VarlosZ
02-05-2010, 04:42 PM
Link (http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?p=12082424#post12082424) to an example.
Presently, if one wishes to start a poll about politics, it needs to go in IMHO because the polling feature is disabled in GD. The problem is that, unless the poll lends itself (http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?t=550492) solely to uncontroversial comments, people are going to want to debate (or at least argue about) the opinions that people are voicing to go along with their votes. But this is verboten in IMHO -- not debating in general, but debating about politics, religion, or anything similarly weighty.
The inevitable result is that every such poll spawns illicit arguments and counter-arguments, each of which must draw some response from an increasingly annoyed moderator. In effect, these threads serve as factories for mod notes, mod admonishments, and mod warnings. Unless the idea is to use these threads as "speed traps" to catch those posters inclined to skirt the rules (which would be clever but counter-productive), it is my opinion that this setup is both nonsensical and unsustainable. People want to post political polls, and people want to have back & forths about the contents of the resulting threads. This isn't a bad thing, so we should find a way to make it possible.
The inelegant solution would be to create sister threads in GD for controversial IMHO polls. The better solution would be simply to enable polling in GD. From personal experience on other boards, I can attest to the fact that having a poll at the top of the thread doesn't hamper discussion.
Presently, if one wishes to start a poll about politics, it needs to go in IMHO because the polling feature is disabled in GD. The problem is that, unless the poll lends itself (http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?t=550492) solely to uncontroversial comments, people are going to want to debate (or at least argue about) the opinions that people are voicing to go along with their votes. But this is verboten in IMHO -- not debating in general, but debating about politics, religion, or anything similarly weighty.
The inevitable result is that every such poll spawns illicit arguments and counter-arguments, each of which must draw some response from an increasingly annoyed moderator. In effect, these threads serve as factories for mod notes, mod admonishments, and mod warnings. Unless the idea is to use these threads as "speed traps" to catch those posters inclined to skirt the rules (which would be clever but counter-productive), it is my opinion that this setup is both nonsensical and unsustainable. People want to post political polls, and people want to have back & forths about the contents of the resulting threads. This isn't a bad thing, so we should find a way to make it possible.
The inelegant solution would be to create sister threads in GD for controversial IMHO polls. The better solution would be simply to enable polling in GD. From personal experience on other boards, I can attest to the fact that having a poll at the top of the thread doesn't hamper discussion.