SDMB Bigoted Asshole Omnibus Thread

[brazil84]

Originally Posted by Gyrate

Against you.

Lol, whatever.

As I asked you in what is now post #2356, do you agree that some of the observed differences between Race 1 and Race 2 are the result of genetics?

Also, are you seriously disputing that differences in eye color between two large groups of people is caused substantially by genes?

And are you saying that you don't know whether Ashkenazim and ethnic Germans can be grouped by their genes?

And what exactly would I look for to determine whether a particular group can be grouped by its genes? Would I look for a gene (actually an allele) which is found in all members of that group but in no other group? Or something else?

[Gyrate]

I'm sorry - are you under the impression that I care to continue to engage in your irrelevant semantic tangents? I realized pages ago that you weren't worth seriously engaging with since you never seem to understand any answer that isn't "yes" or "no". The fact that I indulge in the occasional potshot is purely for my own amusement rather than to persuade you of anything.

Or if you like: goodbye, idiot.

[brazil84]

Originally Posted by Gyrate

I'm sorry - are you under the impression that I care to continue to engage in your irrelevant semantic tangents? I realized pages ago that you weren't worth seriously engaging with since you never seem to understand any answer that isn't "yes" or "no".

i.e. you prefer to ignore or evade questions so that you can hide your special pleading behind a cloak of ambiguity.

Goodbye.

[Vinyl Turnip]

b84 Mad Libs

Are you disputing that __________ is ___________? Is it your position that _________ and __________ are not _____________? Are you saying you've changed your position that ____________ is never ____________? Show me where I said ______________ or apologize. Do you agree that _________ can be __________? In other words, you __________ to _________. Lol. Goodbye, liar.

[Smeghead]

Originally Posted by Vinyl Turnip

b84 Mad Libs

Are you disputing that __________ is ___________? Is it your position that _________ and __________ are not _____________? Are you saying you've changed your position that ____________ is never ____________? Show me where I said ______________ or apologize. Do you agree that _________ can be __________? In other words, you __________ to _________. Lol. Goodbye, liar.

Lol, whatever.

[Gyrate]

Let it be noted that, according to brazil84, ignoring or evading questions and refusing to engage with another poster indicates that that poster has no argument to make.

Good to know.

[Truman Burbank]

Originally Posted by Gyrate

Let it be noted that, according to brazil84, ignoring or evading questions and refusing to engage with another poster indicates that that poster has no argument to make.

Good to know.

And thank you for watching another episode of "Hoist On His Own Petard", 5 millionth edition.

[Hentor the Barbarian]

Originally Posted by brazil84

i.e. you prefer to ignore or evade questions so that you can hide your special pleading behind a cloak of ambiguity.

Goodbye.

Oh yeah, I forgot to make my formal goodbyes.

You are a weasel and a liar. Goodbye.

[Evil Economist]

The only real question left is whether Brazil84 should also be banned. He certainly doesn't contribute in any way to the board. However, unlike NDD, he's more likely mentally ill than evil.

If he was gone tomorrow, the level of discourse here would certainly improve, and the level of stupidity would decrease. However, that could probably be said for other posters as well.

So, should Brazil84 be banned?

[elucidator]

Well, sure, if he wasn't so darned cute!

[kidchameleon]

Originally Posted by Evil Economist

The only real question left is whether Brazil84 should also be banned. He certainly doesn't contribute in any way to the board. However, unlike NDD, he's more likely mentally ill than evil.

If he was gone tomorrow, the level of discourse here would certainly improve, and the level of stupidity would decrease. However, that could probably be said for other posters as well.

So, should Brazil84 be banned?

I think if we implemented a rule where willful ignorance of data was a warnable offense, I think he would quickly get himself banned.

[Boyo Jim]

Do we get to vote now? I have a list!

[Truman Burbank]

His post is his list...

[Left Hand of Dorkness]

This article in Jezebel resonates with me.

[Vinyl Turnip]

Originally Posted by Left Hand of Dorkness

This article in Jezebel resonates with me.

Eerily appropriate. On the other hand, you read Jezebel? Faaaaaaag!

