|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
What if, say, all that we have known is actually wrong?
That's my short little question. What if everything that we (or you) have learned or found, even studied is wrong? What would that kind of thing be like?
By saying wrong, i meant that all that stuffs human have come across are actually differ from what the human perceived as fact. And this is not a field-specific thing, I meant EVERYTHING. Would this even matter? I know lots of people who couldn't care less about this, but I'm just being curious. Will being entirely, utterly, systematically wrong matter anything? On the side note: What is wrong, what is right? Please forgive my ignorant. |
| Advertisements | |
|
|
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
It'll boost the economy, since everyone will have to be given their money back and consumer spending will skyrocket.
Also - the OP is the best I have ever seen. Though I could be wrong.
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Welcome to the boards, thaelmax. I'm moving your question to the Great Debates section of the site instead of General Questions, which is for questions with factual answers.
But if everything we knew turned out to be wrong? I'd be a little embarrassed. If atomic theory was wrong I would be hesitant to touch anything and if gravity was wrong I'd be a bit nervous about going outside. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
What if everything we know is theoretically wrong? If what we perceived are just illusions, and suddenly someone pointed that out. All those astronomy, planet, solar system, and all those yadda yadda stuffs. For example: at my young age of five, I thought that when people talked about the expiration date of a bottle of Coke, they were talking about the expiration date of the bottle, not the Coke. It was hilarious when I found out the truth... |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ok. I think the question is, how would someone be able to just point all of that out? And would you be able to trust their version of things?
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
So you're asking what if, someday someone wakes up our bodies and unplugs them all from the Matrix?
Billions of people flopping around on the ground because their muscles have never been used...that's what'd happen. Last edited by pan1; 01-14-2010 at 01:32 PM. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
There really is no difference between something that for all demonstrable purposes acts like an electron and something that really is an electron. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
That is, unless logic is wrong. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Now if reason itself is simply an illusion, or the foundations of cause and effect, that way lies madness for all. |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
It's hard for me to understand exactly what you're asking, but does that answer your question? |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Did you learn this truth while on your way to throw the bottle off the edge of the world?
|
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Everything I know is wrong? Yikes! Although, it could make for an interesting weekend.
'If anything is possible, then it is possible for the statement "anything is possible" to be false.' I hurt my brain reading that one. |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yeah, what the bleep do we know?
|
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Most of the things most people think they know about the fundamentals of reality are wrong. It just doesn't matter at all in everyday life.
|
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I suspect that that's not really what you're looking for though. Yes, it's possible that all of reality is, for example, the dream of a giant pink elephant who is soon to awake. Unless there's something we can do about that, though, all that matters is what is actually relevant to us. It might be that the laws of physics are simply the momentary whims of space hobgoblins, but until they decide to change those laws, the parameters of those laws are still the ones we have to live by, day-to-day.
__________________
My Politics Blog |
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Don't go near the water 'til you have learned how to swim. Can a man drown in the fountain of eternal life? Your mission is not to accept the mission. Do you accept? Answer truthfully (yes or no) to the following question: Will the next word you say be 'no'? This sentence is false. |
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
|
If literally everything we know is revealed to be wrong, we would not be able to function at all in whatever the 'real' world is - we would at best be like newborn infants (or whatever is their equivalent in whatever the real world is) - because none of our experiences, thoughts, memories, reactions, senses, etc would be any use at all.
|
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'd feel better about sucking at pub trivia
|
|
#21
|
|||
|
|||
|
You'd have to demonstrate why "being wrong" would matter. If we're wrong, but everything works as if we were right, what's the problem?
|
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
|
Imagine if we one day learned that what we thought was solid matter was composed of "atoms" that were themselves mostly composed of empty space!
The horrors!!!
|
|
#23
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
When I go rampage in my mind, I once went across the thinking that we're not living, interacting with stuffs, we're just "floating above life". That idea was kind of weird. Quote:
Quote:
.Quote:
.
Last edited by thaelmax; 01-14-2010 at 04:27 PM. |
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
|
Occam's razor: it's easier to believe the guy saying everything is wrong, is wrong, instead of everything being wrong, so the evidence would have to be pretty compelling.
Besides, I could buy that Relativity and Quantum Mechanics might eventually be supplanted by a different model of the universe that explains some things R and QM can't. The effect on day-to-day existence will be negligible, though, unless that new theory leads to the construction of futuristicky mega-reactors that supply infinite energy, or something. |
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
In a world that used to be, close your eyes and follow me Where the children laugh and the children play And we'll sing a song all day - Clint Holmes I would actually prefer an alternate reality in which that song had never been released. |
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
|
The closest cases I can think of that might be analogous are people removed from cults or cult-like situations; children kept locked up and mis-educated by abusive or crazy parents, peons in re-education camps in places like North Korea, children of fanatics of various stripes (racist, religious, political, etc.).
