The Straight Dope

Go Back   Straight Dope Message Board > Main > Elections

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old 10-05-2010, 03:08 PM
Hilarity N. Suze Hilarity N. Suze is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
BADvertising

Okay, semiannual semiliterate rant about negative ads.

Has somebody done some kind of study? Do these things actually work? Because over and over we get this scenario:

"Ken Buck has done this horrible thing. And Ken Buck has done that horrible thing. And Ken Buck has voted for this completely irresponsible bill. Ken Buck. Ken Buck. Ken Buck."

Presumably, this ad was posted by an opponent of Ken Buck, but they have cleverly disguised it as The Party for Righteousness and Fulfillment, or something like that.

Now...I have worked in advertising, and I have worked for a political consultant, and in both cases the clear message was: Get the product name out there. Say the product name. Say the product name at least three times, possibly more. In political advertising the product name is the candidate's name. NOT THE OPPONENT'S NAME.

Whoever is Ken Buck's opponent, I don't know. I think Ken Buck is a Republican, so I'm guessing his opponent is a Democrat, and maybe there's a Libertarian or Green party person in there somewhere, too. But whatever...I don't know THE NAME.

They are doing this completely wrong, therefore I think they are stupid. They sure don't make Ken Buck sound very good, but frankly--they sound worse. Whoever the fuck they are. (No wonder they don't want to leave a name.)

And also, Colorado had a state Do Not Call list before there was a national one, and some very large majority of Colorado phone-owners signed up for it. A large...majority. That is, most of us. Do not want. Unsolicited phone calls.

So, the politicians are exempt. Most of us don't want them to be, but they are.

You would think a good strategy here would be, hey, they don't want unsolicited phone calls, so don't call them. Especially don't call using an automated message.

Hmm, this strategy also seems to have escaped them.

I am on the Do Not Call list. When I get an automated call, the person on whose behalf that call is made automatically goes on my Do Not Vote For list.

This seems so obvious; don't annoy the people you want to vote for you; at least pretend you understand their preferences and concerns! I guess it isn't that obvious.

Last edited by Hilarity N. Suze; 10-05-2010 at 03:10 PM. Reason: Distracted by the Usual Dancing Boys
Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Send questions for Cecil Adams to: cecil@chicagoreader.com

Send comments about this website to: webmaster@straightdope.com

Terms of Use / Privacy Policy

Advertise on the Straight Dope!
(Your direct line to thousands of the smartest, hippest people on the planet, plus a few total dipsticks.)

Publishers - interested in subscribing to the Straight Dope?
Write to: sdsubscriptions@chicagoreader.com.

Copyright © 2013 Sun-Times Media, LLC.