[Left Hand of Dorkness]

Originally Posted by Vinyl Turnip

Eerily appropriate. On the other hand, you read Jezebel? Faaaaaaag!

If there had been someone else in the room when I put up that link, I would have won ten bucks off your post.

[elucidator]

Shit, that ain't nothin', Shodan reads Cosmopolitan.

[Doughbag]

His claim.....

Originally Posted by gamerunknown

Number of sexual partners presumably grows more heritable through a person's life. Does that mean sexual voracity is genetic?

Your answer.....

Originally Posted by brazil84

I don't know if this is true or not. It would be very difficult to measure.

You are a complete retard.

How the fuck can any person has more sexual partners at the age 9 years, compared to then when they are 20 years old or 40 years?

Which means, that at 20 years you have had 15 partners, but at 30 years its only 5 partners, because you are getting older, right?

Sure, someone can have sex with 27 women/men when s/he’s 20, but when the husband/wife asks, its only 3 women/men.

Originally Posted by brazil84

It would be very difficult to measure.

Now, where is this difficult to measure?
You start at 0, when you had sex with a person, you add 1.= ONE
If you have sex with another person, add 1 more = TWO
If you're then lucky enough to be able to get laid again, add 1 = THREE

Since this is difficult for you, how the fuck to you expect us to believe, that you know anything about genetics?

Which brings me back to my first point: YOU are a complete idiot of a retard!!

[Bryan Ekers]

"She was my first love - or at least the earliest one I can still remember."

[elucidator]

I'll never forget! A butt to die for, totally kicking upper rack, could suck a golf ball through a garden hose. Had a name, too. Pretty sure. They all do, right?

[Steve MB]

Originally Posted by brazil84

Eppur si muove.

I'm glad that your bowels are in working order, but that's not really relevant to the topic at hand.

Originally Posted by Gyrate

Let it be noted that, according to brazil84, ignoring or evading questions and refusing to engage with another poster indicates that that poster has no argument to make.

So he has yet another trope of his very own.

Originally Posted by elucidator

Shit, that ain't nothin', Shodan reads Cosmopolitan.

For the articles?

[Vinyl Turnip]

Originally Posted by elucidator

I'll never forget! A butt to die for, totally kicking upper rack, could suck a golf ball through a garden hose. Had a name, too. Pretty sure. They all do, right?

"Fantasy." May have been a stripper.

[Vinyl Turnip]

Originally Posted by Steve MB

For the articles?

Well you're not gonna get "10 Ways to Please Your Man" from Sean Hannity, unless your man is one of the Koch brothers.

[brazil84]

Originally Posted by Steve MB

I'm glad that your bowels are in working order,

Thank you.

but that's not really relevant to the topic at hand.

Agreed, but moral fashion and (attempted) silencing of dissent is.

So he has yet another trope of his very own.

Do you care to actually discuss specifics? Or are you interested only in asserting conclusions?

[Evil Economist]

Originally Posted by brazil84

Thank you.



Agreed, but moral fashion and (attempted) silencing of dissent is.



Do you care to actually discuss specifics? Or are you interested only in asserting conclusions?

I'm shocked that there's someone posting to this thread who Brazil84 hasn't "ignored" yet.

[Bryan Ekers]

I'm vaguely surprised brazil hasn't realized that by continuing to post to this thread, he assumes the label of "Bigoted Asshole".

[kayaker]

Originally Posted by Bryan Ekers

I'm vaguely surprised brazil hasn't realized that by continuing to post to this thread, he assumes the label of "Bigoted Asshole".

Label? I think it is more a mantle.

[Gyrate]

Originally Posted by brazil84

Do you care to actually discuss specifics? Or are you interested only in asserting conclusions?

I swear, sometimes the jokes just write themselves.

[Vinyl Turnip]

Originally Posted by Gyrate

I swear, sometimes the jokes just write themselves.

Personally I think he should've delivered that line right as the laughter from this joke was dying down:

Originally Posted by brazil84

Why do you want to have a meta-discussion?

as a kind of one-two punch to really bring the house down. but that's just me. b84 has his own unique comic style.

