Mardi
09-01-1999, 10:23 AM
My wife and I ran into a Catch 22 when we moved to another state. Her employer didn't
make the proper changes to payroll and she went without a check for a good month and a half.
Now the catch 22: She isn't being paid for work, yet is expected to perform daily tasks
that if not performed will wind up in her being dismissed.
Is there a law that woud have allowed her to simply say - I'll work when I get paid and not then be harmed by not performing work for a period of time?
BTW - all is well now, but for a while there we talked seriously about her just siting home but never got up the guts to do it.
------------------
The snozberries taste like snozberries!
make the proper changes to payroll and she went without a check for a good month and a half.
Now the catch 22: She isn't being paid for work, yet is expected to perform daily tasks
that if not performed will wind up in her being dismissed.
Is there a law that woud have allowed her to simply say - I'll work when I get paid and not then be harmed by not performing work for a period of time?
BTW - all is well now, but for a while there we talked seriously about her just siting home but never got up the guts to do it.
------------------
The snozberries taste like snozberries!