PDA

View Full Version : Sleeping Gas Theory


lcripe
04-13-2009, 08:35 AM
There is a rumor going around in our area that thieves are breaking into
peoples houses at night, gasing the occupants and then robbing the
house. The belief is that the robbers are using some sort of gas that
keeps the owners deeply asleep while the robbery takes place. My
questions is whether or not there is any type of gas that would do
this? It is a sort of "sleeping gas" theory. I am not aware of such a
substance and am skeptical that such a thing exists. What is the
straight dope on this dope?

Best and thanks,

Lloyd Cripe

flodnak
04-13-2009, 09:37 AM
Oh, my, this is an old story! I'm sure people who know more about these things will be along soon, but the short answer is no, no such gas has yet been discovered. Anesthesiologists would LOVE it if it did.

The simple, scary truth is that burglars can be very, very quiet.

Lanzy
04-13-2009, 09:40 AM
I hope the burglars are making enough to pay for this probably very expensive gas.

jayjay
04-13-2009, 09:47 AM
Ooh! A modern-day Mad Gasser of Mattoon (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Mad_Gasser_of_Mattoon)! Cool...alert the Fortean Times!

beowulff
04-13-2009, 10:13 AM
The Russians tried this, and killed 120 hostages: http://www.cognitiveliberty.org/dll/knockoutgas2.htm

flodnak
04-13-2009, 10:43 AM
Ah! I found an article I saved from the Usenet newsgroup alt.folklore.urban years ago - seriously, it's dated 1996. In this case, this discussion was about robbers allegedly pumping sleeping gas into compartments of overnight trains in, I believe, Russia. The article points out several problems with that theory:

All known anesthetic gases are heavier than air. You'd have to flood the whole sleeping compartment, or in this case the house, in order to make sure the people were knocked out. That's a hell of a lot of gas.

The margins are very small between risking someone waking up, and killing everybody.

You don't get knock-out gas and not know about it. Most will leave a nasty smell, and all will leave you feeling woozy, groggy, or worse when you wake up.

Gas masks don't filter out sleeping gas. How are the robbers getting through this, with portable respirators?

This doesn't stop many people, including police departments, from believing it. In 1999 we were travelling in Germany and stopped for the night at a hotel located in a Rasthof on some Autobahn or another. When we came out to our car the next morning, someone had placed a leaflet under the windshield wiper, explaining in charmingly bad English that we should not attempt to sleep in a car or camper in the parking lot because of the risk of robbers with gas. While I suspect the hotel was at least a willing partner in this, the leaflet claimed to be from the local police department. And I'd heard it before, and have heard it since, in many other places, often with a stamp of approval from the police.

But it's still impossible.

Claptree
04-13-2009, 10:54 AM
There have been several robberies in Sweden and other parts of Europe where people sleeping in their caravans, camper vans or truck cabs at rest stops have been robbed. Many report dry mouths, confusion and nausea, drawing the conclusion that they've been gassed.

As for the gas being expensive and unusable, the head of the Swedish Defense research Institute considers it quite possible to use carbon dioxide, which is both cheap and easy to get a hold of. One truck driver reports waking up from his newly installed CO2 alarm and seeing people running away carrying a gas tube.

It wouldn't work in a situation like the Russian hostage crisis, and there is a real risk of killing the intended robbee, but I'd say it's quite doable.

Article in Swedish, sorry. (http://www.transport.se/home/trp2/tidn/home.nsf/pages/122CFFF92095F404C1256D1D00454795)

Another Swedish article, here (top) (http://www.flisa.nu/nyhetsarkiv2003.php) reports findings of hexane in blood tests taken after a highway robbery.

Mostly hearsy, I freely admit, but I'd say it's not impossible.

Claptree
04-13-2009, 10:57 AM
As for gas masks, you could always ventilate the enclosed space, or if it's CO2, be quick about your business. It'd be enough to make sure the victims sleep more deeply.

lcripe
04-13-2009, 12:44 PM
Ah! I found an article I saved from the Usenet newsgroup alt.folklore.urban years ago - seriously, it's dated 1996. In this case, this discussion was about robbers allegedly pumping sleeping gas into compartments of overnight trains in, I believe, Russia. The article points out several problems with that theory:

All known anesthetic gases are heavier than air. You'd have to flood the whole sleeping compartment, or in this case the house, in order to make sure the people were knocked out. That's a hell of a lot of gas.

The margins are very small between risking someone waking up, and killing everybody.

You don't get knock-out gas and not know about it. Most will leave a nasty smell, and all will leave you feeling woozy, groggy, or worse when you wake up.

Gas masks don't filter out sleeping gas. How are the robbers getting through this, with portable respirators?

