PDA

View Full Version : Inaccurate science story?


RavingMad
09-13-1999, 01:25 PM
I was reading a story in the Washington Post this morning on Brookhaven National Laboratory's Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider and came across this line:

Two beams of those nuclei will scream around a 2.4-mile ring in opposite directions at 99.95 times the speed of light. At impact, conditions will resemble what the universe was like in the first few microseconds of its existence after the Big Bang… - Curt Suplee, Washington Post

Did the author really mean to write that? Are nuclei really moving at 99.95 times the speed of light? Or did the reporter mean to say 99.95 percent the speed of light? If it's the former, I guess I'm fundamentally confused about physics.

If anyone's interested, the story can be found at http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/feed/a53037-1999sep13.htm


------------------
~ Complacency is far more dangerous than outrage ~

pluto
09-13-1999, 01:32 PM
Yes, it sounds to me like your correspondent got it wrong. Accelerators routinely produce particle speeds approaching the speed of light but this sounds like warp 2 or something. ("Scotty! I need more power!")



------------------
"non sunt multiplicanda entia praeter necessitatem"
-- William of Ockham

AuraSeer
09-13-1999, 02:31 PM
I agree. The correct number could be written as 99.95 percent of c, or 0.9995 times c, but someone got his wires crossed.

----------
3x10^8 cm/s. It's not just a good idea... it's the LAW!

Polycarp
09-13-1999, 03:56 PM
A recent Analog SF magazine tongue-in-cheekedly suggested that a good way to develop FTL drive would be to make 186,282 MPS the speed limit on some stretch of highway, because somebody would be certain to exceed it!! :)

Sofa King
09-13-1999, 05:07 PM
If it's going anything above 1.0c, it's a tachyon, and theoretical. The tachyon has not yet been discovered, except in science fiction.

Undead Dude
09-13-1999, 10:05 PM
The tachyon has not yet been discovered, except in science fiction. -- Sofa King
And by its very nature, we could never discover it (because it would not be able to interact with subluminal particles). Thus we can properly toss tachyons in that circular file labelled "Occam's razor".

Cowboy Greg
09-13-1999, 10:30 PM
Oh, shall I pick that nit?

We interact with subluminal particles all the time.

Superluminal particles might be a bit harder to grab hold of.

------------------
Someday we'll look back on this, laugh nervously, and change the subject....

Cowboy Greg
09-13-1999, 10:31 PM
Ooops. That'll teach me to parse the entire sentence before jumping.

Mea culpa, mea culpa, mea culpa.

::slinks off into shadows::

------------------
Someday we'll look back on this, laugh nervously, and change the subject....

tomndebb
09-15-1999, 05:14 PM
Nice post/sig match. ;)