Not the same thing, of course, but still, a broad amount of their "knowledge" of the way things work (socially at least) will turn out to be utterly wrong. Maybe there are autobiographies or first-person accounts by such people that you would find enlightening? |
|
#28
|
|||
|
|||
|
People adapt to whatever reality they are presented with.
|
|
#29
|
|||
|
|||
|
I dunno - some people seem to resist adaptation. Flat-earthers, anyone?
|
|
#30
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Or, so I thought. It turns out that I was just mistaken. |
|
#31
|
|||
|
|||
|
We can't be wrong about everything, because there would be no way to determine it, were it so. Being wrong assumes some fact of the matter which is correct against which to judge the correctness or incorrectness of other things.
|
|
#32
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thanks for your responses, I think I got what I wondered now. But if you may care, would you mind telling me about the significance of, erm, righteousness? Because it have been quite confusing to me. When i was in school, they all taught me to always try to get right; but later in life, i saw that there are lots of things are not to be done rightly.
So, what's the significance of that, in terms of non-scientific purposes? Last edited by thaelmax; 01-16-2010 at 10:26 PM. |
|
#33
|
|||
|
|||
|
Really, to be honest and cooperative, our species would've died out millenia ago if "I ate this last week and it did not kill me. I can probably eat it today and, again, it will not kill me," had not been generally accurate. To claim a rule that everything we, as a species, is wrong dooms us within a few days of its implementation. It is truly nonsensical.
|
|
#34
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yes, it is a nonsensical premise. It is possible to cogently consider: what if everything is "incomplete / energy with the illusion of form" or "holographic / simulated by the matrix"? But "wrong"? Don't think so.
|
|
#35
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
If by "righteousness" you instead meant "correctness", correctness is generally useful because it is often the case that you can make better decisions with more correct, and more detailed, information. That is, we can make much better computers if we know something about the electical conductivity of metals. On the other hand, though, just because there is a better way to do things doesn't mean all other ways are unacceptable; there are lots of cases where technically inferior outcomes are still perfectly acceptable. For example, if I am under the mistaken impression that bananas taste better than strawberries, then I'd probably stick to the bananas, which would deprive me of the joy of strawberrys but is still by no means fatal - bananas are pretty good too. Of course, there are limits here - having the wrong idea about the effects of pavement on a rapidly falling body could lead a person to a decidedly suboptimal choice of hobbies. There's kind of a continuum of badness here, and differing people may disagree on how to rank the consequences of various courses of action. By the way, when you said, "lots of things are not to be done rightly", what were you talking about? That it's better to use inches than planck lengths when measuring the boards for your birdhouse, or that when your appendix bursts it's a great plan to avoid medical attention in favor of prayer? |
|
#36
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Though apparently, it's much different than that of America. My uncertainty was resolved. |
|
#37
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
* new world order: "In your county it should be done that way, but 'round these here parts we do it this way." |
|
#38
|
|||
|
|||
|
From Sleeper:
Dr. Melik: This morning for breakfast he requested something called "wheat germ, organic honey and tiger's milk." Dr. Aragon: [chuckling] Oh, yes. Those are the charmed substances that some years ago were thought to contain life-preserving properties. Dr. Melik: You mean there was no deep fat? No steak or cream pies or... hot fudge? Dr. Aragon: Those were thought to be unhealthy... precisely the opposite of what we now know to be true. Dr. Melik: Incredible. |
|
#39
|
|||
|
|||
|
If all we’ve assumed was right is wrong, then all we've assumed was wrong is right. No, now that we assume that is right, it must be wrong. No…wait…
|
|
#40
|
|||
|
|||
|
If this happens tomorrow, your post would be wrong, so everything else will be right. But that can't be, so everything must be wrong except your post. But that can't be, since everything, including your post, must be wrong.
::SPARKS FLY OUT OF EARS. BRAIN MELTS:: |
|
#41
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
#42
|
|||
|
|||
|
Well I know that's a lie because Charlamange is speled wrong.
|
|
#43
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
(Also, if time wasn't real, how could people 'move on'?) Last edited by Mangetout; 01-22-2010 at 06:03 AM. |
|
#44
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Last edited by devilsknew; 01-22-2010 at 11:55 AM. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|