The Straight Dope

Go Back   Straight Dope Message Board > Main > General Questions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-24-2009, 10:35 AM
Polycarp Polycarp is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: A better place to be
Posts: 26,718
Superhighways Before the Interstates

In an active thread about train travel 50-150 years ago, the comment was made that typically car travel was along two-lane roads passing through every community, and hence much slower than today. jayjay raised the issue of the Pennsylvania Turnpike predating the Interstate system, and other limited-access superhighways like the New York State Thruway and Connecticut's Wilbur Cross Highway might be added to that list.

So my question is, before the late 1950s when the Interstate system was being put in place, what was available in the way of limited-access highways? Where could one travel between without having to slow down for the metropolises of Prairie Dog Corners and Resume Speed?
Reply With Quote
Advertisements  
  #2  
Old 12-24-2009, 10:52 AM
IAmNotSpartacus IAmNotSpartacus is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Surely you've heard of US Route 66. That's probably as close as you can get.

Last edited by IAmNotSpartacus; 12-24-2009 at 10:53 AM..
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-24-2009, 11:03 AM
Exapno Mapcase Exapno Mapcase is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: NY but not NYC
Posts: 22,839
Quote:
Originally Posted by IAmNotSpartacus View Post
Surely you've heard of US Route 66. That's probably as close as you can get.
But it's not close at all. Route 66 passed through all the small towns along the way. They depended on the business that being on the route gave them and furiously fought the coming of the Interstates that would bypass them.

The answer is that before the Interstate System, America had some limited-access highways. But these were small and local and not interconnected with one another in any national grid. You couldn't escape the small towns if you wanted to make a major trip across several states. That was one of the design standards behind the Interstates, to avoid small towns and their speed limits (and speed traps).
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-24-2009, 11:03 AM
md2000 md2000 is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
I assume the problem - which the interstate system was meant to address - was that the turnpike-type roads were local and the voters who fudned them very parochial. There was no incentive for New York to fund a fancy highway from Buffalo toward Cleveland to the border, or toward Boston. Similarly - did the Pennsylvania Turnpike stop at Pittsburgh or carry on to the Ohio border?

In the remote states, was there the traffic or money to build decent roads for people just passing thorugh? Nobody wanted the highway to bypass their town and businesses, until the road traffic became too heavy and annoying.

It's a chicken-and-egg scenario. What came first, the traffic or the roads?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-24-2009, 11:06 AM
cjepson cjepson is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
There were a number of parkways built in the early to mid 20th century, many begun as New Deal public works projects. Besides the Wilbur Cross Parkway you mentioned, Connecticut also had the Merritt Parkway (built 1934-1940); New York has the Taconic State Parkway (built in several sections between 1929 and 1963). Then there's the Blue Ridge Parkway, begun in 1935 (and not completed until 1987!), and the George Washington Memorial Parkway around D.C., authorized in 1930. In Rhode Island, I remember the part of US 1 running through the southern part of the state being a limited access parkway prior to the coming of the interstates.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-24-2009, 11:17 AM
Richie Incognito Richie Incognito is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
The Lincoln Highway was the first road across the U.S. From what wikipedia indicates, it was completed in 1913.

I used to actually live right by one of the routes (Rt. 206 in NJ) which made up this highway.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lincoln_Highway

-R. Incognito
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-24-2009, 11:18 AM
IAmNotSpartacus IAmNotSpartacus is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by Exapno Mapcase View Post
But it's not close at all. Route 66 passed through all the small towns along the way. They depended on the business that being on the route gave them and furiously fought the coming of the Interstates that would bypass them.
It didn't pass through "all the small towns," and many of those towns sprung up because of the highway, so you are suggesting some self-fulfilling prophecy that's a non-starter at best. One would hope that it would go without saying that a long distance highway is necessarily and inherently going to need to have towns on it, for gasoline and lodging and meals and so forth.

