Plural of acronym ending in "S"?

[CookingWithGas]

Do you just add an "s" or do you add "es" like it would be pronounced?

CMSs

CMSes

?

[Leaffan]

Just s. And definitely no apostrophe!

[CookingWithGas]

Correct use of the apostrophe is a religion with me.

[Gary T]

Originally Posted by Leaffan

Just s. And definitely no apostrophe!

Not being snarky, but sincerely -- says who? I was taught explicitly that abbreviations (e.g. "TV") were the one case where the plural was indeed formed with "apostrophe S." There is such a thing as a TVS, and if only upper case letters are being used that apostrophe is necessary to distinguish between TVS (singular) and TV'S (plural).

[flight]

Originally Posted by Gary T

Not being snarky, but sincerely -- says who? I was taught explicitly that abbreviations (e.g. "TV") were the one case where the plural was indeed formed with "apostrophe S." There is such a thing as a TVS, and if only upper case letters are being used that apostrophe is necessary to distinguish between TVS (singular) and TV'S (plural).

Not only has every style guide I have seen said not to include an apostrophe, but why on Earth would you be capitalizing the S that makes the abbreviation plural in the first place?

[flight]

Missed the edit window. I just did a search through several online style guides and they all seem to agree with what I stated above. Here is an example:

http://www.osu.edu/resources/styleguide.html

Originally Posted by Ohio State University Style Guide

apostrophes

Make abbreviations plural by adding “s.”

MBAs, RNs, BAs, W-2s, IDs

No apostrophe is needed for decades.

1990s, 1980s

While there may be some group out there that recommends the use of apostrophes, I couldn't find them.

[Gary T]

Originally Posted by flight

Not only has every style guide I have seen said not to include an apostrophe, but why on Earth would you be capitalizing the S that makes the abbreviation plural in the first place?

What I underlined there. Surely you've seen signs and advertisements that use only upper case letters?

Nevertheless, it appears what I remember is not the norm nowadays.

[Bad Astronaut]

Originally Posted by flight

Missed the edit window. I just did a search through several online style guides and they all seem to agree with what I stated above. Here is an example:

http://www.osu.edu/resources/styleguide.html

While there may be some group out there that recommends the use of apostrophes, I couldn't find them.

Off-topic: isn't it a little troubling that the style guide contains such an obvious grammatical error ('is needed' instead of 'has been needed')? The way it's written implies that your plural abbreviations will last several decades with no apostrophes, but apostrophes will eventually need to be added.

[Fear the Turtle]

So how do you differentiate between Ps (multiple occurences of the letter "P") and Ps (Static Pressure)? Or any case where adding an 's' creates a different abreviation/acronym?

[SciFiSam]

Originally Posted by flight

Missed the edit window. I just did a search through several online style guides and they all seem to agree with what I stated above. Here is an example:

http://www.osu.edu/resources/styleguide.html

While there may be some group out there that recommends the use of apostrophes, I couldn't find them.

Until about 25 years ago, it was commonplace for style guides to say that you add an apostrophe when pluralising acronyms. I can't find any current online cites for that, but I have read it in many places.

Originally Posted by Bad Astronaut

Off-topic: isn't it a little troubling that the style guide contains such an obvious grammatical error ('is needed' instead of 'has been needed')? The way it's written implies that your plural abbreviations will last several decades with no apostrophes, but apostrophes will eventually need to be added.

What? No, 'is needed' is absolutely correct. You use the present simple tense for rules and 'things which are always true.' 'Is needed' is the passive voice version of present simple; it's often used for rules.

'Has been needed' would make it sound like you were talking about the past up to and including the present, but not necessarily into the future. It would most often be used for comparisons between the recent, continuous past and the present: 'this development has been needed for a long time, so we're relieved it's finally here.'

[Bad Astronaut]

Originally Posted by scifisam2009

What? No, 'is needed' is absolutely correct. You use the present simple tense for rules and 'things which are always true.' 'Is needed' is the passive voice version of present simple; it's often used for rules.

'Has been needed' would make it sound like you were talking about the past up to and including the present, but not necessarily into the future. It would most often be used for comparisons between the recent, continuous past and the present: 'this development has been needed for a long time, so we're relieved it's finally here.'

'Is needed' would be fine of course, but 'is needed for decades' is nonsense. The closest meaning I can figure out is the one I mentioned.

