|
|
|
#51
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
| Advertisements | |
|
|
|
|
#52
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'm just wondering how can the police be looking for spider-man, yet not analyze the webs and see where he got them from.
|
|
#53
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
But it's one thing to keep a machine around in a (theoretically) secure lab after you've decided it has too many problems to be worth using; it's quite another to pass up the opportunity to destroy it when you know a psycho is on his way to use it. |
|
#54
|
|||
|
|||
|
Finally saw it last night. Overall, it was what I expected, which is fine. Lots of familiar territory, but I was in the mood for a Spiderman movie.
Small things: Given that Peter had brought up the idea that radical changes in temperature could affect the Lizard, way before the final fight, it was stupid not to arm himself with fire extinguishers and tell everybody he could to find supplies of liquid nitrogen or whatever. One thing I really liked - small point, but I think it was intentional - after Peter first gets home after being bitten, he catches a fly by plucking it out of the air. After he lets it go - he smells and almost licks his fingers. Disgusting, but cool. Having spider DNA has bad side effects as well as good ones. |
|
#55
|
|||
|
|||
|
I saw this today and I wasn't very impressed.
First of all, I enjoyed Raimi's Spider-Men and so didn't see any point in a reboot that doesn't take a fundamentally different approach, as Nolan did with Batman. But I wasn't thinking about that when I went into the cinema; I expected to enjoy the film. I suppose my biggest problem with the film is I just didn't like this Peter Parker. He seems to be trying to look like Robert Pattinson's character in Twilight. Also his pre- and post-bite characters aren't as radically different as I felt they should be. Peter is already confident and has some physical ability/daring (inferred from his skateboard) and almost no attempt is made to make him come across as any kind of nerd. We're told he's smart but it's just not convincing. I didn't really care about Gwen Stacy either. As for Curt Connors, how many times will we see the "well-meaning-genius-experiments-on-himself-and-goes-crazy-about-his-technology" antagonist in these superhero films? Apart from the characters, I also found the action a little disappointing. The rules for what Spider-Man can do seem to be "what would a 10 year old think is cool?". Dodging bullets is too much. A football bending a metal post is also ridiculous. A few other things I can't think of right now also seemed over the top. |
|
#56
|
|||
|
|||
|
Very disappointing.
It just felt like a generic superhero movie. Like they were going down a checklist. Hero discovers new powers? Check. Mutant villain whose alter ego is a friend of the hero? Check. Girlfriend in peril? Check. Boring. The score was repeatedly used as a crutch for a lifeless script. There must have been at least five extended segments with no dialogue and just a cloying score telling us how we are supposed to feel. I loved how the lizard gas bomb kept announcing "Lizard gas bomb will explode in T minus three minutes..." Good of them to include a handy loudspeaker on the device. And how can you have a Spider-Man movie without his comic foil J. Jonah Jameson? How??? The ONLY way in which this movie was superior to even the least of the Raimi films is that Emma Stone is a far superior actress to Kirsten Dunst. (Well, OK, maybe the FX are better, too, but the filmmakers can't take credit for advances in technology.) |
|
#57
|
|||
|
|||
|
I noticed a wedding ring on the villain's hand. I remember he had a wife and son from the cartoon, but don't remember if he had them in the comic book. They weren't mentioned in the movie, anyway.
|
|
#58
|
|||
|
|||
|
Oh yeah, I forgot to mention this. Big mistake!
|
|
#59
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Quote:
For all the praise I've read and heard, this really isn't as great as the first Raimi film (although I too prefer Emma Stone to Kirsten Dunst). Andrew Garfield just doesn't sell me that he's Peter Parker the way Tobey Maguire did, and I thought he got too chummy with Flash Thompson a little too quickly. And a skateboard before getting his spider-bite? Not the guy I remember. |
|
#60
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yeah, that bugged the hell out of me, too.
|
|
#61
|
|||
|
|||
|
I think it would have been cool if the Lizard had used his newly formed police lizards as the first wave of his attack on Ozcorp. Instead we just see the cops changed and then..nothing until they're shown being cured.
Also the webs would vanish as soon as they were spun. This was most noticible when he was swinging under the bridge. Otherwise it was a pretty good movie, but not the equal of 1 or 2. |
|
#62
|
|||
|
|||
|
The first Raimi Spiderman didn't have Jameson either, did it?
|
|
#63
|
|||
|
|||
|
Oh yeah, it had him. Gave the movie a sense of humor that is really lacking in the new film.
|
|
#64
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#65
|
|||
|
|||
|
Saw this Saturday night and man was that a fucking waste of time and money (for everyone involved, audience and filmmakers included). I was laughing my ass off the whole time and not because of any intentional humor.
Where to start? SPOILER:
I'm certain there's plenty more dumb shit to point out that I've forgotten, but that should suffice to make my point. I know they were deliberately trying to make it all dark and serious a la Chris Nolan's Batman trilogy, but they completely and utterly failed in every possible way. All of the "dramatic" scenes were laughably overplayed and completely stalled the movie. Seriously this was an atrocious piece of shit. |
|
#66
|
|||
|
|||
|
Incredible coincidences:
That's just conservation of detail in a narrative, with respect to characters. Most stories have characters that fit together in very surprising, convenient ways. Is Les Miserables an atrocious piece of shit? They beat you over the head with plot points: Gwen's explanation at the end isn't exposition. Of course we know that. But we ... You know what? Fuck the spoilers. The thread title warns about spoilers and the movie's been out for a month. Of course we knew Peter had promised Captain Stacy to stay away from Gwen. We didn't know Gwen knew it - she had to be a pretty smart cookie to suss it out. It was pretty obvious she didn't know for a while - she was all, "Why's Peter being a dick to me?" |
|
#67
|
|||
|
|||
|
While I agree with the larger points you make, "Flash" is name the character has had since 1962 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flash_Thompson
|
|
#68
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'm not reading for spoiler's sake, but I had to share this: the title of this thread is what convinced my sister to NOT go see this in theaters and wait for a home video release. I read it to her, and she said that "pretty good" wasn't enough to go wasting money on it.
She's been a huge Spidey fan ever since the first movie, so I can only surmise that Spider-Man 3 disappointed her a lot more than she let on. Last edited by BigT; 08-09-2012 at 01:15 PM. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|