The Straight Dope

Go Back   Straight Dope Message Board > Main > General Questions

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old 02-14-2005, 06:22 PM
marshmallow marshmallow is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Usage of phrase "all but"

(using the SDMB search for this is impossible as far as I can tell)

I don't like this phrase. The majority of the time it is used it simply doesn't make any sense. Sometimes I see it used in what I would consider a 'correct' way and I feel all warm and fuzzy inside...but that's far and few between.


First example

Quote:
Bakley all but gave up rights to her child

“It was clear to me this document was a setup for disaster for her,” said Goldstein. “They were setting up a condition for her to lose custody of the child.”

Of the prenuptial agreement, Goldstein said: “It totally stripped her of her rights — community property, separate property.”
What do you mean, "all but" gave up? SHE DID GIVE UP HER RIGHTS!

Here's an example I would consider 'correct': I went to the kitchen. I took out some bread, knives, dishes, peanut butter, and jelly. I left. I all but made a PB&J sandwich! That is to say, I didn't make one.

Second example


Quote:
Season hopes all but dashed

After nonproductive talks, no cancellation announcement seems to be coming soon.

DETROIT-The opportunity for a meaningful regular season in the NHL is about over. ....
But...it is over. There won't be a meaningful season. The hopes are dashed.

In the latest Scientific America (March 2005), page 30 lower right (which is what sparked me to start this thread):

Quote:
Off Target

...

This strategy received a setback last December, when the European drug maker AstraZeneca reported that its targeted therapy, Iressa (getitinib), shrank tumors but was no more effective than a placebo at extending the lives of patients with lung cancer. In light of this which study, which included 1,700 people, AstraZeneca withdrew its application for approval in Europe. The company's hopes of ever achieving blockbuster status for Iressa have now all but faded.
(emphasis mine)

*starts to twitch* B-B-But the hopes HAVE faded. Not only has it been pulled and shown to be useless but they are abandoning the project and moving on! How can there be any hope left?

Now, to end this...I found an example I consider used correctly:


Hooray for smut!

Quote:
Smut Filter Blocks All But Smut

...

In tests of hundreds of images, BAIR incorrectly blocked dozens of photographs including portraits, landscapes, animals, and street scenes. It banned readers from viewing news photos at time.com and newsweek.com, but rated images of oral sex, group sex, and masturbation as acceptable for youngsters.
Yes! Bravo! Right? Right? Am I being silly/stupid/ignorant about all this or do I perceive a real usage problem?
Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:49 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Send questions for Cecil Adams to: cecil@chicagoreader.com

Send comments about this website to: webmaster@straightdope.com

Terms of Use / Privacy Policy

Advertise on the Straight Dope!
(Your direct line to thousands of the smartest, hippest people on the planet, plus a few total dipsticks.)

Publishers - interested in subscribing to the Straight Dope?
Write to: sdsubscriptions@chicagoreader.com.

Copyright © 2013 Sun-Times Media, LLC.