|
|
|
#51
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
What else is the Temple as the Lord's house? Even more so as there was only 1 Temple. There being only one church also means it was at the same time THE church. |
| Advertisements | |
|
|
|
|
#52
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
And to use the term "Church" with a capital letter, which always refers to the Christian religious establishment, often as distinct from other establishments, when referring specifically to the Jewish religious hierarchy is especially jarring. (Note that using "church" as a synecdoche for all religious hierarchies and institutions, as in "separation of church and state" is different than using calling a specific non-Christian institution a church (or the Church). As for your second question, the answer is yes. It wouldn't be used that way of modern Judaism, and you wouldn't use Temple to refer to the mass of Jewish people (so you wouldn't say "members of the Temple" to mean regular Jews) but as a synecdoche for the Temple hierarchy associated with the Sadducees, yes you would. |
|
#53
|
|||
|
|||
|
Where the word comes from has little to do with how it's used today. The word "doctor" comes from the Latin meaning "teacher" but you wouldn't introduce yourself as "Doctor Latro" because you work in an elementary school.
|
|
#54
|
|||
|
|||
|
Any documentation for Mary doin a raspberry on baby Jesus' belly and asking, "whose the Messiah?"
|
|
#55
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Quote:
You may be right in that normal parlance we now have distinct meanings for temple, synagogue, mosque and what have you. But for the sake of the discussion they mean the same. Especially since in those times there were no churches, mosques or synangogues, just temples (and for the Jews just one single temple). Which functioned the same as our 'modern' churches, mosques and synagogues. Last edited by Latro; 05-03-2012 at 03:20 PM. |
|
#56
|
|||
|
|||
|
I HAVE to try that.
|
|
#57
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#58
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#59
|
|||
|
|||
|
Let me elaborate, since I don't think you're actually being anti-Semitic. It's not that different from insisting on saying "England" to refer to the United Kingdom after being told that it's wrong. That's not exactly anti-British, but it is showing a stubbornness and insensitivity about something that has clear political/personal/ethnic significance and about which you are demonstrably wrong. The fact that our societies have a real history of anti-Semitism and that the topic is one that has often been used to support anti-Semitism makes it all the more important to get the terms right. There are people who teach that the Jews (and especially the Jews associated with the Temple in the time of Jesus) are or were literally demons or followers of Satan who usurped the role of the true non-Jewish people of God. Such people often use terminological tricks and innovations to make their "case" (such as it is). I certainly don't think you're one of those people, Latro, but surely you can see why this si significant.
|
|
#60
|
|||
|
|||
|
Talk about borderline...
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|