|
|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Does this joke work for you (do you "get it")? | |||
| I get the joke and had the same or similar experience at some point in my life. |
|
9 | 5.26% |
| I get the joke but never had the same or similar experience at some point in my life. |
|
153 | 89.47% |
| I don't get the joke. |
|
6 | 3.51% |
| Sum'n else. |
|
3 | 1.75% |
| Voters: 171. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Does this joke work for you?
Recently I was watching an episode of The Golden Girls and was shocked at how everybody in the room (about six people) understood this somewhat raunchy joke. I'd have thought you'd have to have had the experience yourself at some point in your life in order to understand the punchline.
Here's the joke: Dorothy and a male neighbor have been arguing over something and eventually come to an agreement. The neighbor makes the following conciliatory gesture: Quote:
I'm wondering if I would have gotten it if I had never had that experience. The video is on you tube. If you want to watch the exchange, fast-forward to 18:35. |
| Advertisements | |
|
|
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
The joke is that his robe sometimes comes open and they get a peek at him, right? I guess the joke works, but it isn't even subtle to me and this has NEVER occurred in my life. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
That's not quite what happens... so I might be right in that it's hard to visualize the set-up without having had the experience yourself.
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
How short is his robe? Is something falling out of his shorts? Or maybe there's just a tear in it?
Why don't you just tell us what happens instead of being vague? Put it in a spoiler box if you must. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Too late to edit:
SPOILER:
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
I assumed that was what they were going for, but I can't think of any bathrobe I have that would do that--they're all too long.
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'm not sure I understand why the Original Post even exists. The joke is obvious to anyone who speaks English.
Joe |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
It took me a second, but I finally got it. At first, I though she (being a horny old woman) was asking him to wear shorts instead of trousers so she could get a good peek at his business. Now I realize she meant just the opposite.
Maybe he's an exhibitionist, or maybe he just has this problem: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VvDzE6oDWM8
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
People must be afraid to show their knees in their own houses. |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Not trousers, pajamas.
There! That makes a lot more sense!
|
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Of course there is another implication in the joke:
There is one, small thing... Dick jokes never go out of style. Last edited by Loach; 06-21-2012 at 10:09 AM. |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
And how is that different than 'the robe comes up and they get a peek at him'? Aside from the fact it's a woman who's actually wearing underwear in that picture.
|
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
I haven't had the exact situation happen (e.g. with a bathrobe, etc.), but I had an overweight roommate who wore the most raggedy-ass gitch while wandering through the house, and we all agreed that it would be a wonderful favour if he started wearing something else.
|
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
I assume it has nothing to do with the length of the robe, but rather whether or not it's tied shut properly or not - which can often be an issue. If he's not wearing shorts (boxers) and the front of his robe pops open, they're getting an eyeful.
|
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
but yes, obviously I figured out what the joke is supposed to mean. |
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
It's so obvious I'm not even sure you need to speak English.
|
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
It doesn't work for me in the sense that it's not funny.
|
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Think of Miss Mann in Scary Movie 2, if you've seen that movie.
__________________
Join Date: May 20, 1999 Location: Bangkok, Thailand ♂ Posts: 8,513 Last edited by Patty O'Furniture; 06-21-2012 at 11:35 AM. |
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
It wasn't to me either but I didn't watch the video so maybe there was some context lost. |
|
#21
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Also, I agree that it's not a particularly funny joke. But it's quite possible to get a joke and also not think it's very funny. "To get" a joke does not mean "think it's funny", it means "to understand what is intended to be funny". |
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
|
It's irrelevant whether his robe is too short or it comes untied or a breeze blows it up like Marilyn Monroe's dress- the point is, one way or another they get an eyeful of his franks & beans, and it's undesirable. So they want him to wear underwear.
So in that sense, yes, it works, I get it. |
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
|
This is a really weird thread.
|
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
|
Sitcom jokes have generally been pretty lame ever since the late '70s.
|
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
|
I dunno, Cheers only rarely disappointed.
|
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
|
I don't understand this entire thread. What is it that the OP thinks people aren't getting? It's actually too obvious to be called a "joke."
|
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Cheers!", God bless it, was a rare exception to the rule, as was "Frasier."
I'm sure there have been others, but they are few and far between. |
|
#28
|
|||
|
|||
|
Same here. Talk about overcomplicating things.
|
|
#29
|
|||
|
|||
|
See, I actually think you've got it wrong. Thick terry robes that cross over and are closed with a tied terrycloth belt were the norm back then.
It doesn't matter how long the robe is, if you bend over forward your knees go out thus pushing the front of the robe open in a long triangle from bottom to belt. It's not the back view that's the problem, it's knees to waist frontal. Squatting frontal, no less. Ewwww! The older the bender, the more exagerated the effect, because older folks need to widen their stance and bend their knees outward. Plus, the view gets less appealing as time marches on. Last edited by TruCelt; 06-21-2012 at 02:38 PM. |
|
#30
|
|||
|
|||
|
Old man crotch joke: Good times.
|
|
#31
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
The whole thing took awhile for me because all the robes I have are long/big enough I don't have a problem with them opening when I bend over. |
|
#32
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
It's not particularly funny and certainly isn't complicated, so I'm also confused by why the OP thinks some kind of personal experience might be needed to understand it. |
|
#33
|
|||
|
|||
|
I think the old guy was wearing a shortish robe, and bent over to get his newspaper and since his back was to the ladies, they got a look at his saggy old man balls.
|
|
#34
|
|||
|
|||
|
Maybe but this was the 80's and the era of the terrycloth robe. Even a full length one could flash people multiple ways. Robes don't cover well by themselves because they are loose, open in the front, and cinch around the waist so any walking or bending will expose you. You need underwear (shorts) for full coverage. It seems obvious and that is all I made of it.
Last edited by Shagnasty; 06-21-2012 at 10:00 PM. |
|
#35
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ditto. She's saying "Do us all a favor and keep your boy parts covered. We can see everything when you bend over and it's not pretty."
|
|
#36
|
|||
|
|||
|
I didn't understand this joke until I did some experimenting with paper towel tubes in the back yard.
|
|
#37
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#38
|
|||
|
|||
|
This is not meme material. Really, it's right up there with Goatse: just quit!
|
|
#39
|
|||
|
|||
|
I guess bending over and showing too much makes sense. I was thinking maybe the guy sports an early morning hard-on and shorts would keep it in, or something. I wouldn't expect everyone to immediately get that though.
|
|
#40
|
|||
|
|||
|
Why would personal experience be required to find this funny? And if this counts as a RAUNCHY joke, then I dont know how you handle most humor these days, let alone some of the other jokes that were on golden girls.
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|