The Straight Dope

Go Back   Straight Dope Message Board > Main > Comments on Cecil's Columns/Staff Reports

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-06-2012, 09:02 PM
cynyc cynyc is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Manhattan not by choice!
Posts: 421
Mind Your P's and Q's

I wouldn't ask Cecil. I'd ask Pat:

http://www.grammarphobia.com/
Reply With Quote
Advertisements  
  #2  
Old 06-06-2012, 11:09 PM
svd678 svd678 is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: May 2011
I found no reference to Ps & Qs in that link. (Did I do something wrong?)
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-06-2012, 11:20 PM
Giles Giles is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Newcastle NSW
Posts: 11,583
The grammarphobia article: Mind your p’s and q’s

Uncle Cecil's article: What's the origin of the expression "mind your P's and Q's"?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-07-2012, 06:28 AM
C K Dexter Haven C K Dexter Haven is offline
Right Hand of the Master
Administrator
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Chicago north suburb
Posts: 14,704
Cecil doesn't do much etymology nowadays, since the advent of the internet and so many websited dedicated to word/phrase origins. However, in his column (from 1989) he cites an OED reference from 1612 (spelled "Pee and Kew.") Ms O'Conner on the Grammarphobia blog cites 1779, also from the OED.

I don't have an OED to check them, but 'praps some kind soul will do so here. Frankly, I find Cecil's article more complete and more informative, but I guess it's a matter of taste.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-07-2012, 09:57 AM
Exapno Mapcase Exapno Mapcase is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: NY but not NYC
Posts: 21,109
Etymonline.com
Quote:
To mind one's Ps and Qs (1779), possibly is from confusion of these letters among children learning to write. Another theory traces it to old-time tavern-keepers tracking their patrons' bar tabs in pints and quarts. But cf. also to be P and Q (1610s), "to be excellent," a slang phrase said to derive from prime quality.
In short, no definitive answer. It's likely that several expressions were influenced by one another or melded together in common speech.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-07-2012, 02:34 PM
John W. Kennedy John W. Kennedy is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Chatham, NJ, USA
Posts: 4,524
Cecil’s reference is OK, but, although Hannah Cowley is real, and Who’s the Dupe is a real play that she produced in 1779, it is not cited in the OED3 s.v. p’s and q’s
__________________
John W. Kennedy
"The blind rulers of Logres
Nourished the land on a fallacy of rational virtue."
-- Charles Williams. Taliessin through Logres: Prelude
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-07-2012, 07:44 PM
agnesnitt agnesnitt is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
On the Q.T,

I'm a little surprised by the answer that q.t. is an abbreviation for quiet.

I'd like to point out that there is at least one famous latin expression in which 'he who is silent' forms a part.

qui tacet consentire--he who is silent is take to agree.

Therefore, there may be an equivalent expression like "qui tacet"-- that means "he/it who/which is silent."

While the declension may be incorrect (It may be qui tacere or something) I think it's a more likely answer for Q.T. than an abbreviation for quiet.

Q.T. is probably an old legal, parliamentary, or literary expression (like q.v.) that has passed from use.

I for one think 'quiet' would be abbreviated as qt. Instead whenever I've seen the reference it's always Q.T., which usually indicates an abbreviation of a Latin expression.

I would check with a Classics professor.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-07-2012, 08:07 PM
Exapno Mapcase Exapno Mapcase is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: NY but not NYC
Posts: 21,109
Etymonline again:
Quote:
q.t.
slang for "quiet," in on the q.t., attested from 1874. Phrase on the quiet appears from 1847.
All the word origin sites say the same thing, with more detail. None suggests any connection to the Latin phrase.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-07-2012, 09:53 PM
cynyc cynyc is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Manhattan not by choice!
Posts: 421
This was a Just Saying thing. I emailed Pat twice and she answered both times. I've never really used her site.

We had a nice conversation on the word--the spoken word that I detest whenever I hear it:

Empathetic. (Empathy.) Drives me crazy. What the hell is wrong with empathic? Who turned it into a version of emphasize or pathetic.

This is in my hit parade of pet peeves.
__________________
"There are over eight million stories in this town,
and I've told them all." ~~ I said that
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-08-2012, 02:07 PM
John W. Kennedy John W. Kennedy is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Chatham, NJ, USA
Posts: 4,524
Quote:
Originally Posted by agnesnitt View Post
I'm a little surprised by the answer that q.t. is an abbreviation for quiet.

I'd like to point out that there is at least one famous latin expression in which 'he who is silent' forms a part.

qui tacet consentire--he who is silent is take to agree.

Therefore, there may be an equivalent expression like "qui tacet"-- that means "he/it who/which is silent."

While the declension may be incorrect (It may be qui tacere or something) I think it's a more likely answer for Q.T. than an abbreviation for quiet.

Q.T. is probably an old legal, parliamentary, or literary expression (like q.v.) that has passed from use.

I for one think 'quiet' would be abbreviated as qt. Instead whenever I've seen the reference it's always Q.T., which usually indicates an abbreviation of a Latin expression.

