#1  
Old 06-30-2016, 05:23 PM
jbaker jbaker is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 366
Underarm Hair

As discussed in a recent New York Times article, it seems that many women think that it is more hygienic to shave or otherwise remove pubic hair, even though the opposite is the case. I am saddened by this, since I am a man who is pro-pubic hair.

But I'm not pro-underarm hair. Is there a similar rationale under which women ideally should retain their underarm hair? What is the evolutionary purpose of underarm hair, anyway?
  #2  
Old 06-30-2016, 05:28 PM
silenus silenus is offline
The Turtle Moves!
Charter Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: SoCal
Posts: 48,579
Several theories. Some say it retains scent markers that were useful in some way. Others suggest it works as a dry lubricant. Both have elements of truthiness. But really, you should be asking "Why hasn't underarm hair been selected against, evolutionarily-speaking?"
  #3  
Old 06-30-2016, 05:40 PM
HMS Irruncible HMS Irruncible is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 7,067
Quote:
Originally Posted by jbaker View Post
As discussed in a recent New York Times article, it seems that many women think that it is more hygienic to shave or otherwise remove pubic hair, even though the opposite is the case. I am saddened by this, since I am a man who is pro-pubic hair.

But I'm not pro-underarm hair. Is there a similar rationale under which women ideally should retain their underarm hair? What is the evolutionary purpose of underarm hair, anyway?
Can't be bothered for a cite, but a couple of things:
  • Almost certainly we were originally covered completely with hair
  • And then we lost it
  • So the question is not why hair, but why did we lose it everywhere except there? Like why not hairy elbows or knees?

There is a body of research that says these regions emit pheremones that have a measurable effect on attraction and repulsion. If you look anatomically at the armpit and groin region, one thing they have in common is they're warmer than the rest of the body, and they have all these different stinky glands than the rest of our skin. Hair helps diffuse these odors, so it would seem that we keep the pit and pube hair around for sexual attraction purposes.

As for why someone would shave one and not the other, it's a cultural matter that defies easy explanation. Shaving wasn't common until fashions started revealing those areas, and I guess society decided that women needed to differentiate themselves from men in the hair department.

Personally, and here is where we get into my weirdo deal, I think pits should run wild and pubes should be shaven (I mean just access shaving, not pedophile shaving). Let's have all that pheremone awesomeness in the areas that are most exposed, and let's get rid of all that hair where somebody could get it up in their teeth. I'll go first.
  #4  
Old 06-30-2016, 06:06 PM
Bear_Nenno Bear_Nenno is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Nangarhar Province
Posts: 8,037
Quote:
Originally Posted by HMS Irruncible View Post
Can't be bothered for a cite, but a couple of things:
  • Almost certainly we were originally covered completely with hair
  • And then we lost it
  • So the question is not why hair, but why did we lose it everywhere except there? Like why not hairy elbows or knees?

There is a body of research that says these regions emit pheremones that have a measurable effect on attraction and repulsion. If you look anatomically at the armpit and groin region, one thing they have in common is they're warmer than the rest of the body, and they have all these different stinky glands than the rest of our skin. Hair helps diffuse these odors, so it would seem that we keep the pit and pube hair around for sexual attraction purposes.

As for why someone would shave one and not the other, it's a cultural matter that defies easy explanation. Shaving wasn't common until fashions started revealing those areas, and I guess society decided that women needed to differentiate themselves from men in the hair department.

Personally, and here is where we get into my weirdo deal, I think pits should run wild and pubes should be shaven (I mean just access shaving, not pedophile shaving). Let's have all that pheremone awesomeness in the areas that are most exposed, and let's get rid of all that hair where somebody could get it up in their teeth. I'll go first.
Pedophile shaving? Really??

When a body builder waxes his entire body from the neck down, would you also suggest he does it to look like a child or that someone would be attracted to a clean shaven man because it makes him look like a child?

