The Straight Dope

Go Back   Straight Dope Message Board > Main > General Questions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #101  
Old 06-27-2012, 08:31 PM
bengangmo bengangmo is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by MarcusF View Post
DC3s on the transatlantic route? When was that? I wouldn't have thought they had the range.
I'm not good with geoography, and this was aound 8 years ago so my memory is hazy to say the least. I think that it was Hong Kong to Australia and Hong Kong to England I think - the trip was done over multiple days with many stop-overs.
Reply With Quote
Advertisements  
  #102  
Old 06-28-2012, 05:51 AM
Martini Enfield Martini Enfield is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Quote:
Originally Posted by MarcusF View Post
DC3s on the transatlantic route? When was that? I wouldn't have thought they had the range.
I'm pretty sure they did; but it'd be "Transatlantic from somewhere like Nova Scotia via Greenland and/or Iceland," as opposed to a non-stop flight.

There was a documentary on SBS a few months ago about the RAF ferry pilots who had to get aircraft from Canada to the UK that way (IIRC they were flying Bristol Beauforts or something like that), so it was certainly doable in a DC-3.
Reply With Quote
  #103  
Old 06-28-2012, 07:15 AM
Orionizer Orionizer is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by t-bonham@scc.net View Post
I can't see that being feasible, for something the size of the Hindenburg. Heated air provides much less lift than H or He, so you would need a much, much larger 'balloon'. Looking at hot air balloons, it seems like you need several times the volume of balloon vs. payload. Seems like it would take a really big balloon!

Then there is the cost of heating the air. Buoyant H or He stays buoyant; air must be kept hot to remain buoyant. That requires fairly frequent heating, possibly even continuous at higher altitudes. The cost of the natural gas (or other fuel) to keep the air heated would be pretty high. As well as the weight & space occupied by this fuel.

I don't see this as being cost effective.
I shoulda known this would have been a stupid question... Thanks!
Reply With Quote
  #104  
Old 08-10-2012, 11:36 PM
Elendil's Heir Elendil's Heir is offline
SDSAB
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Diogenes Club
Posts: 38,576
The U.S. Army has three new big blimps: http://security.blogs.cnn.com/2012/0...ght/?hpt=hp_c2
Reply With Quote
  #105  
Old 08-10-2012, 11:46 PM
Maserschmidt Maserschmidt is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 2,729
Beware of wind turbines at night.
Reply With Quote
  #106  
Old 08-12-2012, 10:59 AM
Lust4Life Lust4Life is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
I'd happily pay for an aerial cruise.

Perhaps over the Amazon jungle, or the African savannah.

I think that many more would do so as well.

I've never understood the mindset of people who go on sea cruises in an environment where they might as well be on a land resort
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:55 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Send questions for Cecil Adams to: cecil@chicagoreader.com

Send comments about this website to: webmaster@straightdope.com

Terms of Use / Privacy Policy

Advertise on the Straight Dope!
(Your direct line to thousands of the smartest, hippest people on the planet, plus a few total dipsticks.)

Publishers - interested in subscribing to the Straight Dope?
Write to: sdsubscriptions@chicagoreader.com.

Copyright © 2013 Sun-Times Media, LLC.