Of course, what's also interesting is that many of those towns on Route 66 have been long abandoned, replaced by other towns that sprung up once the interstates were built. Curiously, one still finds towns on the interstates and the major economies are taking care of travelers.. food, lodging, fuel etc. It's not coincidental.
Quote:
The answer is that before the Interstate System, America had some limited-access highways. But these were small and local and not interconnected with one another in any national grid. You couldn't escape the small towns if you wanted to make a major trip across several states. That was one of the design standards behind the Interstates, to avoid small towns and their speed limits (and speed traps).
I think I am confused. Route 66 doesn't fit because it went through small towns. But you say if someone wants to take a highway to get somewhere, they are going to find small towns.

Are you suggesting the early highways started and terminated out in the boonies? Highways, by definition, are designed to get someone from Point A to Point B. What good is a highway if it doesn't go anywhere?


Can you cite me some of these rural highways that were small and local and not interconnected and did not pass through small towns?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-24-2009, 11:26 AM
jayjay jayjay is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Quote:
Originally Posted by Richie Incognito View Post
The Lincoln Highway was the first road across the U.S. From what wikipedia indicates, it was completed in 1913.

I used to actually live right by one of the routes (Rt. 206 in NJ) which made up this highway.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lincoln_Highway

-R. Incognito
Ditto here. Lincoln Highway follows US Rte. 30, which goes right through Lancaster. It's actually on the other side of the block my house is on (as in, if you could walk through our back yard, our neighbor behind's back yard, and our neighbor behind's house, you'd be on the sidewalk looking at Lincoln Highway (Columbia Ave)).
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-24-2009, 11:29 AM
Musicat Musicat is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Sturgeon Bay, WI USA
Posts: 17,223
The Interstate highway system was a significant engineering upgrade from existing turnpikes -- it was more than just an extension of routes. Look at the Pasadena Freeway, which predates the National US design. Compared to later roads, it has sharper curves, narrower lanes, brief merge & exit lanes or none at all (a stop sign at the end of the freeway's on-ramp was typical). These early experiments with traffic concepts may have paved the way, but they were inadequate for the cars and drivers that came later.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-24-2009, 11:30 AM
elmwood elmwood is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Upstate New York
Posts: 9,249
Quote:
Originally Posted by Polycarp View Post
So my question is, before the late 1950s when the Interstate system was being put in place, what was available in the way of limited-access highways? Where could one travel between without having to slow down for the metropolises of Prairie Dog Corners and Resume Speed?
The Interstates were first formally announced in the 1950s (the system and routes were first conceived and planned in the 1930s), but widespread construction really didn't begin until the 1960s. Cross-county travel in the 1970s and early 1980s would often still involve large stretches of conventional roads; a hundred miles of Interstate, then a US highway for 50 miles while you saw highway construction, grading, or unopened ghost Interstate stretch out in the distance, then back onto the Interstate, then off again, and so on. The system in the not-so-distant past often seemed like US 101 in California today or US 15 in Pennsylvania 10 years ago.

In the late 1940s and early 1950s, there were state toll roads (the earliest was the Pennsylvania Turnpike, which opened in 1940), some of which were connected with the toll roads of other states. Many states had small limited-access toll roads through heavily trafficked corridors, for example US 36 between Denver and Boulder. Many states had planned tollway networks before the Interstate Highway system was announced in the 1950s; most connected with the planned or existing tollways in other states.

There were also limited-access parkway networks in some areas, such as Robert Moses's network in the NYC area, and the Arroyo Seco Parkway in Los Angeles. The earliest limited-access motor vehicle parkway in the US that I know of is the Rockefeller Parkway in Cleveland, which was built in the early 1900s. It's only two lanes, and entrances and exits are at 90 degree angles, but it was a true limited access road from the start, with no direct access to houses, businesses, or other roads.

A drive across the US on a road like US 66 or US 30 (the Lincolnway, as it's still called in many places today) wasn't like you were traversing some frontier trail. In many places, US 66 and US 30 were four lane divided highways. They just weren't limited access roads. There might be the occasional cloverleaf at a very busy suburban intersection. Lane marking would have been minimal; just the break lines in the concrete pads to distinguish the lanes in most areas. In rural areas, travel would be just a bit slower than an Interstate in the 55 MPH era; stops in small towns, driveways to farms and isolated houses, farm equipment on the roads, and tighter turns and steeper slopes than today's Interstates, but otherwise it wasn't as if you were in a horse and buggy.

