The Straight Dope

Go Back   Straight Dope Message Board > Main > General Questions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-28-2012, 04:25 PM
cynyc cynyc is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Manhattan not by choice!
Posts: 421
Class Action Suit Question ny

If I start a class action suit with a couple of other people named in the suit (assuming one person can't do it) would I wind up with the same 30 cents as everybody else affected?
__________________
"There are over eight million stories in this town,
and I've told them all." ~~ I said that
Reply With Quote
Advertisements  
  #2  
Old 04-28-2012, 04:37 PM
Kimmy_Gibbler Kimmy_Gibbler is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by cynyc View Post
If I start a class action suit with a couple of other people named in the suit (assuming one person can't do it) would I wind up with the same 30 cents as everybody else affected?
An action with three or four plaintiffs isn't going to meet the numerosity requirement for class certification. You have to allege the existence of class sufficiently large that joinder of the plaintiffs into one regular civil action is impracticable.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-28-2012, 05:35 PM
lawbuff lawbuff is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Quote:
Originally Posted by cynyc View Post
If I start a class action suit with a couple of other people named in the suit (assuming one person can't do it) would I wind up with the same 30 cents as everybody else affected?
You first have to comply with the Rules to get it Certified Class Action. Assuming it is a federal complaint, Rule 23 must be Plead. The Court can still deny a certification.

I suppose you are asking do you get more because you initiated the complaint, and the answer is no. I believe I am correct in that. Damages are spread out by # of defendants.

http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/rule_23
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-28-2012, 06:00 PM
BottledBlondJeanie BottledBlondJeanie is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
I am not your lawyer and not licensed in NY. This is not legal advice.

Generally, as mentioned, you have to assume the putative class is certified. To be a representative plaintiff you must not have any major conflicts with the class including a guaranteed right to a greater percentage of the award.

But, as a representative plaintiff, you may be entitled to an incentive award. Here's a study showing that about 28% of class actions awarded them: http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/facpub/355/ Keep in mind incentive awards are not like costs/expenses incurred.

Incentive awards are somewhat discretionary depending on your theory of recovery and must be approved by the class. In certain class actions there's also some degree of notoriety, but that's usually for cases like securities litigation, not $.30 matters.

Last edited by BottledBlondJeanie; 04-28-2012 at 06:02 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-28-2012, 06:10 PM
cynyc cynyc is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Manhattan not by choice!
Posts: 421
Awwww maaannnnnnnnnnnn. Almost sorry I asked.

Here's the situation:

NYC employees active and retired get a certain health insurance. Even Bellvue Hospital, a NYC public hospital renowned for turning away no one won't take it (or their own employees insurance I reckon.)

An NYU related facility that provides a service that my son needs takes "no commercial insurance."

However, they'll take "straight Medicaid."

(Gritting teeth now.)
__________________
"There are over eight million stories in this town,
and I've told them all." ~~ I said that
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-28-2012, 06:27 PM
Kimmy_Gibbler Kimmy_Gibbler is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by cynyc View Post
Awwww maaannnnnnnnnnnn. Almost sorry I asked.

Here's the situation:

NYC employees active and retired get a certain health insurance. Even Bellvue Hospital, a NYC public hospital renowned for turning away no one won't take it (or their own employees insurance I reckon.)

An NYU related facility that provides a service that my son needs takes "no commercial insurance."

However, they'll take "straight Medicaid."

(Gritting teeth now.)
Ah, the infamous tort of "Ain't that just shitty" ....... Alas, it rarely survives a motion to dismiss.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-28-2012, 06:27 PM
BottledBlondJeanie BottledBlondJeanie is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Why sorry you asked? Now that you've delved into specifics and an actual situation, board lawyers will almost certainly stop responding.

But, your original question has been answered. It depends. Isn't the law fun?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-28-2012, 09:34 PM
cynyc cynyc is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Manhattan not by choice!
Posts: 421
My Bad

That was rude of me. Please accept my apology. I forgot to add the part that I could hardly understand what anyone was saying--at least on my first read.

How long do people have to put up with "it sucks, ain't it awful?..." Or how do they stop the suckiness, except to move out of the country.



Quote:
Originally Posted by BottledBlondJeanie View Post
Why sorry you asked? Now that you've delved into specifics and an actual situation, board lawyers will almost certainly stop responding.

But, your original question has been answered. It depends. Isn't the law fun?

Last edited by cynyc; 04-28-2012 at 09:35 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-28-2012, 10:39 PM
BottledBlondJeanie BottledBlondJeanie is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
That's cool.

I have no idea if there's a legal theory that supports such a claim, but the key is to find a law firm that has enough pull to swing such an undertaking and has significant interest in healthcare/insurance. It needs to be ultimately lucrative to the attorneys. Class actions are expensive!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Send questions for Cecil Adams to: cecil@chicagoreader.com

Send comments about this website to: webmaster@straightdope.com

Terms of Use / Privacy Policy

Advertise on the Straight Dope!
(Your direct line to thousands of the smartest, hippest people on the planet, plus a few total dipsticks.)

Publishers - interested in subscribing to the Straight Dope?
Write to: sdsubscriptions@chicagoreader.com.

Copyright © 2013 Sun-Times Media, LLC.