I would check with a Classics professor.
But it makes no sense. “We want to do this on the he who is silent.” Bleah! Indeed, all the early citations in the OED are “strict” or “strictly q.t.”, which makes even less sense. And it’s not as though the word itself is obscure—it’s given us the English word “tacit”, and any performer knows, as well, that “tacet” is the musical equivalent of “This space intentionally left blank.” The OED says it’s “q[uie]t” (which used to be a common style of abbreviation, as in “M[iste]r” or “M[ain]e”), and I’d need some hard proof before I’d disagree.
__________________
John W. Kennedy
"The blind rulers of Logres
Nourished the land on a fallacy of rational virtue."
-- Charles Williams. Taliessin through Logres: Prelude
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 06-11-2012, 08:27 PM
Powers Powers is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Rochester, NY, USA
Posts: 767
Quote:
Originally Posted by cynyc View Post
Empathetic. (Empathy.) Drives me crazy. What the hell is wrong with empathic? Who turned it into a version of emphasize or pathetic.

This is in my hit parade of pet peeves.
Yet you don't complain that it's 'sympathetic' instead of 'sympathic'?

Besides, using "empathetic" frees up "empathic" for the sci-fi use. =)


Powers &8^]
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 06-12-2012, 06:41 AM
C K Dexter Haven C K Dexter Haven is offline
Right Hand of the Master
Administrator
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Chicago north suburb
Posts: 14,704
The emphasis is on the empathy?
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 06-14-2012, 01:04 PM
Sloth4z Sloth4z is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
P's and Q's

For some reason I've always thought that "mind your P's and Q's," meant be sure to say please and thank you. It's a play on the similar sounding between Q and "thank you". I don't know how I got this idea, but I find it surprising how different it is from Cecil's explanations.

http://www.straightdope.com/columns/...your-ps-and-qs
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 06-14-2012, 03:53 PM
C K Dexter Haven C K Dexter Haven is offline
Right Hand of the Master
Administrator
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Chicago north suburb
Posts: 14,704
Welcome to the Straight Dope Message Boards, Sloth4z, glad to have you with us. And thanks for providing a link to the column!

Since there was already a thread on this topic, I'm merging your new thread into that one. Keeps all discussion on P's and Q's in the same place.

On your comment: Agreed, there's a pun on Q's but there's also that P's sounds like a child's rendition of "Please" (omitting the difficult L sound.) Attractive theory, but not mentioned by most etymologists.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 06-14-2012, 06:31 PM
thirdname thirdname is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
In logic, the letters p and q are typically used in the same way that x and y are used in algebra. Perhaps that has something to do with it?
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 06-14-2012, 10:28 PM
John W. Kennedy John W. Kennedy is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Chatham, NJ, USA
Posts: 4,524
No, the expression is much older than modern formalizations of logic. If that had been the case, the system (in reference to the old rules of Barbara, Celarent, etc.) might have turned out something like *“Mind your e’s and i’s.”
__________________
John W. Kennedy
"The blind rulers of Logres
Nourished the land on a fallacy of rational virtue."
-- Charles Williams. Taliessin through Logres: Prelude
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 08-29-2012, 03:07 PM
cynyc cynyc is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Manhattan not by choice!
Posts: 421
I just remembered something. I read somewhere that it had to do with the olden way of setting type--one letter at a time. And the shop owner would remind the typesetters not to mix them up, the p's and the q's) when putting them away.

FWIW
__________________
"There are over eight million stories in this town,
and I've told them all." ~~ I said that
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 08-29-2012, 03:27 PM
Powers Powers is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Rochester, NY, USA
Posts: 767
Quote:
Originally Posted by cynyc View Post
I just remembered something. I read somewhere that it had to do with the olden way of setting type--one letter at a time. And the shop owner would remind the typesetters not to mix them up, the p's and the q's) when putting them away.

FWIW
Did you perhaps read it in Cecil's column?

http://www.straightdope.com/columns/...your-ps-and-qs

Which is, you know, the subject under discussion here?


Powers &8^]
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 08-29-2012, 03:52 PM
cynyc cynyc is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Manhattan not by choice!
Posts: 421
Cecil who? Or nope. :-)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Powers View Post
Did you perhaps read it in Cecil's column?

http://www.straightdope.com/columns/...your-ps-and-qs

Which is, you know, the subject under discussion here?


Powers &8^]
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 08-30-2012, 12:32 PM
John W. Kennedy John W. Kennedy is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Chatham, NJ, USA
Posts: 4,524
I, for one, certainly encountered the typesetting argument long before Cecil wrote his first column. (And, deep in my past, I’ve actually used a composing stick and a California box.)
__________________
John W. Kennedy
"The blind rulers of Logres
Nourished the land on a fallacy of rational virtue."
-- Charles Williams. Taliessin through Logres: Prelude
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 08-30-2012, 01:15 PM
Irishman Irishman is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Quote:
Originally Posted by cynyc View Post
Empathetic. (Empathy.) Drives me crazy. What the hell is wrong with empathic? Who turned it into a version of emphasize or pathetic.
As noted, this is derived from an incorrect parallel with "sympathetic".

