The Assailant
11-22-2000, 08:27 AM
I'd like you all to listen to my wonderful discovery. (Movie compression may already use this technique, which will make me look quite stupid, but here is my idea.)
Basically, I understand that a "movie" is actually many still pictures played back quickly, making it look like actual "motion". These images are stored in groups of pixels. Well, if you'll notice, from one frame to another, many pixels will remain precisely the same color that they were in the last frame. They don't change. Well, my idea is, rather then save each image of a movie, you only save the "motion". If one pixel remains exactly the same color from one frame to another, then you simply do not save any data for it. The software program then realises that no data has been saved for this "pixel", and it will automatically know to leave it the same color that it was in the last frame.
Do video compressionists already use this technique? Am I behind the times? Or is this a breakthrough?
Basically, I understand that a "movie" is actually many still pictures played back quickly, making it look like actual "motion". These images are stored in groups of pixels. Well, if you'll notice, from one frame to another, many pixels will remain precisely the same color that they were in the last frame. They don't change. Well, my idea is, rather then save each image of a movie, you only save the "motion". If one pixel remains exactly the same color from one frame to another, then you simply do not save any data for it. The software program then realises that no data has been saved for this "pixel", and it will automatically know to leave it the same color that it was in the last frame.
Do video compressionists already use this technique? Am I behind the times? Or is this a breakthrough?