View Single Post
  #37  
Old 10-06-2016, 01:24 PM
DrDeth DrDeth is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: San Jose
Posts: 34,098
Quote:
Originally Posted by markn+ View Post
This problem is going to produce endless fruitless debate, because, like the boy-girl problem, the specified conditions are ambiguous. The details of the randomization procedure that produced the roll with at least one 6 have not been specified, so there are at least two possible answers, depending on how the roll was produced. I would plead with everyone who is about to reply here with the answer that seems "obvious" to them to read Wikipedia's article on the boy-girl problem first, to save a lot of pointless argumentation.
Yes and here is the relevant quote from Martin Gardner "Gardner argued that a "failure to specify the randomizing procedure" could lead readers to interpret the question in two distinct ways:..."


(spoken in the voice of the Captain) What we got here is failure to specify the randomizing procedure.

Last edited by DrDeth; 10-06-2016 at 01:25 PM.