Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-23-2017, 11:14 AM
beowulff beowulff is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Scottsdale, more-or-less
Posts: 14,964
Medical diagnostics q - Ultrasound

I had an Echo / Stress Echo and Carotid scan yesterday. Happily, the preliminary results looked good (although, it's still unclear why my Cardiologist heard a "bruit" in my left Carotid). My question is: if an Ultrasound scan can give a decent image in regards to the artery diameter, why isn't this used all the time to detect coronary artery blockages, instead of an Angiogram, which is a much more invasive and dangerous procedure?
  #2  
Old 11-23-2017, 11:54 AM
Shmendrik Shmendrik is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,554
The carotid is a nice big structure relatively close to the surface with out many major structures in between to block the ultrasound. The length of carotid which needs to be seen is also relatively short. By contrast, the coronaries are long arteries, deep in the chest, sheltered by bone, muscle, and the heart itself, depending which ones you are looking at and from which direction. Unlike the carotid which is essentially running in one plane, each coronary wraps around the heart in various directions, and they move as the heart does. Even a basic echocardiogram like the one you had can have difficulty determining the sizes of the (comparatively huge) ventricles and details about the heart valves due to some of the above technical factors, so you can imagine that accurately imaging the coronaries would be very difficult.
  #3  
Old 11-23-2017, 12:24 PM
beowulff beowulff is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Scottsdale, more-or-less
Posts: 14,964
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shmendrik View Post
The carotid is a nice big structure relatively close to the surface with out many major structures in between to block the ultrasound. The length of carotid which needs to be seen is also relatively short. By contrast, the coronaries are long arteries, deep in the chest, sheltered by bone, muscle, and the heart itself, depending which ones you are looking at and from which direction. Unlike the carotid which is essentially running in one plane, each coronary wraps around the heart in various directions, and they move as the heart does. Even a basic echocardiogram like the one you had can have difficulty determining the sizes of the (comparatively huge) ventricles and details about the heart valves due to some of the above technical factors, so you can imagine that accurately imaging the coronaries would be very difficult.
I can see where that would make imaging difficult, but it seems like all those issues could be solved my technology (time-of-flight gating, for example) and computing power. Is research being done to make coronary artery ultrasound imaging practical? It would be yuge! Yuge I say!
  #4  
Old 11-23-2017, 01:40 PM
Qadgop the Mercotan Qadgop the Mercotan is online now
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Slithering on the hull
Posts: 25,759
Quote:
Originally Posted by beowulff View Post
I can see where that would make imaging difficult, but it seems like all those issues could be solved my technology (time-of-flight gating, for example) and computing power. Is research being done to make coronary artery ultrasound imaging practical? It would be yuge! Yuge I say!
I'm far removed from the cutting edge of medical imaging technology, but back in the day I was taught that sound waves could only be enhanced so far before you just couldn't squeeze any more consistently reliable information out of them. Hence the gold standards for such testing remain the optical images you get from such procedures as catheterization.
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:43 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Send questions for Cecil Adams to: cecil@chicagoreader.com

Send comments about this website to: webmaster@straightdope.com

Terms of Use / Privacy Policy

Advertise on the Straight Dope!
(Your direct line to thousands of the smartest, hippest people on the planet, plus a few total dipsticks.)

Publishers - interested in subscribing to the Straight Dope?
Write to: sdsubscriptions@chicagoreader.com.

Copyright 2017 Sun-Times Media, LLC.

 
Copyright © 2017