Last edited by Bear_Nenno; 06-30-2016 at 06:07 PM.
  #5  
Old 06-30-2016, 06:16 PM
Kimstu Kimstu is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 19,649
Quote:
Originally Posted by jbaker View Post
Is there a similar rationale under which women ideally should retain their underarm hair? What is the evolutionary purpose of underarm hair, anyway?
The Master speaks.
  #6  
Old 06-30-2016, 06:22 PM
TriPolar TriPolar is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: rhode island
Posts: 37,454
Quote:
Originally Posted by HMS Irruncible View Post
Can't be bothered for a cite, but a couple of things:
  • Almost certainly we were originally covered completely with hair
  • And then we lost it
  • So the question is not why hair, but why did we lose it everywhere except there? Like why not hairy elbows or knees?
We didn't lose it so much as it became much finer hair. We aren't born with the hair we're talking about, so clearly this hair is related to physical maturation, perhaps not as easy to change it's formation genetically.
  #7  
Old 06-30-2016, 06:27 PM
Kimstu Kimstu is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 19,649
Quote:
Originally Posted by jbaker View Post
Is there a similar rationale under which women ideally should retain their underarm hair?
Well, shaving it can damage the underarm skin.
Quote:
The results clearly demonstrate that shaving the underarm consistently removes skin (stratum corneum) as well as axillary hair (with a mean value of 36.1% of the debris being skin). OCT measurements demonstrated that in shaved areas of the axilla, epidermal thickness is higher than in unshaved areas. In response to histamine, wheal and flare were both found to be greater in the shaved axilla, when compared with an unshaved control, but flare in the fossa was greater than that in the vault. On the basis of these results, we propose that the axillary vault has adapted to frequent shaving, notably by the development of a thickened epidermis. However, this adaptation is often not sufficient to fully protect the axilla from damage and irritation resulting from hair removal (shaving).
Everything you never wanted to know about underarm rashes, including ones caused by shaving. Warning: photos.
Quote:
Armpit hair shaving using a razor, especially an old or dull razor can irritate, break, cause razor burn, raised red bumps, ingrown hair or even cause infections to the delicate and sensitive armpit skin leading to an armpit shaving rash.
And of course, it's just one more unnecessary nuisance task to add to the routine health and hygiene regimen. You probably wouldn't want to have to do it yourself.
  #8  
Old 06-30-2016, 07:16 PM
HMS Irruncible HMS Irruncible is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 7,067
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bear_Nenno View Post
When a body builder waxes his entire body from the neck down, would you also suggest he does it to look like a child or that someone would be attracted to a clean shaven man because it makes him look like a child?
Sounds like you're the expert; you tell me.
  #9  
Old 06-30-2016, 07:24 PM
jbaker jbaker is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 366
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kimstu View Post
Well, shaving it can damage the underarm skin.


Everything you never wanted to know about underarm rashes, including ones caused by shaving. Warning: photos.


And of course, it's just one more unnecessary nuisance task to add to the routine health and hygiene regimen. You probably wouldn't want to have to do it yourself.
Well, yes, but it sounds like there are hygienic advantages to pubic hair even aside from the potential harm of shaving or depilation. Does underarm hair have anything comparable to offer?
  #10  
Old 06-30-2016, 07:26 PM
Bear_Nenno Bear_Nenno is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Nangarhar Province
Posts: 8,037
Quote:
Originally Posted by HMS Irruncible View Post
Sounds like you're the expert; you tell me.
I'd rather not tell you what I think. I'll let you say it http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/...d.php?t=785838
  #11  
Old 06-30-2016, 08:20 PM
Kimstu Kimstu is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 19,649
Quote:
Originally Posted by jbaker View Post
Well, yes, but it sounds like there are hygienic advantages to pubic hair even aside from the potential harm of shaving or depilation. Does underarm hair have anything comparable to offer?
Not in terms of protecting mucous membranes from bacteria, certainly, because there aren't any mucous membranes in the armpit. As silenus noted, it may serve to reduce skin-on-skin friction from the movement of the arms against the body, but people who remove their underarm hair don't seem to be particularly bothered by that friction.

