were taken...Something I've noticed is how often starlets, princesses, and John Kerry's daughter don't seem to realize that what seemed well shadowed under normal lights can become fully illuminated under the glare of a photographer's strobe. The result can be interesting, titilating, or just funny, but I hope they continue to be clueless.

Guinastasia
12-05-2006, 06:14 PM
I think Guin meant "paparazzi."


I did indeed.

Cartooniverse
12-06-2006, 05:57 PM
I did indeed.

My apologies- that word was new to me.

Acsenray
12-21-2006, 05:51 PM
Okay, I think I'm the only one in the world now who hasn't seen pictures of Britney's privates. The link offered in post No. 18 no longer seems to be operative. Does anyone know whether these pics are still available on the Internet? A Google Image search doesn't seem to be very helpful. Maybe I'm not doing it right.

Rubystreak
12-21-2006, 09:44 PM
This is why your post rubbed me the wrong way. I'm annoyed at this thread in general because of the extent that the claws are out, and I'm even more appalled that it's mostly women trashing her - or in your case, Scotticher, well, see above.

What is so wrong about feeling sorry for Britney? I mean, not too sorry, she's totally loaded, but... she married a jerky guy, though I think she loved him. She had two kids, which takes its toll on the body and the mind. Now she's getting divorced, and she's reeling. She makes friends with someone who isn't a particularly good pal for a new mom, and now she's puking in gutters and flashing cooch.

I think Britney's pretty miserable right now and she's behaving very badly. Rather than heap scorn and loathing upon her, I just feel pity. I mean, everyone in the free world has seen her pussy. When her son is 12, you know one of his snot-nosed peers is going to print out that picture and tape it to his locker. But it's condescending to feel sorry for that kid?

Whatever. Her pussy looks nothing like roast beef. End of story.

pseudotriton ruber ruber
12-21-2006, 09:48 PM
I mean, everyone in the free world has seen her pussy. I never thought I'd envy the North Koreans.

yoyodyne
12-21-2006, 10:30 PM
Okay, I think I'm the only one in the world now who hasn't seen pictures of Britney's privates. The link offered in post No. 18 no longer seems to be operative. Does anyone know whether these pics are still available on the Internet? A Google Image search doesn't seem to be very helpful. Maybe I'm not doing it right.www.egotastic.com/entertainment/celebrities/britney-spears/britney-spears-pussy-oh-the-humanity-001928

Scotticher
12-23-2006, 12:26 AM
What is so wrong about feeling sorry for Britney?

Apparently? It is "judgemental, presumptuous, and condescending" to look at a very public person's behavior and have an opinon about it. And to feel sympathy for that person, since in your "judgemental, presumptuous, and condescending" opinion? They are not using very good judgment in the way they are behaving. And that they won't be happy about it later, when looking back on it.

I guess I should have just called her a slut or something. That wouldn't have been what I was thinking, but apparently feeling "bad" for her wasn't acceptable. I'm STILL trying to wrap my mind around THAT one. In my spare time. Which is quite limited, but still....every once in awhile, I ponder it.

I'll try to correct my behavior in the future. Err...well, no. I won't. I'd much rather feel "bad" for a person than call them a slut. Especially since I didn't THINK she was being a slut, I just think she is making bad choices.

And BTW? I C&P'd that"Judgemental, presumptuous, and condescending" stuff. Any spelling errors there aren't mine. unless there are some in the rest of my post. Always a possibility. Just so you know. :D

dropzone
12-23-2006, 01:03 AM
History is full of very sexy crooners of the vagina-toting persuasion, and none of them felt the need to air out their holies of holies in public.Not true. We just didn't have the internet to show them off back then. For instance, Pearl Bailey started out in a club where singers were expected to pick up their tips from tabletops with their nether lips; Billie Holiday first got called "Lady" because she wouldn't. (Wish I still had the references but my wife threw them out--BIG surprise!--but Pearlie Mae did some nude modeling you can find if you look) Then there was the original of Marilyn Monroe's (granted, not a singer but endlessly sexy and she did wear that sewn-on dress when she sang at JFK's b-day party.) photo as she risked an air embolism while standing over the subway vent. They redid it for "The Seven Year Itch" with panties.

Cisco
12-23-2006, 01:10 AM
And BTW? I C&P'd that"Judgemental, presumptuous, and condescending" stuff. Any spelling errors there aren't mine. unless there are some in the rest of my post. Always a possibility. Just so you know. :D
:rolleyes: Always damning in some way, you busy-body holier-than-thou types.

You know I was right and that's why you reported me and that's why it took you three weeks to fabricate some way to criticize me after the mods disagreed with you.

Spelling errors my ass.

Scotticher
12-23-2006, 01:30 AM
:rolleyes: Always damning in some way, you busy-body holier-than-thou types.

You know I was right and that's why you reported me and that's why it took you three weeks to fabricate some way to criticize me after the mods disagreed with you.

Spelling errors my ass.

Just for the record, I have never reported a post in my life.

And no, I don't think you were right, so I had no need to fabricate anything. And your ass spelled wrong.

Have a nice day.

dropzone
12-23-2006, 01:43 AM
[imaginary and wholy undeserved mod hat]

Hey, you two, cool it or take it to the Pit! I mean, you're arguing over Britany Spears' PUSSY, fercryinoutloud! GET A GRIP!