[Ludovic]

Originally Posted by Vinyl Turnip

Personally I think he should've delivered that line right as the laughter from this joke was dying down:

That's possibly the funniest thing I've read all week.

[cmyk]

Sometimes I run through brazil84's yard naked, cuz he can't see me.

Then I poop on his Confederate flag.

[Doughbag]

Originally Posted by brazil84

Do you care to actually discuss specifics? Or are you interested only in asserting conclusions?

Trying yourself at comedy now?

….since you obviously know jack-shit about genetics!

[Who_me?]

Originally Posted by Doughbag

Trying yourself at comedy now?

….since you obviously know jack-shit about genetics!

I'd make that he obviously doesn't know jack-shit about anything.

[lance strongarm]

Originally Posted by Doughbag

You are a complete retard.
Which brings me back to my first point: YOU are a complete idiot of a retard!!

Please don't use retard as an insult. Especially in a thread about genetics.

[Drunky Smurf]

Originally Posted by lance strongarm

Please don't use retard as an insult. Especially in a thread about genetics.

Please don't be retarded and start demanding what people can and can not post. You fucking tard.

[lance strongarm]

Originally Posted by Drunky Smurf

Please don't be retarded and start demanding what people can and can not post. You fucking tard.

I didn't demand anything. I politely asked.

(I find it ironic that you're bitching about what people can post in a thread that now involves discussion of banning a certain member, but whatever, I'm smart like that).

I'll politely ask you not to be an asshole too. I doubt you'll comply. Let's see.

[kidchameleon]

Originally Posted by Who_me?

I'd make that he obviously doesn't know jack-shit about anything.

He's an expert in faux banning.

[Truman Burbank]

I just popped back in to remind 84 that he's an idiot. Of course, since he can neither see nor hear me, it will be like a hint from the universe, whispering in his ear....

Has he banned enough people to have finally won, yet?

[elucidator]

Its the legend of Shrodinger's Doper. So obnoxious, on every single ignore list on the Boards, having offended every group known, including but not limited to Republicans, Democrats, libertarians, vegetarians, Lithuanians and mimes. Legend has it that he types furiously for hours on end in his airless room, fueled by Ding Dongs and Red Bull. Of course, no one reads them, so they may not exist.

Only the hamsters know for sure that he exists, and they hate him with the fury of a thousand suns, and dream of burning his dog.

[Morgyn]

Originally Posted by elucidator

Only the hamsters know for sure that he exists, and they hate him with the fury of a thousand suns, and dream of burning his dog.

Back in my college years, I knew someone with a hamster. She told me one morning of having a restless night; she was unable to sleep well because all night long the hamster was going *rustle rustle rustle*. When she finally crawled out of bed in the morning, it was to discover that the hamster had managed to escape its Habitrail, had found the unopened bag of hamster kibble, and had spent the entire night gnawing a hole in that bag and then ferrying the contents of the kibble bag back to the Habitrail.

She didn't have to feed that hamster for a month, and it got really, really fat.¹

I have to hand it to you guys for persistence in the face of wanton, craven, obdurate idiocy. I've been reading this thread with fascination because of the arguments and cites Colibri, Brain Glutton, MrDibble, Harmonix, iiandyii, and so many others have provided. Seriously, guys, kudos to all of you. I knew those two were spewing nonsense, but I didn't have the knowledge (or the patience) to refute them. I learned a lot. I thank you for that.



¹Brought to you by the who gives a fuck, it's got as much to do with genetics and science as anything posted by the racists, and it's much more amusing committee.

[elucidator]

For the true dweeb, imparting information is as close to a sexual experience as is likely.

[Gyrate]

Originally Posted by elucidator

Its the legend of Shrodinger's Doper. So obnoxious, on every single ignore list on the Boards, having offended every group known, including but not limited to Republicans, Democrats, libertarians, vegetarians, Lithuanians and mimes.

Remember this guy? He brought the whole board together, people of all political and economic and philosophical persuasions in common concord, united in the deep and profound understanding that that dude was a major asshole.

Brings a tear to my eye to think of it, it does.

