The Straight Dope

Go Back   Straight Dope Message Board > Main > Cafe Society

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51  
Old 04-14-2003, 02:50 PM
Spectre of Pithecanthropus Spectre of Pithecanthropus is offline
Charter Member
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Marmite Free Sector
Posts: 18,605
His Sun Sessions material is absolutely legendary rock'n'roll. I normally do prefer the original R&B recordings over white artists' cover recordings. But while giving Wynonie Harris, Big Mama Thornton, and Arthur Crudup props for being the originators, what Elvis and his boys did with their songs just sends chills down my spine.
Reply With Quote
Advertisements  
  #52  
Old 04-15-2003, 07:21 AM
Scumpup Scumpup is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Elvis had charisma. Charisma is a thing rooted in time and context. The films and recordings don't convey much but a hint of that magnetism. If you weren't there, you probably won't ever understand it.
Think of it in these terms: When you watch old newsreels, do FDR and Hitler seem like particularly charismatic guys? To the people of their time and place, they were.
ps Elvis was also genuinely a very talented performer. He can hang with any of the great musical performers, no question about it.
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 04-15-2003, 06:50 PM
PunditLisa PunditLisa is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: 'burbs of Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 13,960
Quote:
Which songs did ANYone else do better than he?
Love Elvis to pieces, but Simon & Garfunkel OWN "Bridge Over Troubled Water." I've yet to hear one person or group that could sing it better.
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old 06-19-2017, 03:57 PM
forreal7 forreal7 is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
are you serious?

that's an insult. how can you compare him to madonna? unlike most singers today, elvis was a straight, talented, soulful and respectable singer who deeply believed in God. He didn't cross dress, sing like a girl such as prince or perform homosexual and sacriligious acts like madonna. Elvis was the King of rock 'n' roll. today's musicians are disgusting. singers like elvis, would wear the best suits and ties and the women were always well-dressed. now it's all about body piercings, tattoos, sex, drugs, and sexual perversion.



Quote:
Originally Posted by Mockingbird View Post
He was the first to be a charismatic white rock and roll singer.

He was the Madonna of his time, without longevity.

Remember: his career ended with him being a bloated joke, sorta like Delta Burke, but less attractive.
Reply With Quote
  #55  
Old 06-19-2017, 04:16 PM
running coach running coach is online now
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Riding my handcycle
Posts: 30,136
Quote:
Originally Posted by forreal7 View Post
that's an insult. how can you compare him to madonna? unlike most singers today, elvis was a straight, talented, soulful and respectable singer who deeply believed in God. He didn't cross dress, sing like a girl such as prince or perform homosexual and sacriligious acts like madonna. Elvis was the King of rock 'n' roll. today's musicians are disgusting. singers like elvis, would wear the best suits and ties and the women were always well-dressed. now it's all about body piercings, tattoos, sex, drugs, and sexual perversion.
This thread is 14 years old, Mockingbird hasn't posted here since 2006.
Capitals can be your friend.

Last edited by running coach; 06-19-2017 at 04:16 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #56  
Old 06-19-2017, 04:18 PM
naita naita is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
I'd like to hear from a higher ranked "for real" than no. 7.
Reply With Quote
  #57  
Old 06-19-2017, 04:43 PM
TriPolar TriPolar is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by forreal7 View Post
that's an insult. how can you compare him to madonna? unlike most singers today, elvis was a straight, talented, soulful and respectable singer who deeply believed in God. He didn't cross dress, sing like a girl such as prince or perform homosexual and sacriligious acts like madonna. Elvis was the King of rock 'n' roll. today's musicians are disgusting. singers like elvis, would wear the best suits and ties and the women were always well-dressed. now it's all about body piercings, tattoos, sex, drugs, and sexual perversion.
And that has what to do with the music?
Reply With Quote
  #58  
Old 06-19-2017, 05:19 PM
lisiate lisiate is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Rhinestone encrusted jumpsuits were the best suits around in the 70s?
Reply With Quote
  #59  
Old 06-19-2017, 05:25 PM
Darren Garrison Darren Garrison is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Quote:
Originally Posted by running coach View Post
Capitals can be your friend.
I was once in a bowling league with Ulaanbaatar.
Reply With Quote
  #60  
Old 06-19-2017, 05:33 PM
snfaulkner snfaulkner is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: May 2015
Quote:
Originally Posted by forreal7 View Post
that's an insult. how can you compare him to madonna? unlike most singers today, elvis was a straight, talented, soulful and respectable singer who deeply believed in God. He didn't cross dress, sing like a girl such as prince or perform homosexual and sacriligious acts like madonna. Elvis was the King of rock 'n' roll. today's musicians are disgusting. singers like elvis, would wear the best suits and ties and the women were always well-dressed. now it's all about body piercings, tattoos, sex, drugs, and sexual perversion.
Are you not aware of the nickname Elvis the Pelvis? I'm not sure what you mean by "sacriligious acts" but he certainly played up the fucking motion to the teens...like Madonna.
Reply With Quote
  #61  
Old 06-19-2017, 06:04 PM
DMGuy DMGuy is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Quote:
Originally Posted by forreal7 View Post
that's an insult. how can you compare him to madonna? unlike most singers today, elvis was a straight, talented, soulful and respectable singer who deeply believed in God. He didn't cross dress, sing like a girl such as prince or perform homosexual and sacriligious acts like madonna. Elvis was the King of rock 'n' roll. today's musicians are disgusting. singers like elvis, would wear the best suits and ties and the women were always well-dressed. now it's all about body piercings, tattoos, sex, drugs, and sexual perversion.
In addition to reviving a zombie thread, you complete ignore the reaction to Elvis by the "older" generation at that time. He was accused of corrupting the youth and endangering American culture.
Reply With Quote
  #62  
Old 06-19-2017, 06:28 PM
Weisshund Weisshund is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Since elvis is probably sitting someplace incognito reading this thread, even after 14 years
I would just like to mention slightly pudgy spandex jumpsuited elvis could roll into Vegas broke and go home rich on an at will basis.

