Johnny L.A.
03-02-2007, 10:04 AM
A couple of weeks ago a friend told me that seismologists were predicting a large earthquake in the PNW, specifically around Southern British Columbia. He said that the seismologists had been tracking earthquakes along a fault line and that the quake is expected 'soon'.
Now, as a native Southern Californian I know that earthquakes happen all of the time. Most are too small to feel. Most of the rest are minor. A few cause damage. Predicting earthquakes anywhere on the Ring of Fire is like predicting the weather. You know it's going to rain, but you may be off on the timeframe. And, speaking of the timeframe, specific earthquake predictions have been notoriously unreliable.
So was there in fact a study that predicted a large earthquake in the PNW within a certain timeframe in the near future?
Now, as a native Southern Californian I know that earthquakes happen all of the time. Most are too small to feel. Most of the rest are minor. A few cause damage. Predicting earthquakes anywhere on the Ring of Fire is like predicting the weather. You know it's going to rain, but you may be off on the timeframe. And, speaking of the timeframe, specific earthquake predictions have been notoriously unreliable.
So was there in fact a study that predicted a large earthquake in the PNW within a certain timeframe in the near future?