Last edited by Kimstu; 06-30-2016 at 08:20 PM.
  #12  
Old 06-30-2016, 08:21 PM
Ignotus Ignotus is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,003
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kimstu View Post
And of course, it's just one more unnecessary nuisance task to add to the routine health and hygiene regimen. You probably wouldn't want to have to do it yourself.
Hey, I shave my armpits! My chest too! Women like it, and it has never caused me the slightest inconvenience!
  #13  
Old 06-30-2016, 08:37 PM
SeaDragonTattoo SeaDragonTattoo is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Chicago, Far Northsider
Posts: 7,810
I wish more men would at least trim their pit hair. I think guys being stanky is just as unattractive as women being stanky. Plus, when there's bits of deodorant stuck in the pit-bush, I mean, congrats on attempting to smell fresh, but gross. And while you're at it with the clippers, do a little hedge trimming under that waistline, too.
  #14  
Old 06-30-2016, 08:51 PM
Ambivalid Ambivalid is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: In my head
Posts: 12,080
Im a man and i trim my pits and shave my balls. Hair is fucking gross.
  #15  
Old 06-30-2016, 09:08 PM
HMS Irruncible HMS Irruncible is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 7,067
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bear_Nenno View Post
I'd rather not tell you what I think. I'll let you say it http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/...d.php?t=785838
That's quite well done, but of course it's the old ad hominem in its most elemental undistilled form. Since you've taken it here, let's unpack your thing about waxing the entire body from the neck down, and the sexual issues with which that is totally not fraught with.
  #16  
Old 06-30-2016, 09:32 PM
HMS Irruncible HMS Irruncible is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 7,067
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bear_Nenno View Post
When a body builder waxes his entire body from the neck down, would you also suggest he does it to look like a child or that someone would be attracted to a clean shaven man because it makes him look like a child?
Honestly, I haven't been there and I can't say. Just from a rough guesstimate, I'll rule you out of the pedophile camp, so it seems like we need to unpack your whole attraction to a clean whole-body shaven man. Which, again, no judgment or inference, but from the context this is just apparently where you needed to go with this.

We have people here who are totally down with waxed bodybuilders, so you are in a safe space. It gets better.
  #17  
Old 06-30-2016, 09:57 PM
HMS Irruncible HMS Irruncible is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 7,067
Pardon my dick move. That wasn't cool. Apologies.
  #18  
Old 06-30-2016, 09:59 PM
octopus octopus is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 5,798
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ambivalid View Post
Im a man and i trim my pits and shave my balls. Hair is fucking gross.
I thought shaving some butt crack hair would reduce swamp ass. Nope. So while shaving the nutsack may be helpful I don't comprehend how people can live with crack stubble.
  #19  
Old 06-30-2016, 10:53 PM
HMS Irruncible HMS Irruncible is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 7,067
Quote:
Originally Posted by octopus View Post
I thought shaving some butt crack hair would reduce swamp ass. Nope. So while shaving the nutsack may be helpful I don't comprehend how people can live with crack stubble.
You can never shave the butt crack hair. Shave anything else, but you need some ventilation in the buttcrack. Not only does it attract fungus, but every fart sounds like a gunshot. Whatever your problem, there is a better solution. Fly like an eagle.
  #20  
Old 07-04-2016, 08:19 AM
dhricenak dhricenak is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 8
Q Interview

FWIW a while ago I heard an interview on the CBC radio program Q with a woman who not didn't shave her underarm hair but dyed it. It was implied that this was a trend but I haven't heard about it anywhere else. Not that I've looked too hard!

Last edited by dhricenak; 07-04-2016 at 08:19 AM.
  #21  
Old 07-04-2016, 11:28 AM
beowulff beowulff is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Scottsdale, more-or-less
Posts: 14,964
Holy crap.
Is this what GQ has become?
  #22  
Old 07-05-2016, 10:39 AM
MacLir MacLir is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 543
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kimstu View Post
Not in terms of protecting mucous membranes from bacteria, certainly, because there aren't any mucous membranes in the armpit. As silenus noted, it may serve to reduce skin-on-skin friction from the movement of the arms against the body, but people who remove their underarm hair don't seem to be particularly bothered by that friction.
As a competing example, at one time my main exercise was a NordicTrack which involves extended arm motion.

In a word, dreadlocks. Not that large; I'm not that hairy, but definite cohesion. The big problem was that they formed with my arms down, so when I reached up for something

Trimming solved the problem.
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:47 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Send questions for Cecil Adams to: cecil@chicagoreader.com

Send comments about this website to: webmaster@straightdope.com

Terms of Use / Privacy Policy

Advertise on the Straight Dope!
(Your direct line to thousands of the smartest, hippest people on the planet, plus a few total dipsticks.)

Publishers - interested in subscribing to the Straight Dope?
Write to: sdsubscriptions@chicagoreader.com.

Copyright 2017 Sun-Times Media, LLC.

 
Copyright © 2017