PDA

View Full Version : This forum requires that you wait 120 seconds between searches.

septimus
08-24-2010, 04:37 AM
If it's not hard to program, a 240-second delay every second search would serve your purpose just as well, I think, and be much less annoying.

I do an average of, perhaps, two searches per week. But the two searches are often back-to-back, due to the need for a correction or refinement.
sandra_nz
08-24-2010, 04:53 AM
If you're searching, use google search instead. These days you can just put 'at boards.straightdope.com' at the end of your google search, you don't even have to go into advanced search options.
Shot From Guns
08-24-2010, 04:07 PM
The syntax I'm familiar with is to append site:boards.straightdope.com to the end of my search.

For example, I could search for searching the SDMB with Google site:boards.straightdope.com and it would only return results from this site.
Arnold Winkelried
08-26-2010, 01:17 PM
How to search the board with google (http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?t=384827)
Guinastasia
08-26-2010, 01:41 PM
If it's not hard to program, a 240-second delay every second search would serve your purpose just as well, I think, and be much less annoying.

I do an average of, perhaps, two searches per week. But the two searches are often back-to-back, due to the need for a correction or refinement.

Wait -- you want to make the wait time longer? :dubious:

Why?
Munch
08-26-2010, 01:44 PM
Wait -- you want to make the wait time longer? :dubious:

Why?

No, he wants the average wait time to be the same.

"240-second delay every second search"
Cheshire Human
08-26-2010, 02:34 PM
I agree this sounds like a good idea. I frequently have to wait to refine my search, because my first search doesn't turn up what I'm looking for. Although I would vote for 3 searches then a 6 minute wait, if this were a democracy.
janeslogin
08-27-2010, 05:03 PM
On the few occasions when I have been foiled by the 120 second rule it has been a typing error and the 240 second delay every second search would have served me just fine.
BigT
09-05-2010, 07:49 AM
On the few occasions when I have been foiled by the 120 second rule it has been a typing error and the 240 second delay every second search would have served me just fine.

Same here--except sometimes the error was choosing threads instead of posts.
NineToTheSky
09-06-2010, 02:31 AM
The problem with using Google is that it doesn't always return complete results. I've just searched for one of my posts, and Google failed. The board's search never fails to find the truth.
AK84
09-06-2010, 06:24 AM
Oye, its better than the 300 second rule we used to have.
psychonaut
09-12-2010, 12:03 PM
The problem with using Google is that it doesn't always return complete results. I've just searched for one of my posts, and Google failed. The board's search never fails to find the truth.Also, with Google you can't restrict the search by username, thread title, posting date, etc. the way you can with the board's own built-in search.
MsWhatsit
09-12-2010, 02:35 PM
The problem with using Google is that it doesn't always return complete results. I've just searched for one of my posts, and Google failed. The board's search never fails to find the truth.Also, with Google you can't restrict the search by username, thread title, posting date, etc. the way you can with the board's own built-in search.

Yes, you can. (http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?p=11650034#post11650034) (This is basically the same link that Arnold Winkelreid provided up-thread, but goes to the specific post.)