Last edited by elmwood; 12-24-2009 at 11:35 AM..
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 12-24-2009, 11:36 AM
Airman Doors, USAF Airman Doors, USAF is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,015
Quote:
Originally Posted by md2000 View Post
I assume the problem - which the interstate system was meant to address - was that the turnpike-type roads were local and the voters who fudned them very parochial.
The Interstate system was actually intended to enable rapid movement of military materiel as well as high-speed transportation. It was never intended to address any sort of "parochialism".

Quote:
It's a chicken-and-egg scenario. What came first, the traffic or the roads?
The roads.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-24-2009, 11:43 AM
blondebear blondebear is online now
Shouting Grasshopper
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Meridian/280
Posts: 10,168
Quote:
Originally Posted by IAmNotSpartacus View Post
It didn't pass through "all the small towns," and many of those towns sprung up because of the highway, so you are suggesting some self-fulfilling prophecy that's a non-starter at best.
When Route 66 was being planned, many towns lobbied to be on the chosen route. The competition was pretty intense. Afterwards, others formed to take advantage of the built-in business opportunities.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 12-24-2009, 12:00 PM
Shagnasty Shagnasty is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 21,829
Route 24 in Southeastern Massachusetts is really similar to an interstate highway but it isn't a real one and it predates the U.S. interstate highway system. It has entrance and exit ramps and even rest stops.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 12-24-2009, 12:05 PM
elmwood elmwood is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Upstate New York
Posts: 9,249
Quote:
Originally Posted by md2000 View Post
I assume the problem - which the interstate system was meant to address - was that the turnpike-type roads were local and the voters who fudned them very parochial. There was no incentive for New York to fund a fancy highway from Buffalo toward Cleveland to the border, or toward Boston. Similarly - did the Pennsylvania Turnpike stop at Pittsburgh or carry on to the Ohio border?

In the remote states, was there the traffic or money to build decent roads for people just passing thorugh? Nobody wanted the highway to bypass their town and businesses, until the road traffic became too heavy and annoying.

It's a chicken-and-egg scenario. What came first, the traffic or the roads?
The traffic. Traffic on American roads in the 1930s was horrible. Automobile ownership was increasing despite the Depression, streetcar systems were slowly being dismantled, roads had no lane markings, traffic signals weren't timed, there were no left turn arrows or right-on-red laws, there were no access management policies (dictating the placement of driveways and cross streets), and contemporary suburban strip development (in the 1920s with speculative "taxpayer strips", and later in the form of exurban ice cream stands, hot dog stands, outdoor dance clubs, patio bars, miniature kiddie amusement parks, and oversized farmer's stand/supermarket hybrid stores) was getting its start. Induced demand scenarios would come decades later.

Many of the 1940s-1950s era turnpikes were part of statewide turnpike or toll road authorities. Even spurs, like the Niagara Thruway (I-190) in Buffalo, were built and operated by the New York Thruway Authority.

There were intergovernmental agreements to connect the various toll road networks, and planning for the early toll roads was performed in cooperation with other states. Toll roads were planned for Texas and Missouri; they would have connected with the roll roads in Oklahoma, Kansas and Illinois,ultimately allowing a driver from Boston to travel to Houston or San Antonio on a continuous, interconnected network of state toll roads.

Another example: when Pennsylvania planned their toll road, it was intended to serve traffic between Pittsburgh and Philadelphia. Ohio planned a toll road to stretch from the Pennsylvania state line to the Indiana border. Routing for the road was planned in conjunction with toll road authorities in Indiana and Pennsylvania; Pennsylvania would expand the Turnpike to meet the Ohio Turnpike, and Indiana would have the eastern terminus of the Indiana Toll Road meet the western terminus of the Ohio Turnpike.

Another toll road, Ohio 1, was planned to connect Cincinnati, Columbus, Cleveland and Ashtabula. I-90 through Pennsylvania was originally going to be part of the Pennsylvania Turnpike network, connecting the far western terminus of the New York Thruway with the eastern terminus of the Ohio 1 toll road in Conneaut.

md2000 states there was no incentive to build regional toll road networks, but there actually was: the revenue from interstate traffic, and the prospect of economic development resulting with improved accessibility tot he national transportation network. The early toll road systems were intended to connect cities more so than areas within cities. The New York State Thruway is evidence of this early road planning policy; it skirts around what was then the urbanized edges of Buffalo, Rochester, and Syracuse. Only later were spurs built to serve intra-city traffic.