[/imaginary and wholy undeserved mod hat]

Scotticher
12-23-2006, 01:50 AM
Hey...how could I pit a person after I told him to have a nice day?

That would just be...RUDE!

dropzone
12-23-2006, 02:02 AM
And you, my love, can NEVER be rude? I mean, how can we be friends/admirers of 6+ years standing if you were incapable of rudity or, at least, catiness?

Scotticher
12-23-2006, 02:16 AM
IF I were capable of being rude, I'd point out that there are two t's in cattiness. But I'm not, so I won't.

:D

Acsenray
12-23-2006, 08:29 AM
www.egotastic.com/entertainment/celebrities/britney-spears/britney-spears-pussy-oh-the-humanity-001928

Thanks, yoyodyne, but all the pics on that site are censored with big red and yellow stars.

Cisco
12-23-2006, 11:19 AM
Just for the record, I have never reported a post in my life.

And no, I don't think you were right, so I had no need to fabricate anything. And your ass spelled wrong.

Have a nice day.
There are spelling errors in your post, too, but the rest of the content content is rude, catty, and moronic enough that I could type all day and never mention them. You, on the other hand, couldn't think of any other way to attack me after 3 weeks, because you know I'm right. Get over it or take it to the pit, but at least stop trying to egg me on in this forum.

Rubystreak
12-23-2006, 11:29 AM
Apparently? It is "judgemental, presumptuous, and condescending" to look at a very public person's behavior and have an opinon about it. And to feel sympathy for that person, since in your "judgemental, presumptuous, and condescending" opinion? They are not using very good judgment in the way they are behaving. And that they won't be happy about it later, when looking back on it.

I don't think you said anything wrong. Just so you know. I feel sorry for Britney too, in a mild, 'I don't know her or really care' kinda way. I think she's sorta having a very public nervous breakdown, and she and her family are going to feel badly about it for a long time after we've all forgotten it. I don't think there's anything judgemental about expressing sympathy in a situation like that. I can't believe that you are getting slammed here for being mean to Britney when others are scrutinizing and judging the attractiveness of her labia majora, and finding them lacking, for god's sake.

So don't worry, Scotticher. At least one other person feels as you do. This thread has gone off the rails on the crazy train, but reality check-- feeling sorry for someone who is obviously hurting, even if you don't like or even respect that person, is not wrong to do. It's called compassion, and if you have to get some feeling worked up about a celebrity you don't know, that's not a bad one to go with.

I guess I should have just called her a slut or something.

Or trash, or roast beef pussy. THAT would be par for the course. Actually feeling something human for her? UNACCEPTABLE! You monster! :p

Cisco
12-23-2006, 11:41 AM
Or trash, or roast beef pussy. THAT would be par for the course. Actually feeling something human for her? UNACCEPTABLE! You monster! :p
:rolleyes: Maybe one of you two yentas could read my posts in this thread before continuing to trash me any further. That would be great.

Cartooniverse
12-23-2006, 01:03 PM
Where else would we find the word " pussy " and the word "yenta" on the same page?

:D

Me, I'd think the photographer who snapped these timeless labial images should feel pretty crappy about cashing the paycheck that week. Then going home. To his wife and daughter.

" Hey, Daddy, what did you get to photograph this week??? " :rolleyes:

Who's the whore here?

C K Dexter Haven
12-23-2006, 05:12 PM
:rolleyes: Maybe one of you two yentas could read my posts in this thread before continuing to trash me any further. That would be great.

> DING! DING! DING! < ::: Moderator rings Salvation Army bell for attention.

There have been two Moderators, practically simultaneously, reminding you that comments about other posters are NOT appropriate in this forum. You want to insult each other, go the Pit, that's what it's for.

I do not have time or energy to figure out who started this, but I'm stopping it, and NOW.

So far, I'm not recording any of this. Yeah, this is an Official Warning, but it applies to the lot of you. Next person to trash another poster gets a nasty whack on the back on the shins with my cane.

'Tis the season to be jolly.... and there was something about the season of good will, too, IIRC. So, play nice, dammit.


PS - Just for the record, I have never reported a post in my life. You say this like you're proud of it? Is there some approbrium attached to reporting a post? If you hear someone prowling around your yard at night, do you "handle it yourself" or do you call the cops? Moderators can't be everywhere and can't see everything, and we rely on your help in reporting spammers and other violations. There's no shame in doing it; to the contrary, you win the applause of your fellow posters and the moderators.

twickster
12-23-2006, 06:02 PM
....Is there some approbrium attached to reporting a post? ....
No, just opprobrium. **angelic smiley**

twicks, who rats people out all the time.

Scotticher
12-23-2006, 09:36 PM
Is there some approbrium attached to reporting a post?

Not at all. I just haven't ever done it. MY BAD, I guess. My comment was a response to the suggestion that I had reported a post and had not gotten the response I wanted.

My apologies for the part I played in this childish game of....whatever it was.

yoyodyne
12-23-2006, 10:01 PM
Thanks, yoyodyne, but all the pics on that site are censored with big red and yellow stars.Not if you click on them.

Acsenray
12-24-2006, 07:33 AM
Not if you click on them.

Ah. :smack: