Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-05-2017, 01:26 PM
Chefguy Chefguy is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Portlandia
Posts: 38,480
Why the giant wheels on old locomotives?

We were at the local train museum yesterday. They have some old locomotives that are enormous. The wheels on them are as tall as I am. Why were they so large? Was it a casting problem or because of an inferior alloy that would overheat a smaller wheel? Or some other reason that escapes me?

I was also impressed with the engineering skills it took to design those behemoths.
  #2  
Old 02-05-2017, 01:41 PM
engineer_comp_geek engineer_comp_geek is offline
Robot Mod in Beta Testing
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 19,943
The wheels on a steam locomotive were directly driven with no gearing. If you make the wheels too small, and as the train goes faster, you exceed how fast the engine can do its thing without coming apart, and you lose high end speed. Make the wheels too large, and the torque required to get the train moving from a stop becomes excessive if you are hauling a large, heavy load.

So the wheels that you see are a good balance between low-end torque and high-end speed.

Engines designed to haul heavy freight tended to have smaller wheels, where engines designed to haul passengers (higher speed, less weight) tended to have larger wheels.

Last edited by engineer_comp_geek; 02-05-2017 at 01:42 PM.
  #3  
Old 02-05-2017, 02:16 PM
MonkeyMensch MonkeyMensch is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Encinitas
Posts: 2,410
Given your location I'm guessing you maybe got a peek at SP 4449, in red and orange Daylight colors. If so, its 80" drivers were just about as big as locomotive wheels ever got in the North American rail systems. There might have been a couple of 84" drivers somewhere, but I know what you mean about tall wheel sets when compared to the 40" and 42" wheels you see on big locos today.

Good for you!
  #4  
Old 02-05-2017, 02:44 PM
scr4 scr4 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Alabama
Posts: 13,960
The GNR Stirling class with the 8 ft 1 in drive wheels was probably the most extreme example. I think the drive wheels became smaller after that, as technology advanced and they could build pistons/cylinders that could reciprocate at a higher rate.

Last edited by scr4; 02-05-2017 at 02:46 PM.
  #5  
Old 02-05-2017, 02:53 PM
Bert Nobbins Bert Nobbins is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 259
Quote:
Originally Posted by scr4 View Post
The GNR Stirling class with the 8 ft 1 in drive wheels was probably the most extreme example.
No, indeed. There was a 9-footer:

http://www.douglas-self.com/MUSEUM/L...er/9footer.htm

and a 10-footer, though that was definitely a freak.

http://www.douglas-self.com/MUSEUM/L.../hurricane.htm
  #6  
Old 02-05-2017, 02:57 PM
scr4 scr4 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Alabama
Posts: 13,960
p.s. Turns out there's an even more extreme example - the Bristol and Exeter 4-2-4T with their 9-ft diameter drive wheels. ETA: Ninja'd!

By the way, it's exactly the same reason why early bicycles (penny-farthings) originally had large wheels. The legs can only turn the wheel so fast. The larger the wheel, the faster you go. (Though in case of the bicycle, an equally important factor was that a large wheel makes the ride smoother. The invention of the pneumatic tire and the chain drive removed both of these factors.)

Last edited by scr4; 02-05-2017 at 02:58 PM.
  #7  
Old 02-05-2017, 04:18 PM
Chefguy Chefguy is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Portlandia
Posts: 38,480
Quote:
Originally Posted by engineer_comp_geek View Post
The wheels on a steam locomotive were directly driven with no gearing. If you make the wheels too small, and as the train goes faster, you exceed how fast the engine can do its thing without coming apart, and you lose high end speed. Make the wheels too large, and the torque required to get the train moving from a stop becomes excessive if you are hauling a large, heavy load.

So the wheels that you see are a good balance between low-end torque and high-end speed.

Engines designed to haul heavy freight tended to have smaller wheels, where engines designed to haul passengers (higher speed, less weight) tended to have larger wheels.
Good stuff; thanks.

MonkeyMensch: yes indeed. Very impressive up close. We've ridden the Christmas train when they roll it out for a couple of weeks each year.
  #8  
Old 02-05-2017, 04:24 PM
Snnipe 70E Snnipe 70E is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 3,782
I was told by an old steam train engineer that the size of drivers determined the speed of the engine. A rough estimate of the top speed of a steam engine was found by taking the diameter of drive wheels and multiplying by 10. Gave you the speed by MPH. To go faster would shake the engine apart.
  #9  
Old 02-05-2017, 05:53 PM
Melbourne Melbourne is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 3,318
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chefguy View Post
We were at the local train museum yesterday. They have some old locomotives that are enormous. The wheels on them are as tall as I am. Why were they so large? Was it a casting problem or because of an inferior alloy that would overheat a smaller wheel? Or some other reason that escapes me?

I was also impressed with the engineering skills it took to design those behemoths.
Additional factors for very early engines was the stess put by the wheel on the rail, and the slip when starting up.