Last edited by elmwood; 12-24-2009 at 12:09 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 12-24-2009, 01:48 PM
Exapno Mapcase Exapno Mapcase is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: NY but not NYC
Posts: 22,839
Quote:
Originally Posted by IAmNotSpartacus View Post
It didn't pass through "all the small towns," and many of those towns sprung up because of the highway, so you are suggesting some self-fulfilling prophecy that's a non-starter at best.
Cite for this? I'd like to know which towns sprang up after Route 66 went through. There may be some but only an insignificant percentage.

Quote:
One would hope that it would go without saying that a long distance highway is necessarily and inherently going to need to have towns on it, for gasoline and lodging and meals and so forth.
It's not even remotely true. Take the New York State Thruway. The point of the road was that you never had to go through a town. Service areas are spotted around ever 30-40 miles so that you never have to get off to get gas or meals. Of course there are exits to all major cities and you have to leave for overnight stays, but that's a wholly different matter. It's also a toll road. Most of the early thruways were tolled (Pennsylvania is another example) and the point was that you needn't need to leave for services once you got on. It was only after the Interstate system that free highways became common.

Quote:
I think I am confused. Route 66 doesn't fit because it went through small towns. But you say if someone wants to take a highway to get somewhere, they are going to find small towns.
No, I said that before Interstates most coast to coast highways went through towns. That's no longer true. You can travel coast to coast without ever having to slow down.

Quote:
Are you suggesting the early highways started and terminated out in the boonies? Highways, by definition, are designed to get someone from Point A to Point B. What good is a highway if it doesn't go anywhere?

Can you cite me some of these rural highways that were small and local and not interconnected and did not pass through small towns?
Read cjepson's post. Those are the small, local limited-access highways before the Interstate system. None of them connect major cities. Few even went across state lines. They were built to alleviate traffic on local roads to get people out of major cities to the far reaches of the metro areas rather than as city-to-city connector spans as today.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 12-24-2009, 03:32 PM
suranyi suranyi is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 6,345
Quote:
Originally Posted by IAmNotSpartacus View Post
It didn't pass through "all the small towns," and many of those towns sprung up because of the highway, so you are suggesting some self-fulfilling prophecy that's a non-starter at best. One would hope that it would go without saying that a long distance highway is necessarily and inherently going to need to have towns on it, for gasoline and lodging and meals and so forth.

Of course, what's also interesting is that many of those towns on Route 66 have been long abandoned, replaced by other towns that sprung up once the interstates were built. Curiously, one still finds towns on the interstates and the major economies are taking care of travelers.. food, lodging, fuel etc. It's not coincidental.

I think I am confused. Route 66 doesn't fit because it went through small towns. But you say if someone wants to take a highway to get somewhere, they are going to find small towns.

Are you suggesting the early highways started and terminated out in the boonies? Highways, by definition, are designed to get someone from Point A to Point B. What good is a highway if it doesn't go anywhere?


Can you cite me some of these rural highways that were small and local and not interconnected and did not pass through small towns?


The OP asked about "limited access" roads. That's why Route 66 doesn't fit.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 12-24-2009, 05:04 PM
Voyager Voyager is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Deep Space
Posts: 33,433
Quote:
Originally Posted by md2000 View Post
I assume the problem - which the interstate system was meant to address - was that the turnpike-type roads were local and the voters who fudned them very parochial. There was no incentive for New York to fund a fancy highway from Buffalo toward Cleveland to the border, or toward Boston. Similarly - did the Pennsylvania Turnpike stop at Pittsburgh or carry on to the Ohio border?
Driving from New York to visit relatives in Detroit and DC, I was on the Turnpikes in the late '50s, early '60s. I'm pretty sure the Pennsylvania Turnpike went right through. I also vaguely remember taking US 1 from New York to DC and it taking forever. When I lived near it in Princeton it was limited access, but in one of the
Fudge books Judy Blume has him walking through the Harrison Street circle, which would have been suicide when I lived there.

