RavingMad
09-13-1999, 01:25 PM
I was reading a story in the Washington Post this morning on Brookhaven National Laboratory's Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider and came across this line:
Two beams of those nuclei will scream around a 2.4-mile ring in opposite directions at 99.95 times the speed of light. At impact, conditions will resemble what the universe was like in the first few microseconds of its existence after the Big Bang… - Curt Suplee, Washington Post
Did the author really mean to write that? Are nuclei really moving at 99.95 times the speed of light? Or did the reporter mean to say 99.95 percent the speed of light? If it's the former, I guess I'm fundamentally confused about physics.
If anyone's interested, the story can be found at http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/feed/a53037-1999sep13.htm
------------------
~ Complacency is far more dangerous than outrage ~
Two beams of those nuclei will scream around a 2.4-mile ring in opposite directions at 99.95 times the speed of light. At impact, conditions will resemble what the universe was like in the first few microseconds of its existence after the Big Bang… - Curt Suplee, Washington Post
Did the author really mean to write that? Are nuclei really moving at 99.95 times the speed of light? Or did the reporter mean to say 99.95 percent the speed of light? If it's the former, I guess I'm fundamentally confused about physics.
If anyone's interested, the story can be found at http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/feed/a53037-1999sep13.htm
------------------
~ Complacency is far more dangerous than outrage ~