The Straight Dope

Go Back   Straight Dope Message Board > Main > General Questions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51  
Old 06-27-2012, 06:12 AM
Shalmanese Shalmanese is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 5,600
Can you have a pool without a deep end and still have starting blocks? I remember when using starting blocks that you would go a decent way into the water if you wanted to.
Reply With Quote
Advertisements  
  #52  
Old 06-27-2012, 06:33 AM
Si Amigo Si Amigo is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: North of 8 Mile
Posts: 2,262
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shalmanese View Post
Can you have a pool without a deep end and still have starting blocks? I remember when using starting blocks that you would go a decent way into the water if you wanted to.
Olympic pool standards are 2 meter depth minimum and often go deeper. I imagine that most pools used for competition use the Olympic standard or close to it. Six and half minimum qualifies as deep end for me; in fact the whole thing is deep.
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 06-27-2012, 07:28 AM
fiddlesticks fiddlesticks is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Alamo City
Posts: 3,894
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shalmanese View Post
Can you have a pool without a deep end and still have starting blocks? I remember when using starting blocks that you would go a decent way into the water if you wanted to.
The new YMCA pool in my hometown (2nd one in the building) that was built in the 1980s had starting blocks in the shallow end. Thinking the shallow end was 4 feet, because it wasn't "up to the waist" shallow, but you could still stand easily as a kid. The deep end had a movable walkway to adjust the length of the lap section of the pool and separated it from the diving well. I used the blocks during swimming lessons but during open swim lifeguards would throw you out if you got up on them. I remember I used to scrap my chest half the time, and the instructors put the fear in God to us about being careful to protect our heads and necks.
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old 06-27-2012, 07:54 AM
BigT BigT is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
So far, I don't believe my local pool has been renovated to remove the deep end, though I haven't been there in a while, anyways. It's just not something they are likely to spend money on. Few people around here are in the "save money by spending money" wave of thought.
Reply With Quote
  #55  
Old 06-27-2012, 10:10 AM
billfish678 billfish678 is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Quote:
Originally Posted by fiddlesticks View Post
. I remember I used to scrap my chest half the time, and the instructors put the fear in God to us about being careful to protect our heads and necks.
Wouldn't it be ironic that in trying to make pools safer by having no deep end we significantly increase the number of serious head and neck injuries? Many people like to dive in water. Most people have enough sense to do it in the deep end. But if there isn't one it will be in the shallower water and thats not as safe.

Also, this no deep end business might make more people afraid of the water. Yeah you can learn to swim in water you can stand up in. But you are less likely to do so or feel the need to do. And even if you do learn to swim, water over your head is still gonna be a bit scary because you've never/rarely actual staked you life on your ability to swim.

And durn it I like deep ends. And not for the diving board. I just liked swimming around down there. I hate to see them go

Last edited by billfish678; 06-27-2012 at 10:11 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #56  
Old 06-27-2012, 11:11 AM
Diceman Diceman is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
My in-laws have a pool with a deep end. The pool isn't deep enough to dive in, so the deep end is mostly a nuisance that makes it impossible to stand up in half the pool.
Reply With Quote
  #57  
Old 06-27-2012, 11:51 AM
Anne Neville Anne Neville is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 11,578
Quote:
Originally Posted by billfish678 View Post
Also, this no deep end business might make more people afraid of the water.
That might not be an entirely bad thing. According to the CDC, about 3500 Americans drown every year. We should be at least as afraid of drowning as we are of terrorism.
Reply With Quote
  #58  
Old 07-17-2012, 07:07 PM
The Man In Black The Man In Black is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Quote:
Originally Posted by Anne Neville View Post
That might not be an entirely bad thing. According to the CDC, about 3500 Americans drown every year. We should be at least as afraid of drowning as we are of terrorism.
I would think being able to swim (or swim better) would take care of at least some of those deaths.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:24 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Send questions for Cecil Adams to: cecil@chicagoreader.com

Send comments about this website to: webmaster@straightdope.com

Terms of Use / Privacy Policy

Advertise on the Straight Dope!
(Your direct line to thousands of the smartest, hippest people on the planet, plus a few total dipsticks.)

Publishers - interested in subscribing to the Straight Dope?
Write to: sdsubscriptions@chicagoreader.com.

Copyright © 2013 Sun-Times Media, LLC.