This doesn't stop many people, including police departments, from believing it. In 1999 we were travelling in Germany and stopped for the night at a hotel located in a Rasthof on some Autobahn or another. When we came out to our car the next morning, someone had placed a leaflet under the windshield wiper, explaining in charmingly bad English that we should not attempt to sleep in a car or camper in the parking lot because of the risk of robbers with gas. While I suspect the hotel was at least a willing partner in this, the leaflet claimed to be from the local police department. And I'd heard it before, and have heard it since, in many other places, often with a stamp of approval from the police.

But it's still impossible.
Thanks for the post. Could you send me the link to the article that you quote? Thanks, Lloyd Cripe

HorseloverFat
04-13-2009, 01:28 PM
If such an easy to administer gas existed we'd be using it in hospitals and in hostage situations. As someone linked above, the Russian special forces use a strong nerve gas and even with their budget and expertise werent able to save 120 hostages.

The wikipedia entry on general anesthesia has more info:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_anesthesia#General_anaesthesia

Baracus
04-13-2009, 01:48 PM
If such an easy to administer gas existed we'd be using it in hospitals and in hostage situations.
To be fair, there is a difference between making an already sleeping person sleep soundly enough not to notice you stealing their stuff and putting a conscious person to sleep, quickly and involuntarily in the hostage example and to the point where you can cut them open without waking them in the case of surgery.

Claptree
04-13-2009, 02:56 PM
To be fair, there is a difference between making an already sleeping person sleep soundly enough not to notice you stealing their stuff and putting a conscious person to sleep, quickly and involuntarily in the hostage example and to the point where you can cut them open without waking them in the case of surgery.

Indeed. It doesn't have to be instantaneous, undetectable or safe.

Reply
04-13-2009, 04:25 PM
As for gas masks, you could always ventilate the enclosed space, or if it's CO2, be quick about your business. It'd be enough to make sure the victims sleep more deeply.

I had read somewhere on the internet that an elevated level of CO2, as opposed to a lack of oxygen, is what causes the feeling of suffocation. Is this true? If so, wouldn't that wake the victims up rather suddenly and painfully?

The same sources suggested carbon monoxide or nitrous oxide for inducing unconsciousness, which would supposedly displace the oxygen without inducing the suffocation panic.

HorseloverFat
04-13-2009, 04:35 PM
>Indeed. It doesn't have to be instantaneous, undetectable or safe.

That's fine, but even thieves arent stupid and know enough to keep away from a murder conviction. Something tells me if you ask random people who were robbed recently if they thought they were drugged they would probably think they were and will list a laundry list of symptoms. I say thats confirmation bias and a non-expert opinion until someone produces lab results that confirm exotic chemicals in the room or in their blood.

lcripe
04-13-2009, 04:51 PM
I want to thank all of you that have replied to my question. I also contacted a friend who is both an engineer and medical doctor with a specialty in radiation oncology and asked him the same question. He is a very smart and well educated guy who knows a lot about chemicals. I thought you might be interested in his response. His reply was the following:

...It would be a very impractical way to steal. There is generally a narrow dose range between wakefulness, sleep, brain damage, and death. It would take large amounts of a gas. It would probably be expensive. There would be no way to get an even dose throughout the house. I can't see this as a reasonable option, even with an anesthesiologist on the team. If someone tried it, it would be likely to leave the persons awake or dead, possibly with both occurring in the same house. That would make the news....

Lloyd Cripe

Claptree
04-13-2009, 05:28 PM
That's fine, but even thieves arent stupid and know enough to keep away from a murder conviction. Something tells me if you ask random people who were robbed recently if they thought they were drugged they would probably think they were and will list a laundry list of symptoms. I say thats confirmation bias and a non-expert opinion until someone produces lab results that confirm exotic chemicals in the room or in their blood.

Absolutely, and feeling groggy, confused and having a dry mouth are, at least in my experience, fairly common symptoms of waking up. I'm merely saying it's possible, and doesn't have to be expensive. Of course, I'm mainly talking about gassing very enclosed spaces, like a truck cab, RV or a caravan. A house would be a different story.

As for the lab results, there have been finds of hexane (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hexane) in blood tests done after roadside robberies. Unfortunately, the only cites I've found are in Swedish, but I'll keep looking.

In the meantime, I've translated two articles.

Gas used in roadside robbery (http://www.sr.se/Ekot/arkiv.asp?DagensDatum=2003-08-13&Artikel=273315) 2003-08-13
For the first time, the police have found sleeping gas in blood samples taken from two people that fell victim to road pirates during the summer.

