The Straight Dope

Go Back   Straight Dope Message Board > Main > In My Humble Opinion (IMHO)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51  
Old 09-25-2012, 09:26 PM
Ambivalid Ambivalid is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by IvoryTowerDenizen View Post
Christ, why'd you ask?
Are you kidding me? If someone doesn't want to watch, they don't have to open the thread. Me not posting it doesn't affect whether or not they watch it. I asked because I wanted to know WHO WAS INTERESTED. Get it?


And if I miscontrued Sandra nz's comment, then I offer my apologies to her. It can be tricky sometimes interpreting a person's tone and intent when the communication is strictly text.
Reply With Quote
Advertisements  
  #52  
Old 09-25-2012, 09:28 PM
Ambivalid Ambivalid is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
[quote=IvoryTowerDenizen;15528079]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ambivalid View Post

It's a conversation not a monologue. Get a blog if you want to control the conversation.

You were rude and short with her for no reason other than the fact she made a suggestion about something in your life she found intriguing. You're not obligated to have the conversation, but don't read motives into a pretty typical message board event: thread drift.
I know it's not a monologue. However, she said she was interested in a "discussion" that no one was having. How is that different from "hijacking"?
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 09-25-2012, 09:30 PM
IvoryTowerDenizen IvoryTowerDenizen is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: North Shore of LI
Posts: 10,588
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ambivalid View Post
Should I post it? If there is no, or scant, interest shown I won't bother.
One answer to this question is "no".
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old 09-25-2012, 09:32 PM
IvoryTowerDenizen IvoryTowerDenizen is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: North Shore of LI
Posts: 10,588
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ambivalid View Post

I know it's not a monologue. However, she said she was interested in a "discussion" that no one was having. How is that different from "hijacking"?
She wasn't trying to takeover or re-direct this thread, which s hijacking. Perhaps she was suggesting to start a new thread, because she thought the topic was, I dunno, interesting? Or, if you we're interested in discussing in this thread, that's ok too. Hijacking is only a problem when it derails a thread. A thread evolving is different. Friendly suggestion- you need to lighten up a bit.

Last edited by IvoryTowerDenizen; 09-25-2012 at 09:35 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #55  
Old 09-25-2012, 10:00 PM
Ambivalid Ambivalid is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
To ITD, Sandra_nz and anyone else I may have offended in this thread; please accept my apology. This entire training/prep regimen has been extremely stressful and difficult for me and I am stretched to my limit and cranky, irritable and short-tempered from it. It's not an excuse, it's an explanation. I probably shouldn't even be on the computer when I'm in such a state. I'm sorry.
Reply With Quote
  #56  
Old 09-25-2012, 10:01 PM
IvoryTowerDenizen IvoryTowerDenizen is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: North Shore of LI
Posts: 10,588
No worries. Hope you feel better, soon.
Reply With Quote
  #57  
Old 09-26-2012, 10:30 AM
levdrakon levdrakon is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ambivalid View Post
Because if I did, you would just have to watch it, right?
No, I was just using reverse psychology on you. People saying they'd like to see the vid is obviously not going to work, so if we say we don't want to see it maybe you'll actually post it. Or not. Whatevs.
Reply With Quote
  #58  
Old 10-01-2012, 02:54 PM
Ambivalid Ambivalid is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
I had my competition; I lost by one point. One point. There were five judges and three out of the five chose my competitor as the winner; two chose me. It was a good competition and I'm ok with the outcome. I wasn't even sure if there was going to be anyone else to compete against, and I would much rather lose by one point than win against nobody (or lesser competition).

The only reason I haven't posted a link yet is because I am waiting to get a good video of my routine. The one I have now is blurry and far away and not very good. It'll still be a few days, I imagine.
Reply With Quote
  #59  
Old 10-06-2012, 07:40 PM
DSeid DSeid is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
So, it's been a few days. Post the blurry one at least man.
Reply With Quote
  #60  
Old 10-06-2012, 10:08 PM
Rhiannon8404 Rhiannon8404 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 4,858
I'm looking forward to seeing it, even if it's the blurry one.
Reply With Quote
  #61  
Old 10-07-2012, 09:26 PM
Ambivalid Ambivalid is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
I am having some difficulty getting my professional copy of the show but it will be coming. I am not going to post the blurry one that my sister recorded from her phone, as it is not only blurry but far away and really does not look good at all.

In the meantime I can post this pic to show that I really did compete.


ETA: I know I really need to work on my facial expressions. Dammit.

Last edited by Ambivalid; 10-07-2012 at 09:27 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:21 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Send questions for Cecil Adams to: cecil@chicagoreader.com

Send comments about this website to: webmaster@straightdope.com

Terms of Use / Privacy Policy

Advertise on the Straight Dope!
(Your direct line to thousands of the smartest, hippest people on the planet, plus a few total dipsticks.)

Publishers - interested in subscribing to the Straight Dope?
Write to: sdsubscriptions@chicagoreader.com.

Copyright © 2013 Sun-Times Media, LLC.