View Full Version : Kings 3/29
vivalostwages
03-30-2009, 01:32 PM
Ah, now we know why the King's son doesn't have a steady girl.
The Queen is aware of her husband's mistress, isn't she? Does she also know about the kid?
Captain Amazing
03-30-2009, 02:47 PM
Ah, now we know why the King's son doesn't have a steady girl.
Well, didn't the King chew him out in the first episode about how he was (paraphrased) a goddamned disappointment and how he wishes the rumors about Jack and all the girls were true, because at least then he wouldn't be a stinking homo? That was the gist of it, anyway.
Well, didn't the King chew him out in the first episode about how he was (paraphrased) a goddamned disappointment and how he wishes the rumors about Jack and all the girls were true, because at least then he wouldn't be a stinking homo? That was the gist of it, anyway.
What gets me is how much of a hypocrite Silas is. He was going on about how "we give up what we want when we want power" and he keeps a mistress and an illegitimate son.
IvoryTowerDenizen
03-30-2009, 03:21 PM
I missed what happened at the end- after Silas said "Serenity has ended" (or such) and went into the hospital room. Anyone want to clue me in?
thirdwarning
03-30-2009, 04:07 PM
Apparently he went into the room and waited until the boy woke up. When it seemed that the child (Seth?) would be okay he kissed him and then he left. I don't think he's coming back. I think this is what he's sacrificing to keep his kingdom, or for the peace.
Mr. Excellent
03-30-2009, 05:11 PM
What gets me is how much of a hypocrite Silas is. He was going on about how "we give up what we want when we want power" and he keeps a mistress and an illegitimate son.
Yah, but he'd rather have an open relationship with them. He'd rather have married his mistress.
carnivorousplant
04-05-2009, 08:56 PM
5 April 2009.
"There is no evidence against Reverend Whoyswitchit and Whatshisname. Should some be manufactured?"
Cool.
vBulletin® v3.7.3, Copyright ©2000-2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.