The nightly roadside robberies have increased significantly this year, primarily on the west coast but also along the E4 north of Jönköping. The fact that traces of the petroleum-based gas hexane has been found means that the thefts will now be upgraded to robberies, a worse crime, says Bo Adin, who heads up the preliminary investigation, to Jönköpings-Posten. [Newspaper]

Police squads in Jönköping have been instructed to draw blood samples if gas is suspected. The samples must be drawn quickly because the gas traces quickly disappear from the blood.

Gas used in roadside robbery in Strömstad. (http://www.sr.se/cgi-bin/vast/nyheter/artikel.asp?artikel=658458) 2005-07-16
It was hexane gas that was used in the roadside robbery of an RV outside Strömstad a couple of weeks ago. Blood tests taken from the affected family have now been analyzed by Rättsmedicinalverket. [Department of Forensic Pathology]

Hexane is a neurotoxin that causes unconsciousness. In large doses it can cause serious, permanent damage, according to Göteborgs-Posten. [Newspaper]

There is no suspect in the robbery outside Strömstad. The Police believe several gangs are operating along the E6 on the west coast. A man arrested in Göteborg last Thursday has been detained, under suspicion of involvement in multiple roadside robberies.

So far this year 80 roadside robberies have taken place along the west coast.

ETA: Fixed formatting

YogSosoth
04-13-2009, 06:12 PM
There was a Family Matters episode about this, but they didn't specify the gas. Hmm.

matt
04-13-2009, 07:21 PM
I want to thank all of you that have replied to my question. I also contacted a friend who is both an engineer and medical doctor with a specialty in radiation oncology and asked him the same question. He is a very smart and well educated guy who knows a lot about chemicals. I thought you might be interested in his response. His reply was the following:

...It would be a very impractical way to steal. There is generally a narrow dose range between wakefulness, sleep, brain damage, and death. It would take large amounts of a gas. It would probably be expensive. There would be no way to get an even dose throughout the house. I can't see this as a reasonable option, even with an anesthesiologist on the team. If someone tried it, it would be likely to leave the persons awake or dead, possibly with both occurring in the same house. That would make the news....

Lloyd Cripe

The chances are that your friend is talking about medical anaesthetic gases, halothane and the like. These are both expensive, difficult to obtain, and risky as they depress respiratory function.

If this is being done at all, a likely candidate for the "gas" is premium grade cold starting fluid (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starting_fluid) which forms a volatile aerosol of up to 60% diethyl ether, an early anaesthetic. Ether is one of the safer anaesthetics and might even work as described, but it has a characteristic odour and would be detectable in the victims' blood. It is also an extreme fire hazard, and the idea of filling a room, or worse, a house with an ether-air mixture makes me wince. The slightest spark, such as from a lightswitch, could blow the walls out. Ether was replaced by chloroform as soon as it became available for this very reason.

If gas is being used in this way, I suspect the perpetrators are deluding themselves as to its effectiveness. Criminals are as susceptible to urban legends as anyone else, such as this gentleman who believed lemon juice made him invisible to security cameras (http://gagne.homedns.org/~tgagne/contrib/unskilled.html).

Libre
04-13-2009, 09:15 PM
Not a gas, but theoretically the burglars could blow powdered scopolamine (http://www.biopsychiatry.com/scopolamine/borrachero.html) into their victim's faces while they sleep.

YogSosoth
04-14-2009, 05:33 PM
Slight hijack: Does ether, aka chloroform, work as a gas as effectively as the movies?

It seems all you need to do is pour some in a cloth and hold it over someone's face for 5 seconds and they are out like a light. First off, is that even true? Second, any way to make chloroform into an easily dispensable gas?

matt
04-14-2009, 07:32 PM
Slight hijack: Does ether, aka chloroform, work as a gas as effectively as the movies?

It seems all you need to do is pour some in a cloth and hold it over someone's face for 5 seconds and they are out like a light. First off, is that even true? Second, any way to make chloroform into an easily dispensable gas?

Ether and chloroform are not the same chemical, and no, it doesn't work as in the movies.

From this 1847 account of the introduction of chloroform, from the Lancet: (http://www.general-anaesthesia.com/misc/chloroform.html)

"1. A greatly less quantity of chloroform than of ether is requisite to produce the anæsthetic effect -- usually from a hundred to a hundred and twenty drops of chloroform being sufficient, and with some patients much less. I have seen a strong person rendered completely insensible by seven inspiration of thirty drops only of the liquid.

2. Its action is much more rapid and complete, and generally more persistent. I have almost always seen from ten to twenty inspirations suffice -- sometimes fewer. Hence the time of the surgeon is saved, and that preliminary stage of excitement which pertains to all narcotizing agents, being curtailed, or indeed practically abolished, the patient has not the same degree of tendency to exhilaration and talking.