As for the cities on the roads question, I wonder what the percentage of long haul traffic was before the Interstates. I suspect it was much lower than today, since a trip would take a lot longer even on the Route 66 or US 1 type roads. Thus, the roads would have been designed for relatively short city to city traffic, not the model of the interstates which connected across states and were meant to move traffic through quickly.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 12-24-2009, 05:17 PM
OldGuy OldGuy is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Very east of Foggybog, WI
Posts: 2,568
The Ohio Turnpike and Indiana Toll Road predate the Interstate system. They connected to each other at the Ohio-Indiana state line and the Ohio turnpike connected to the Pennsylvania Turnpike so one could drive across all three states without cross traffic or stop lights. I never drove the PA turnpike east past Philadelphia so I'm not sure what it connected to at that end. There was also a NorthEast extension on the Pennsylvania turnpike, but I don't know when that dates from.

I'm pretty sure the Massachusetts turnpike and the New York Thruway predate the interstate system and connected together much as they do now.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 12-24-2009, 05:43 PM
Bijou Drains Bijou Drains is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Blue Ridge parkway is a very scenic 2 lane road that does not allow trucks or any commercial vehicles. The speed limit is 45. About 95% was finished by WW II, a small section was completed in 1987 because it took a very long time for 1 landowner to give permission for it to be built near his land. They built this viaduct to get his OK.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linn_Cove_Viaduct
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 12-25-2009, 11:10 AM
Markxxx Markxxx is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Chicago,IL
Posts: 14,962
Here's a good site for those who find the history of roads interesting called Road Fan (Dot) Com

You can also try Misc.Road.Transport if you have access to usenet or through Google Groups.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 12-25-2009, 11:17 AM
Freddy the Pig Freddy the Pig is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Quote:
Originally Posted by Polycarp
So my question is, before the late 1950s when the Interstate system was being put in place, what was available in the way of limited-access highways? Where could one travel between without having to slow down for the metropolises of Prairie Dog Corners and Resume Speed?
As is emerging from the many responses, by the late 1950's you could drive limited-access through most of the Midwest/Northeast corridor, roughly from Chicago to the Northeast. Roads were either under construction or on the drawing board in the farm states.

Beyond that, in the deep South or the intermountain west, good luck. The problem, of course, is that states with the wide open spaces had more miles to cover and less of a tax base to cover them with. And of course, the deep South was still poor at this time.

This was a rerun of the situation with respect to paved highways circa 1920, as chronicled in the book American Road--decent roads as far west as Chicago, and crap after that.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 12-25-2009, 11:20 AM
smiling bandit smiling bandit is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Quote:
Originally Posted by Airman Doors, USAF View Post
The Interstate system was actually intended to enable rapid movement of military materiel as well as high-speed transportation. It was never intended to address any sort of "parochialism".
I can't perfectly agree there. The very fact that it was needed was because of the lack of national-scale transportation infrastructure. I wouldn't exactly say parochialism, myself, but the absense of long-distance high-speed trnsit corridors to move people acorss the nation was certainly viewed as a weakness.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 12-25-2009, 11:49 AM
elmwood elmwood is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Upstate New York
Posts: 9,249
A correction for one of my posts: Missouri never planned toll roads, and the planned systems of Oklahoma and Texas never linked up.

http://www.ajfroggie.com/roads/yello...roads-1955.jpg

For those wondering what limited access highways were around in the good 'ol days, check the link above.

Last edited by elmwood; 12-25-2009 at 11:51 AM..
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 12-25-2009, 11:59 AM
Exapno Mapcase Exapno Mapcase is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: NY but not NYC
Posts: 22,839
Quote:
Originally Posted by Airman Doors, USAF View Post
The Interstate system was actually intended to enable rapid movement of military materiel as well as high-speed transportation. It was never intended to address any sort of "parochialism".
This is sort of an urban legend. It's true that when Eisenhower was young he participated in a famous military exercise, the Transcontinental Motor Convoy in 1919 that showed how bad the roads were in America. And he did appreciate the autobahn system in Germany.

