As defined by the Assault Weapons Ban of 1994,
here is what constitutes an "assault weapon":
Quote:
Semi-automatic rifles able to accept detachable magazines and two or more of the following:
Folding or telescoping stock
Pistol grip
Bayonet mount
Flash suppressor, or threaded barrel designed to accommodate one
Grenade launcher (more precisely, a muzzle device that enables launching or firing rifle grenades, though this applies only to muzzle mounted grenade launchers and not those mounted externally)
Semi-automatic pistols with detachable magazines and two or more of the following:
Magazine that attaches outside the pistol grip
Threaded barrel to attach barrel extender, flash suppressor, handgrip, or suppressor
Barrel shroud that can be used as a hand-hold
Unloaded weight of 50 oz (1.4 kg) or more
A semi-automatic version of a fully automatic firearm
Semi-automatic shotguns with two or more of the following:
Folding or telescoping stock
Pistol grip
Fixed capacity of more than 5 rounds
Detachable magazine
|
Keep in mind that these definitions were created with the express intention of banning weapons with these characteristics. There is nothing inherently more dangerous about these weapons in, say, 5.56 NATO/.223 Remington, than in any other weapon of that caliber. A weapon with a flash hider but lacking any other feature on the ban list is not an assault weapon, but add a bayonet lug and it is.
There are people that want to argue that the definition is fluid, and in the sense that they can add to the ban list it is, but this is the only definition codified into Federal law at any point and as such this is the answer.