3. Most of those who know, from previous experience, the sensations produced by ether inhalation, and who have subsequently breathed the chloroform, have strongly declared the inhalation and influence of chloroform to be far more agreeable and pleasant than those of ether."

So we have seven to twenty "inspirations" required from a calm willing "victim". At least thirty seconds of steadily breathing chloroform in and out. You'd have to completely overpower your unwilling victim before chloroforming them - someone fighting back, full of adrenalin, snatching the occasional breath of fresh air, could take forever.


Both ether and chloroform are highly volatile liquids - they could be easily gasified by spraying as a mist of fine droplets. As I mentioned earlier, doing this with ether invites a flash burn or worse.

yabob
04-14-2009, 07:39 PM
Slight hijack: Does ether, aka chloroform, work as a gas as effectively as the movies?

It seems all you need to do is pour some in a cloth and hold it over someone's face for 5 seconds and they are out like a light. First off, is that even true? Second, any way to make chloroform into an easily dispensable gas?
Not AKA - chloroform (trichloromethane) and diethyl ether are two separate compounds:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diethyl_ether
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chloroform

Both were used as anesthetics in the 19th century. Ether was used much more recently - when I was a kid I was given ether to have my tonsils out, though I believe it was kind of unusual, and not that many places were still using it. I've been able to recognize the smell ever since, for instance in cold-weather starter fluid. Based on that experience, I can't see it as an abusable drug - I didn't find it terribly pleasant.

It might work to knock somebody out with a chloroform soaked rag as in the movies, but not in 5 seconds, and you'd stand a good chance of killing them instead. Wiki's take:
It should be emphasized that to induce unconsciousness in an adult human would require almost as much chloroform as it takes to kill an adult human; the lack of precision inherent in administering a drug by inhalation outside of a medical setting makes this practice extremely dangerous as well as unlikely to actually work (given that one would have to restrain the victim for some time; a few whiffs of pure chloroform will only mildly sedate most adults).

YogSosoth
04-14-2009, 08:06 PM
I can't believe movies and TV have lied to me! :(

Now I don't believe in nothing no more!

WarmNPrickly
04-14-2009, 08:08 PM
I think they are pretty sure that the "gas" used in the Moscow theater fiasco was a derivative of fentanyl (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fentanyl). It is not a gas, it is an aerosol. One suggestion is 3-methylfentanyl (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3-methylfentanyl), although given the speed that it had to act, I suspect they would use an even stronger derivative. If this is indeed the anesthetic used, it is tragic mistake of the military not to disclose it to the doctors. Since fentanyl is an opiate, an opiate blocker may have been able so save some lives.

Cerowyn
04-14-2009, 09:03 PM
As for the lab results, there have been finds of hexane (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hexane) in blood tests done after roadside robberies. Unfortunately, the only cites I've found are in Swedish, but I'll keep looking.Wait, they found traces of gasoline in the blood of people who slept near a road? Imagine that!


;)

anson2995
04-15-2009, 08:03 AM
...It would be a very impractical way to steal.
And nobody's mentioned the most obvious impracticality... burglars lugging big gas tanks into somebody's house.

Flodnak is right, the truth is that burglars can be very quiet. People don;t want to believe that someone could have been in their house (or in their room) without them knowing about it.

Qwakkeddup
08-16-2010, 12:56 PM
...It would be a very impractical way to steal.
And nobody's mentioned the most obvious impracticality... burglars lugging big gas tanks into somebody's house.

Flodnak is right, the truth is that burglars can be very quiet. People don;t want to believe that someone could have been in their house (or in their room) without them knowing about it.

I don't know how to cut down the quote, so please forgive me.

Having been in maintenance in apartment buildings, you don't have to be very quiet.
I have replaced toilets, and unclogged sinks, not knowing that someone was asleep in the bedroom.

The policy was to knock really loud at least twice, then unlock the door and open about six inches and announce yourself.

"Maintenance, anybody home, I'm here to fix the so-n-so!"

However, unless the work to be done was in the bedroom, we didn't check if the door was shut.

How did I know if someone was sleeping, when they woke up and found the notice that we had fixed whatever, they invariably called the office to complain that we had been there while they were sleeping.

Then there was the time we were halfway setup to fix the ac, and I noticed movement on the couch. The Boss and I quietly packed back up and left. We really didn't want her to wake up as she was "nekid as a jaybird" and we really didn't want to be there when she woke up. She had slept through the knock, two announcements, and we were talking in normal tones, sifting through tools, the couch was facing away from us, but only standing about 6 ft away.

Colibri
08-16-2010, 02:14 PM
Since there is a newer thread on this subject here (http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?t=574578), I'm closing this one to keep all the responses in one place.

Colibri
General Questions Moderator