|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Why do so many cities have a union station?
I notice that Dallas is not one of those that has a "union" station.
http://www.straightdope.com/columns/...-union-station In fact, it has a RE-union station. I thought it might be because that's where families and friends would have a reunion when traveling to see each other, but that's presumptuous since not everyone travels to make a reunion. Certainly it wasn't a resurgence of the Labor movement, at least not in Texas. So, would it be a RE-consolidation of multiple rail stations in Dallas AGAIN? A similar (and worthless) lookup into the word "reiteration" showed that an ITERATION is to repeat. So RE-iteration is to repeat. Repeatedly. "So, let me reiterate. But I repeat myself. Again." |
| Advertisements | |
|
|
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
A "Union Station" is(or used to be) a railway station used by two or more different railways, allowing passengers to transfer from one railway to another.
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Nice architecture, too, apparently. Reminds me an awful lot of my own local Union Station (which, alas, is only a museum now). ETA: I won't vouch for its accuracy (being Wikipedia and all), but this is a list of union stations (active, inactive, or no longer existing) in North America. Last edited by gnoitall; 08-17-2012 at 09:46 AM. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
I always thought it was a result of the War of Northern Agression. any time the evil Unionist forces took over a station they'd call it that.
Joking, onnnnnlllyyy joking. . . . |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|