[brazil84]

Originally Posted by Morgyn

. I knew those two were spewing nonsense, but I didn't have the knowledge (or the patience) to refute them.

Fascinating that you first made your decision about which side of the argument was wrong and then acquired the knowledge to support that decision (ETA: Or at least think you have knowledge supporting your position.)

Not that you are unique -- unfortunately a lot of people think this way.

[GIGObuster]

I would say fortunately. Ok guys, time to go somewhere, lets leave the nowhere man to run around happily in his shrinking circles.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6wn_BTkoZo0

[Gyrate]

Originally Posted by brazil84

Fascinating that you first made your decision about which side of the argument was wrong and then acquired the knowledge to support that decision (ETA: Or at least think you have knowledge supporting your position.)

Not that you are unique -- unfortunately a lot of people think this way.

Okay, he's just doing it on purpose now.

[Smeghead]

Originally Posted by Gyrate

Okay, he's just doing it on purpose now.

Now??!

[Drunky Smurf]

Originally Posted by lance strongarm

I didn't demand anything. I politely asked.

(I find it ironic that you're bitching about what people can post in a thread that now involves discussion of banning a certain member, but whatever, I'm smart like that).

I'll politely ask you not to be an asshole too. I doubt you'll comply. Let's see.

I also found my post ironic in that I was telling you what you should post/not post about you telling others what they should post/not post. I'm smart like that.

And if you don't want to deal with assholes then you should go back to sucking cocks of retarded horses. Retards should not be retarding the retards of retarded retards.

[lance strongarm]

Originally Posted by lance strongarm

I'll politely ask you not to be an asshole too. I doubt you'll comply. Let's see.

Originally Posted by Drunky Smurf

I also found my post ironic in that I was telling you what you should post/not post about you telling others what they should post/not post. I'm smart like that.

And if you don't want to deal with assholes then you should go back to sucking cocks of retarded horses. Retards should not be retarding the retards of retarded retards.

I was right, you failed not to be an asshole. Oh well. Maybe you'll grow up someday, maybe not.

[Morgyn]

Fascinating that you first made your decision about which side of the argument was wrong and then acquired the knowledge to support that decision (ETA: Or at least think you have knowledge supporting your position.)

Not that you are unique -- unfortunately a lot of people think this way.

Was that brazil's response to my post? I've had ol' bs on ignore for some time now. However, since Gyrate was kind enough to quote it, I'll respond.

Sweetie, what I had before I read this thread was a decent background in science, training in logic, and a brain capable of reason. I've read quite a few things about evolution and genetics beyond what I was taught in high school and college because the subjects interested me, so I had enough familiarity with them to come to a conclusion long ago.

What I've gotten here was a great deal of in-depth knowledge from experts, almost a master's class in evolution, genetics, and debate. To be clear: this thread has given me resources that are an addition to information I had already acquired and on which I had based a conclusion.

You, however, are simply deluded. Nothing you've cited (some of which I actually looked at before I decided to ignore you because, damn, boy, the idiocy burns) bears any resemblance to science. I suspect that the irony of your statement that I'd reached a conclusion and then looked for evidence to support it is completely lost on you, too.

And now I shall happily go back to ignoring the delusional lackwit and following up on some more links, because this stuff is just fascinating.

[brazil84]

Originally Posted by Morgyn

To be clear: this thread has given me resources that are an addition to information I had already acquired and on which I had based a conclusion.

Lol, nice weasel. What you said before was that you had lacked the knowledge (or patience) to refute my "nonsense." And yet you pre-judged it to be "nonsense."

You, however, are simply deluded. Nothing you've cited (some of which I actually looked at before I decided to ignore you because, damn, boy, the idiocy burns) bears any resemblance to science.

Please show me an example of something I cited which does not bear any resemblance to science. And we'll see who's deluded.

irony of your statement that I'd reached a conclusion and then looked for evidence to support it is completely lost on you, too.

I'm pretty confident that you are deluded enough to think I'm the one who's reasoning backwards. It will be interesting to see if you are willing or able to back your claim about things I have cited. Most likely you will invent some rationalization for failing to do so. Which suggests that you are the one who is deluded.