Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-21-2016, 01:46 PM
swampspruce swampspruce is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Cold Lake, Alberta
Posts: 3,716
To The Hydrofoil,Robin!

Before I fell asleep last night my mind was idle and thinking about the Bras D'Or, another of those curious Canadian innovations that seem to constantly fall to the wayside due to politics.It got me thinking about all the advantages of the design and wondered how big a ship could you actually lift out of the water using today's propulsion, modelling and materials technologies?

Could you build a fast freighter the size of a small container ship for example, or a cruise ship (say 50000 tons) version of the Concorde, nautically speaking? Most of what I could find online seems limited to around 200 tons , is that the upper limit?
  #2  
Old 07-21-2016, 01:59 PM
Doubticus Doubticus is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: South-West
Posts: 337
I'm sure it would be possible, but I'm not sure if the economics of such a craft would work in its favor. I've always thought there could be a market for a large ground effect craft https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ground...iet_Union_GEVs , but who knows if it could be made fuel efficient enough or safe enough.
  #3  
Old 07-21-2016, 03:37 PM
engineer_comp_geek engineer_comp_geek is online now
Robot Mod in Beta Testing
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 19,941
You've got the USS Plainview, which was 310 tons, so 200 tons clearly isn't the limit.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Pl...w_%28AGEH-1%29

You might be able to build a larger one, but it's definitely not going to be a practical ship.

Hydrofoils have a deeper draft, which would make a large hydrofoil impractical in many harbors.

Hydrofoils work best in calm water. Rough seas (where a lot of shipping goes) are even rougher in a hydrofoil.

Not only do you have the extra cost of the hydrofoil, but the hull of the ship has to be a lot stronger as well, as the hull has to support the entire weight of the ship on the hydrofoil spars under a variety of loading conditions. And then you need bigger engines and more fuel, which takes away from your cargo carrying capacity. Hydrofoils are good for making light, fast ships. They aren't so good for heavy ships.
  #4  
Old 07-21-2016, 07:31 PM
Hail Ants Hail Ants is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: NY USA
Posts: 7,635
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doubticus View Post
I'm sure it would be possible, but I'm not sure if the economics of such a craft would work in its favor. I've always thought there could be a market for a large ground effect craft https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ground...iet_Union_GEVs , but who knows if it could be made fuel efficient enough or safe enough.
Here's some video of it 'flying'. It was known as The Caspian Sea Monster when it was first spotted by US reconnaissance in the late 60s. Although its supporters had high hopes for it, supposedly when Brezhnev was finally shown film of it he was wholly unimpressed and ordered it cancelled.
  #5  
Old 07-21-2016, 09:34 PM
scr4 scr4 is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Alabama
Posts: 13,960
Boeing proposed the Pelican ground effect transport vehicle in the 90s. It was designed to take off from a normal runway and capable of flying normally up to 20,000 ft altitude, but optimized for flying at very low altitude in ground effect. It never got built.

Last edited by scr4; 07-21-2016 at 09:35 PM.
  #6  
Old 07-22-2016, 10:54 AM
swampspruce swampspruce is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Cold Lake, Alberta
Posts: 3,716
Looking through the links, I kind of like the appearance of the Bartini Beriev VVA-14 without the wings. I looks like some kind of futuristic Marine landing craft....
I didn't realize that the ekranoplans got that large! 500 tons is a lot of mass to be hauling through the sky 20 ft off the ground.

ecg, the link here proposes that they would be able to operate at Sea State 7 and that's not exactly calm water and 1100 ton craft to boot! I understand they work better under calm water, but that doesn't mean they can't work out in the open ocean.

I see your point about more robust construction, but wouldn't that be mitigated by using composites, and ti alloys to lighten the load? Assume you have several billion dollars to allocate to r&d; what would be the maximum practical size that a hydrofoil boat could be made? There are lots of deep draft ships that never go to port like the big cruise liners, so I don't really see that as an issue in my mind.
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:26 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Send questions for Cecil Adams to: cecil@chicagoreader.com

Send comments about this website to: webmaster@straightdope.com

Terms of Use / Privacy Policy

Advertise on the Straight Dope!
(Your direct line to thousands of the smartest, hippest people on the planet, plus a few total dipsticks.)

Publishers - interested in subscribing to the Straight Dope?
Write to: sdsubscriptions@chicagoreader.com.

Copyright 2017 Sun-Times Media, LLC.

 
Copyright © 2017