[SciFiSam]

Originally Posted by Fear the Turtle

So how do you differentiate between Ps (multiple occurences of the letter "P") and Ps (Static Pressure)? Or any case where adding an 's' creates a different abreviation/acronym?

Context. P's (possessive) and P's (plural) could also create confusion - not very likely, but neither is your example.

Taking apostrophes out of acronyms does mean that there are some potential ambiguities, but it does get rid of other potential ambiguities, and at least it means that all non-possessive plurals are now supposed to be unapostrophised, which should, theoretically, be easier for people to remember.

[SciFiSam]

Originally Posted by Bad Astronaut

'Is needed' would be fine of course, but 'is needed for decades' is nonsense. The closest meaning I can figure out is the one I mentioned.

I see where you've gone wrong there: they're not saying that apostrophes have been needed for a really long time, they're saying that apostrophes are needed for words which are decades, written in numerical format.

[qpw3141]

Quite honestly, I don't give a flying fuck what the style guides say.

I was taught to add an apostrophe and a lower case 's'. It is backed up by a certain amount of logic, looks good to me, and I'm sticking with it.

That and the Oxford comma in lists.

[Bad Astronaut]

Originally Posted by scifisam2009

I see where you've gone wrong there: they're not saying that apostrophes have been needed for a really long time, they're saying that apostrophes are needed for words which are decades, written in numerical format.

Heh, now I see it. I should have looked a little more closely.

[CookingWithGas]

Originally Posted by Fear the Turtle

So how do you differentiate between Ps (multiple occurences of the letter "P") and Ps (Static Pressure)? Or any case where adding an 's' creates a different abreviation/acronym?

I used to work for CSC, which is a large IT consulting company (90K employees). I had a copy of their technical writing style guide and it said do not use an apostrophe for plurals unless it would create an ambiguity, as in exactly this type of case.

The following is a made-up example but illustrates the point. I could not quickly come up with a real standard or product number ending in a lowercase "s" so I made one up:

When configuring the network and selecting connectors, use either five R2P's or a single R2Ps.

(BTW is it Ps or P_s?)

Originally Posted by qpw3141

Quite honestly, I don't give a flying fuck what the style guides say.

I was taught to add an apostrophe and a lower case 's'. It is backed up by a certain amount of logic, looks good to me, and I'm sticking with it.

Well you've certainly got a right to an opinion, though I don't see the logic in using an apostrophe to make acronyms plural when it is not used to make anything else plural.

[UDS]

Originally Posted by CookingWithGas

It’s hard to imagine that the difference between “multiple occurrences of the letter ‘P’” and “static pressure” wouldn’t be immediately obvious from the context.

Originally Posted by CookingWithGas

I used to work for CSC, which is a large IT consulting company (90K employees). I had a copy of their technical writing style guide and it said do not use an apostrophe for plurals unless it would create an ambiguity, as in exactly this type of case.

The following is a made-up example but illustrates the point. I could not quickly come up with a real standard or product number ending in a lowercase "s" so I made one up:

When configuring the network and selecting connectors, use either five R2P's or a single R2Ps.

See, there you go. “Five R2Ps” has to be plural, and “a single R2Ps” has to be singular. No need for any apostrophe.

[CookingWithGas]

Originally Posted by UDS

See, there you go. “Five R2Ps” has to be plural, and “a single R2Ps” has to be singular. No need for any apostrophe.

Well, shit, since I'm making stuff up, how about this:

When configuring the network and selecting connectors, use either five R2P's or one R2P combined with one R2Ps.

I guess you could argue it still doesn't need the apostrophe, but without it, people are going to blink.

[SciFiSam]

Originally Posted by CookingWithGas

Well, shit, since I'm making stuff up, how about this:

When configuring the network and selecting connectors, use either five R2P's or one R2P combined with one R2Ps.

I guess you could argue it still doesn't need the apostrophe, but without it, people are going to blink.

I see what you mean, but you could make the same stuff up where people would be momentarily confused as to whether it was a plural R2P's or possessive singular R2P's. You'd have to rephrase either way.

There needs to be a rule about when to use the apostrophe, and it's simpler to say 'don't use an apostrophe to show pluralisation' rather than have exceptions which lots of people would get even more wrong: 'oh, if that's an exception, then that might be too...'