Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Mindfield
Yowch. That's just crappy. She must have had a lot of work required for a $10k deposit to be needed. Or the roofer just inflated the estimate so he could take off with the cash. (And come on, $10k? That's not even worth fleeing the city for.)
|
Even if the fellow had done the work, at $10,000.00 she would have been hosed. Her house is one of those nice old places by the pond in Acton -- I don't recall the dimensions, but my best guess is that the roof surface is under 1500 sq ft, so 10K was way out of line.
We have a rather obsessive cousin in the Mississauga and Hwy10 area who took up trying to find the roofer for a couple of years, and was was successful in that he did get a couple of contacts for him, but ultimately the trail led south of the border. The contacts (who were also chasing him for similar frauds) indicated that the fellow was broke, so my sister did not pursue it further (e.g. didn't put in the time to get a judgement against him).
At the time, (she' now retired), she was the comptroller for Magna's Karmax plant in Milton, and putting in killer hours at work, so her focus was on her job rather than on her roof when she paid the roofer the deposit that far exceeded what the entire job should have cost. Previously she had had a addition built (by an different contractor) where everything went smoothly, so she made a very mistaken assumption that things would be the same for the roofer.
At the time in my own community (TBay), I was handling a couple of matters concerning roofers. In one, the roofer took a deposit but did not do the work. In the other, a community group advertised for bids to have their roof built, but only one roofer submitted a bit. The group turned down the bid, waited a few months, and asked for another round of bids. This second time around two other roofer made bids, one 42K less than the first round's single bid, and the other 38K less than the first round's single bid. That's when the first round's single bidder sued, claiming that the community group was obligated to accept its first bid. While this was going on, I checked the list of who had issued claims locally in the last few years. The roofer who was suing the community group was on that list repeatedly, so I then looked at the claims. From what I saw, that roofer was in the business of making rediculously high bids on jobs on the assumption that it would be the only bidder on some of those jobs. Then, if there were no other bidders, it would sue, claiming that by virtue of having been the only bidder, it must then have the contract. Needless to say, when I spoke to the roofer about this, the matter settled quickly.
At the same time, another lawyer in town was being sued by a roofer who fell of his roof, despite the roofer having taken on the contract as the general contractor rather than the owner also being the general.
All in all, it's left me wondering "what's the deal with roofers?" I know that if I ever need roof work done, I'll simply pay the extra and go through a reputable general contractor (we represent a few of them), and insist on the general posting a performance bond.