Quote:
Originally Posted by Powers View Post
Yet you don't complain that it's 'sympathetic' instead of 'sympathic'?
Because "sympathetic" comes from the Greek sumpathetikos, so is correct. [crap, formatting didn't keep]

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/sympathetic

Last edited by Irishman; 08-30-2012 at 01:16 PM. Reason: formatting on Greek didn't work
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 08-31-2012, 10:55 AM
Powers Powers is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Rochester, NY, USA
Posts: 767
Quote:
Originally Posted by Irishman View Post
Because "sympathetic" comes from the Greek sumpathetikos, so is correct. [crap, formatting didn't keep]

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/sympathetic
I didn't say "sympathetic" was incorrect. Are you saying that the "pathy" in sympathy has a different derivation than the "pathy" in empathy? Don't they both come from "pathos", meaning 'feeling'?


Powers &8^]

Last edited by Powers; 08-31-2012 at 10:55 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 08-31-2012, 01:15 PM
Irishman Irishman is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
It would seem that way to me. But I'm just looking in the "derivations" stuff in online dictionaries. Someone with better info could provide a better answer as to why sympathy has sympatheticos and thus sympathetic, but empathy does not have empatheticos and thus empathetic.

Perhaps sympathy is a much older word than empathy?
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 08-31-2012, 01:17 PM
Irishman Irishman is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
I thought it stood for "mind your Penises and Qunts".
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 08-31-2012, 04:35 PM
Exapno Mapcase Exapno Mapcase is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: NY but not NYC
Posts: 21,109
Quote:
Originally Posted by Irishman View Post
It would seem that way to me. But I'm just looking in the "derivations" stuff in online dictionaries. Someone with better info could provide a better answer as to why sympathy has sympatheticos and thus sympathetic, but empathy does not have empatheticos and thus empathetic.

Perhaps sympathy is a much older word than empathy?
Much older and with a totally different history. From Etymonline.com

Quote:
empathy (n.)
1903, from Ger. Einfühlung (from ein "in" + Fühlung "feeling"), coined 1858 by German philosopher Rudolf Lotze (1817-1881) as a translation of Gk. empatheia "passion, state of emotion," from en "in" (see en- (2)) + pathos "feeling" (see pathos). A term from a theory of art appreciation that maintains appreciation depends on the viewer's ability to project his personality into the viewed object.

empathic
1909, from empathy + -ic. Related: Empathically.

empathetic
1932, in psychology, from empathy on model of sympathetic and to distinguish it from empathic. Related: Empathetically.
Quote:
sympathy
1570s, "affinity between certain things," from M.Fr. sympathie, from L.L. sympathia "community of feeling, sympathy," from Gk. sympatheia, from sympathes "having a fellow feeling, affected by like feelings," from syn- "together" + pathos "feeling" (see pathos). In English, almost a magical notion at first; e.g. in reference to medicines that heal wounds when applied to a cloth stained with blood from the wound. Meaning "conformity of feelings" is from 1590s; sense of "fellow feeling" is first attested 1660s. An O.E. loan-translation of sympathy was efensargung.

sympathetic
1640s, "pertaining to sympathy," from Mod.L. sympatheticus, from Gk. sympathetikos, from sympathein, from sympathes "having a fellow feeling, affected by like feelings" (see sympathy). Meaning "having fellow feeling" is recorded from 1718. In anatomical sense, the word is attested from 1769, from Mod.L. (nervus) sympathicus, coined by Jacques-Benigne Winslow (1669-1760), Danish anatomist living in Paris. Related: Sympathetically.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 09-06-2012, 06:42 PM
Powers Powers is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Rochester, NY, USA
Posts: 767
Okay, so "empathy" comes from the Greek "empatheia", while "sympathy" comes from the Greek "sympatheia". Both use the root "pathos", meaning "feeling".

In the 17th century, someone decided we needed an adjectival form of "sympathy" and reached back to the Latin and Greek to find 'sympathetikos'/'-cus' and create "sympathetic".

In the 20th century, someone decided we needed an adjectival form of "empathy" and just added the usual "-c" suffix: "empathic". A few years later, someone decided that if the Greeks had needed such a word they would have used "empathetikos" and thus coined "empathetic".

I don't see any grounds here for calling "empathetic" wrong in any way, just because it's 13 years younger than "empathic".


Powers &8^]
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Send questions for Cecil Adams to: cecil@chicagoreader.com

Send comments about this website to: webmaster@straightdope.com

Terms of Use / Privacy Policy

Advertise on the Straight Dope!
(Your direct line to thousands of the smartest, hippest people on the planet, plus a few total dipsticks.)

Publishers - interested in subscribing to the Straight Dope?
Write to: sdsubscriptions@chicagoreader.com.

Copyright © 2013 Sun-Times Media, LLC.