But he came late to the party, as so many of the posts in this thread have shown. By the mid-1950s it was obvious to most Americans, and an article of faith to traffic designers, that the way to transport cars was to avoid the need to have them slow down and pass through city streets, whether in big cities or small towns. This was believed true not just for interstate travel but for the increasing suburban commuter traffic that funneled people into city centers. City streets were clogged past capacity almost everywhere.

However, the politics of the system were such that cities got a much smaller proportional share of Interstate funds than were their due. Most of the early funding allocations went to rural areas, where traffic needs were less but those in Congress were powerful. The intricate city beltways and loops were more a product of the 60s and after.

None of this was intended in any way to support military travel. It may have sounded good as a reason to spend money in the beginning, but it was no more than a sound bite for public consumption. The system was put into place for cars and trucks, not military vehicles, and nobody, including those in the military, ever seriously professed otherwise.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 12-25-2009, 01:00 PM
jasg jasg is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Upper left hand corner
Posts: 2,843
Quote:
Originally Posted by Exapno Mapcase View Post
This is sort of an urban legend. It's true that when Eisenhower was young he participated in a famous military exercise, the Transcontinental Motor Convoy in 1919 that showed how bad the roads were in America. And he did appreciate the autobahn system in Germany.
A couple of years ago I read an interesting book, American Road, about this trip. I recommend it if you are interested in this subject. On a personal note, I was fascinated with the speed at which automobile travel improved - just 20 years after the military convoy that took months (and travelled with their own tow trucks), two of my widowed great-aunts did it on their own in a 1937 Chevy.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 12-25-2009, 01:08 PM
aceplace57 aceplace57 is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
The Overseas Highway (U.S. Highway 1) that goes out to the Florida keys was built in the 1930's. One of the longest bridges when it was built, the Seven Mile Bridge connects Knight's Key (part of the city of Marathon in the Middle Keys) to Little Duck Key in the Lower Keys.

Incredible engineering feat that cost 200 Veterans their lives.

Quote:
In 1935, new bridges were under construction to connect a highway through the entire Keys. Hundreds of World War I veterans working on the roadway as part of a government relief program were housed in non-reinforced buildings in three construction camps in the Upper Keys. When the evacuation train failed to reach the camps before the storm, more than 200 veterans perished. Their deaths caused anger and charges of mismanagement that led to a Congressional investigation.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 12-25-2009, 01:42 PM
Polycarp Polycarp is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: A better place to be
Posts: 26,718
Quote:
Originally Posted by Exapno Mapcase View Post
None of this was intended in any way to support military travel. It may have sounded good as a reason to spend money in the beginning, but it was no more than a sound bite for public consumption. The system was put into place for cars and trucks, not military vehicles, and nobody, including those in the military, ever seriously professed otherwise.
I would beg to differ. One of the principal initial reasons given for the Interstate Highway network was its value in transporting convoys and miliary materiel rapidly from place to place across the country. This also helped justify it to the strict constitutionalists of the time, as being valuable to the national defense. By law, military convoys have, or at least once had (not sure if it's still in effect), the right-of-way over all other traffic save emergency vehicles on any highway funded by the Interstate system.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 12-25-2009, 02:52 PM
DrDeth DrDeth is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: San Jose
Posts: 21,995
The lyrics to the famous song mention (wiki) "The lyrics read as a mini-travelogue about the major stops along the route, listing several cities and towns that Route 66 passes through, viz. St. Louis, Missouri; Joplin, Missouri; Oklahoma City, Oklahoma; Amarillo, Texas; Gallup, New Mexico; Flagstaff, Arizona; Winona, Arizona; Kingman, Arizona; Barstow, California; and San Bernardino, California. Winona is the only town out of sequence: it was a very small settlement east of Flagstaff, and might indeed have been forgotten if not for the lyric "Don't forget Winona," written to rhyme with "Flagstaff, Arizona."

None of those (we'll exclude Winona as it was just there to rhyme) " towns sprung up because of the highway". Gallup, Barstow, Flagstaff, Kingman, all were railroad towns.

