|
|
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Mars where rover touched down looks ‘Earth-like’: How long before the conspiracy theories start?
|
| Advertisements | |
|
|
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
[CT Begins]
Obviously the atmosphere on Mars is much thicker than they tell us it is. Otherwise there wouldn't be dust blowing in the wind and the landers wouldn't be able to use parachutes. [/CT] |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
"The ancient Martian crater where the Curiosity rover landed looks strikingly similar to the Mojave Desert in California with its looming mountains and hanging haze, scientists said Wednesday."
Connect the dots people!!! THE MOJAVE DESERT IS ON MARS!!! |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
How long before someone appears on one of the CT websites claiming that he was out driving in the Mojave and came across the rover, then had his camera confiscated and his life threatened by men in black waving federal badges?
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Doesn't this thing have HD cameras? Where are the pictures? I just see a low-res video with crappy CGI.
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
When the penguins march by
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
This was posted as a comment for the linked article:
Quote:
Do I win? |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
How long before the CT's start?
Why, it was all a hoax from Tee Minus One and everyone with a lick-o-sense knew it! Well HUMPH! Who in his right mind ever believed in the first place that we sent a mission to Mars? Fools all!
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
I have to admit, so far the photos kind of look like anywhere 10 miles outside of Las Vegas, but without the billboards.
|
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
But the billboards have been there for ages....... OMG, they've invented a time machine and they're using Mars as cover for testing it!!
|
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hell, there are large swaths of the Western US that look exactly like that! Just off the top of my head, it could pass for large portions of Arizona, New Mexico, Utah, or Nevada. Probably southern California and western Texas too, but I haven't personally been to either state.
|
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Damn it Cohagaan! Those people need air!
|
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Geez. |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
It's hard to tell anymore. |
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
Upon more detailed analysis of the photos, I am all the more convinced of the monstrous hoax this is! Those pictures are from Tatooine!
|
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
These people are aware that we've had pictures from the surface of Mars since 1976, right?
|
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
You're soooo naive. ![]()
|
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
|
No, no HD cameras. The photos HD cameras produce require too much bandwidth to transmit and storage space to store on the lander. They have been optimized to be robust and reliable. From what I've read, the actual camera technology being used is apparently about 7-8 years old, having been frozen early in the design to be consistent with the KISS principle. Reliability is the key word here.
|
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
|
You can plainly tell this photos are from Planet X or Nabooty or whatever it's called. From the shadows it's obviously on a collision course with Earth!
|
|
#21
|
|||
|
|||
|
That mountain range in the distance looks very earth-like. So it seems that Mars did have some plate tectonics, and enough crustal movement to form metamorphic rocks.
I look forward to pictures of the rocks-hope they find some puddingstone. |
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
|
Personally I am waiting for pictures of umkay flying by in her wheelchair O' death, then we will know it is a hoax
![]() ![]() CAPT Sorry couldn't help myself |
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
If it's a joke, it's not as funny as Phil Kessel ... or the new team in Markham.
Last edited by LC Strawhouse; 08-10-2012 at 05:16 PM. |
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quibble. Thats not a mountain range, it's the rim of the gale crater which the rover is inside.
|
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Also, please stop with the off-topic threadshitting hijacks? |
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
My understanding is that they can't make/transmit higher rez images until the rover software is upgraded in the next few days and they turn on more of the instruments. |
|
#28
|
|||
|
|||
|
Well, hell -- wiki says all 17 cameras are 1600x1200 resolution. Or just under 2 megapixels. So it is "HD", but not terribly good resolution. What were they thinking?
|
|
#29
|
|||
|
|||
|
Moderator note
LC Stawhouse, if you have an issue with Leaffan, please take to the Pit.
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|