Larger wheels have a larger contact patch, which meen they are less likely to break the rails.

If you watch the old film clips of steam engines starting up, you'll see the drive wheels slip. This is because the tourqe is not constant - it pulses. Faster engines with smaller wheels have faster pulses, which only works when the whole engine-wheel-rail system is better designed.

Conversely, larger wheels put the axle higher up, which is a bad thing.

Last edited by Melbourne; 02-05-2017 at 05:54 PM.
  #10  
Old 02-05-2017, 06:27 PM
Toledo Jim Toledo Jim is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Toledo
Posts: 107
The rule I heard is that he driver diameter in inches equals the running speed in miles per hour, which is close to what Snnipe 70E said. The top speed would be a bit higher, limited by the effective piston speed. You just can't get steam into and expanding and out of the cylinder fast enough beyond a certain point.
Some designs were limited in sustained speed by the boiler capacity, there was only so much steam available. Running beyond that point started to pull down the boiler pressure, essentially strangling the locomotive. Erie RR had two giant locomotives with three sets of driving wheels. Which meant three pairs of cylinders, etc, the third set of drivers was under the tender. The boiler couldn't mke enough steam to supply all that except at a very low speed and load. The Virginian RR had similar triplex locomotives, all of them (both rrs) had a short operating life.
__________________
Peace

Jim
  #11  
Old 02-05-2017, 06:56 PM
Mangosteen Mangosteen is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Namche Bazaar
Posts: 2,136
In the early 1980's I spent about 6 months in India riding the old steam locomotives from place to place.

Watching them steam into the train stations was one of the highlights of the trip. Even at that time they were being phased out. Sadly they are probably all but gone today.
  #12  
Old 02-23-2017, 10:47 AM
RavensLunatic RavensLunatic is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 1
a related question - the locomotive wheels had large solid pieces along the arc. are these to balance the wheel (seem too large for that) or did it provide some other benefit?
  #13  
Old 02-23-2017, 10:56 AM
scr4 scr4 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Alabama
Posts: 13,960
Quote:
Originally Posted by RavensLunatic View Post
a related question - the locomotive wheels had large solid pieces along the arc. are these to balance the wheel (seem too large for that) or did it provide some other benefit?
The piston rods and connecting rods (rods that connect the multiple wheels) are hanging from the wheels. The solid part of the wheel is on the opposite side, to balance the weight of the connecting rods and their supporting structure.
  #14  
Old 02-23-2017, 11:34 AM
Quercus Quercus is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: temperate forest
Posts: 6,708
Quote:
Originally Posted by Melbourne View Post
Conversely, larger wheels put the axle higher up, which is a bad thing.
Is a higher axle a bad thing just because of the difficulty of fitting the other locomotive parts around it, or something else?
  #15  
Old 02-23-2017, 11:49 AM
LSLGuy LSLGuy is online now
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Southeast Florida USA
Posts: 20,797
The higher the axle, the higher all the rest of the loco sits above the ground. Recognizing that rails are kinda close together, you get a big machine that's tall and narrow and has lots of weight up on top.

Which means it's tippy. All else equal you'd rather have a wider lower-slung machine to go faster around corners. Part of the reason train tracks have such wide curves is just avoiding tip-overs.

Last edited by LSLGuy; 02-23-2017 at 11:49 AM.
  #16  
Old 02-23-2017, 12:05 PM
scr4 scr4 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Alabama
Posts: 13,960
Specifically, the boiler needs to sit above the drive wheel axles. The boiler is the largest part of the locomotive. The drive wheels must be connected with solid axles - even if you could design one-sided wheel supports, it wouldn't work because the right/left cylinders will go out of sync.
  #17  
Old 02-23-2017, 03:25 PM
Melbourne Melbourne is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 3,318
Quote:
Originally Posted by scr4 View Post
Specifically, the boiler needs to sit above the drive wheel axles. The boiler is the largest part of the locomotive. The drive wheels must be connected with solid axles - even if you could design one-sided wheel supports, it wouldn't work because the right/left cylinders will go out of sync.
I think you could probably sync the cylinders. I think that the problem is that the train would drive off the rails.

The wheels are self-centering, but the self-centering is driven by the wheel at the other end of the axle.

You can feel this happening on a train. The characteristic sway of a train is synchronised to the self-centering action of the wheels on the track. If you go too fast for the train/wheel/track system, the train sways right off the track: this sets a maximum speed for a train, even on a straight level track.

Last edited by Melbourne; 02-23-2017 at 03:25 PM.
  #18  
Old 02-23-2017, 03:37 PM
scr4 scr4 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Alabama
Posts: 13,960
Quote:
Originally Posted by Melbourne View Post
The wheels are self-centering, but the self-centering is driven by the wheel at the other end of the axle.