Oatman AZ might count, except it was a mining town too. Grants NM is close, but it started as a RR town. Glenario NM/TX was a tiny burg that pretty much rose and fell with Rte 66.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 12-25-2009, 07:58 PM
Exapno Mapcase Exapno Mapcase is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: NY but not NYC
Posts: 22,839
Quote:
Originally Posted by Polycarp View Post
I would beg to differ. One of the principal initial reasons given for the Interstate Highway network was its value in transporting convoys and miliary materiel rapidly from place to place across the country. This also helped justify it to the strict constitutionalists of the time, as being valuable to the national defense. By law, military convoys have, or at least once had (not sure if it's still in effect), the right-of-way over all other traffic save emergency vehicles on any highway funded by the Interstate system.
I don't see how this differs from what I wrote. The key is your word "initial". I would need cites that said that once the network started being built traffic engineers cared about military convoys. Or that even the military cared about military convoys. The Interstate had its own logic and once people got a taste of it they didn't need more justification.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 12-27-2009, 05:13 PM
Polycarp Polycarp is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: A better place to be
Posts: 26,718
By the way, thanks to all who provided responses here -- they've been very interesting.

I do know that during the Cold War, convoys headed for Fort Drum (which was the major East Coast reserve-training facility, AFAIK) were said to have priority in the use of I-81. And that the original bill made reference to National Defense in the title and intent. Beyod that, I've got nothing.
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 12-27-2009, 07:13 PM
Ignatz Ignatz is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
There was the Newburyport Turnpike north out of Boston that was upgraded with grade-separated interchanges in 1937.

http://www.wickedlocal.com/saugus/to...ry/x1649539967

The Bronx River parkway was limited to passenger cars only and had cross traffic eliminated in 1924 (Wixom, Charles W., ARBQ Pictorial History of Roadbuilding, 1975)

Planning for the controlled-access Merritt Parkway in CT began in the 1920s (ibid). The Pasadena (Arroyo Seco) Freeway was started in 1940. (ibid).

The Pennsylvania Tpke opened in 1940, partially on the route of an abandonded railway line that was never built. (ibid)

The U.S. Interstate System, now officially named the Dwight D. Eisenhower System of Interstate and DEFENSE Highways, (my CAPS) was conceived by President F. D. Roosevelt in 1944 and became a reality in 1956. Its design standards to this day allow for the transportation of missiles by trucks, under bridges that must have at least one route through a city with at least 16 feet of vertical clearance. Its originally planned routing was to connect cities of 50,000 or more population and major military bases/establishments.

http://www.answers.com/topic/interst...system#History
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 12-27-2009, 09:46 PM
Fear Itself Fear Itself is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: 847 mi. from Cecil
Posts: 28,273
Arroyo Seco Parkway (now the 110 Pasadena Freeway) between Pasadena and Los Angeles opened in 1940 with limited access (PDF):
Quote:
The Arroyo Seco Parkway (Pasadena Freeway) was the first divided-lane, high-speed, limited-access road in the urban western United States and the first stretch of road for what would become the extensive Los Angeles freeway network. The approximately six-mile initial stage of the 8.2-mile roadway, completed in 1940, was envisioned as both a scenic road traversing the Arroyo and a vital traffic conduit linking the expanding cities of Pasadena and Los Angeles. Engineers and planners attempted to blend landscaping and native plants into the overall design while implementing safety features appropriate for high-speed travel.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 12-28-2009, 08:30 AM
dasgupta dasgupta is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
The Vanderbilt Parkway (or as Wiki calls it, the Long Island Motor Parkway) opened in 1908 and claims to be the first roadway designed exclusively for automobiles as well as the first to use overpasses to eliminate intersections.

However, as the article explains, you could turn left across oncoming traffic, so while it was limited access it wasn't entirely what we think of as a superhighway.

And to be fair, it was closed in 1938, prior to the date in the OP.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Send questions for Cecil Adams to: cecil@chicagoreader.com

Send comments about this website to: webmaster@straightdope.com

Terms of Use / Privacy Policy

Advertise on the Straight Dope!
(Your direct line to thousands of the smartest, hippest people on the planet, plus a few total dipsticks.)

Publishers - interested in subscribing to the Straight Dope?
Write to: sdsubscriptions@chicagoreader.com.

Copyright 2013 Sun-Times Media, LLC.