You're right. The self-centering relies on the wheels on both sides being rigidly connected to each other.
  #19  
Old 02-23-2017, 04:22 PM
Johnny L.A. Johnny L.A. is online now
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: NoWA
Posts: 57,720
MPSIMS that has nothing to do with the GQ.

Tehachapi Loop (article)

Tehachapi Loop (video)
  #20  
Old 02-23-2017, 06:30 PM
Chefguy Chefguy is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Portlandia
Posts: 38,480
Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny L.A. View Post
MPSIMS that has nothing to do with the GQ.

Tehachapi Loop (article)

Tehachapi Loop (video)
Very cool, thanks.
  #21  
Old 02-23-2017, 07:42 PM
Chronos Chronos is offline
Charter Member
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: The Land of Cleves
Posts: 73,183
Theoretically, with a super-large wheel design like the Hurricane, couldn't you hang the boiler under the axle?

And to the torque question, doesn't that also depend on how far out from the center the piston rods connect, too? It seems to me that, for any given piston rate, the speed would be determined by the ratio of those two radii.
  #22  
Old 02-23-2017, 09:09 PM
Kiwi Fruit Kiwi Fruit is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Hamilton, NZ, Male
Posts: 721
Cool locomotive of the Great Western Railway, the Iron Duke class with 8 ft driver wheels. Of course they ran on the Brunel broad gauge of 7 ft 1/4 inch.
  #23  
Old 02-23-2017, 09:12 PM
LSLGuy LSLGuy is online now
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Southeast Florida USA
Posts: 20,797
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chronos View Post
...
And to the torque question, doesn't that also depend on how far out from the center the piston rods connect, too? It seems to me that, for any given piston rate, the speed would be determined by the ratio of those two radii.
You're right about the ratios. But the stroke of the piston in the cylinder is equal to 2x the radius where the piston rod connects to the wheel.

So the optimization problem trades off your "gear" ratio versus top speed versus piston stroke. Ideal bore vs. stroke ratios depend on intended cycle rate, metallurgy, and the steam's expansion ratio which in turn is driven by the boiler output pressure.

Last edited by LSLGuy; 02-23-2017 at 09:13 PM.
  #24  
Old 02-23-2017, 11:04 PM
scr4 scr4 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Alabama
Posts: 13,960
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chronos View Post
Theoretically, with a super-large wheel design like the Hurricane, couldn't you hang the boiler under the axle?
As we were discussing in another thread, the distance between the rails is usually much less than the width of the locomotive. The space between the drive wheels is smaller still.


If you click on the 2nd of the links Bert Nobbins posted, you'll see another solution: the boiler is on a separate chassis from the pistons and drive wheels. This solves the issue of the locomotive being too tall, but you end up with much less weight on the drive wheels, which means inadequate traction.
  #25  
Old 02-24-2017, 03:33 AM
eburacum45 eburacum45 is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Old York
Posts: 2,574
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chronos View Post
Theoretically, with a super-large wheel design like the Hurricane, couldn't you hang the boiler under the axle?
One of the earliest designs of locomotive actually did have the boiler under the axles. The Novelty was one of the locomotives that competed at the Rainhill Trials, and had a boiler underneath the chassis, and the 'footplate' and firebox were both above the wheels. A neat little loco, but woefully underpowered. Novelty

One of the builder/designers of Novelty went on to design the USS Monitor, one of the first steam-driven ironclads.

Last edited by eburacum45; 02-24-2017 at 03:33 AM.
  #26  
Old 02-24-2017, 07:12 AM
Chronos Chronos is offline
Charter Member
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: The Land of Cleves
Posts: 73,183
Yeah, I saw the crazy design on that link. I'm just trying to brainstorm other crazy designs.
  #27  
Old 02-24-2017, 08:47 AM
Sangahyando Sangahyando is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 1,977
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mangosteen View Post
In the early 1980's I spent about 6 months in India riding the old steam locomotives from place to place.

Watching them steam into the train stations was one of the highlights of the trip. Even at that time they were being phased out. Sadly they are probably all but gone today.
Genuine, everyday steam working on India's railways came to an end -- after many years' gradual fading-out -- approximately in the year 2000. In a few restricted locations in India, steam locos continue to be used; but consciously and deliberately as tourist- and railfan-bait -- which takes most of the shine off it for me.

Regrettably for folk such as myself, there is now almost nowhere left on earth where steam locos are in everyday, commercial use; as opposed to in "entertainment" roles of one or another kind.
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:53 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Send questions for Cecil Adams to: cecil@chicagoreader.com

Send comments about this website to: webmaster@straightdope.com

Terms of Use / Privacy Policy

Advertise on the Straight Dope!
(Your direct line to thousands of the smartest, hippest people on the planet, plus a few total dipsticks.)

Publishers - interested in subscribing to the Straight Dope?
Write to: sdsubscriptions@chicagoreader.com.

Copyright 2017 Sun-Times Media, LLC.

 
Copyright © 2017