I imagine that kind of gives him the last laugh
Reply With Quote
  #63  
Old 06-19-2017, 08:27 PM
igor frankensteen igor frankensteen is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
I get that Elvis was a great artist. I don't get the Elvis religion, though. I'm just not a worshiping kind of fan. No matter how much I like or even love the performer.
Reply With Quote
  #64  
Old 06-19-2017, 10:39 PM
nearwildheaven nearwildheaven is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Quote:
Originally Posted by forreal7 View Post
that's an insult. how can you compare him to madonna? unlike most singers today, elvis was a straight, talented, soulful and respectable singer who deeply believed in God. He didn't cross dress, sing like a girl such as prince or perform homosexual and sacriligious acts like madonna. Elvis was the King of rock 'n' roll. today's musicians are disgusting. singers like elvis, would wear the best suits and ties and the women were always well-dressed. now it's all about body piercings, tattoos, sex, drugs, and sexual perversion.
He was apparently REEEEEALLY weird sexually. He was really hung up on his mother, to the point where he could not perform sexually with women who had given birth.

I realize that has nothing to do with how well he could sing, and unlike far too many modern performers, that WAS something he could do.

I had a friend who was a big fan of his, and actually met him and said he was as charismatic in real life, even based on that short meet & greet, as he was onstage.
Reply With Quote
  #65  
Old 06-20-2017, 01:13 AM
Joey P Joey P is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 26,268
Quote:
Originally Posted by nearwildheaven View Post
He was apparently REEEEEALLY weird sexually. He was really hung up on his mother, to the point where he could not perform sexually with women who had given birth.
That's not that weird. I don't know how common it is, but it's an actual thing. It's Freud's Madonna-Whore Complex.
I've never heard of Elvis having it so I have no idea of what the specifics were and I don't really know all the ins and outs of the complex, but it basically comes down to men (and I'm sure women) that can't have sex with people, such as mothers, but generally mother's of their children, either because they respect them too much to be attracted to them or they felt sex was degrading and couldn't bring themselves to degrade someone they respect that much. [Keeping in mind this was written something like a hundred years ago], this would tend to drive men to find sex outside their marriage with someone he didn't respect, like a whore.
Reply With Quote
  #66  
Old 06-20-2017, 10:03 AM
Enter the Flagon Enter the Flagon is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
I always understood why he was so popular, what confounded me was where the stupid nickname came from.

I mean, what the heck is a "Belvace"?
Reply With Quote
  #67  
Old 06-20-2017, 10:35 AM
snoe snoe is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
In honor of the zombie thread, I'm gonna plug Greil Marcus's Dead Elvis, which posits that Elvis was more powerful dead than alive. http://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog.p...=9780674194229
Reply With Quote
  #68  
Old 06-20-2017, 11:50 AM
Just Asking Questions Just Asking Questions is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
And, speaking of zombies, ain't nobody can battle undead soul-sucking Egyptian mummies like Elvis!
Reply With Quote
  #69  
Old 06-20-2017, 02:35 PM
Kimballkid Kimballkid is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
No, Elvis is not dead, he just went home.
Reply With Quote
  #70  
Old 06-20-2017, 04:05 PM
Joey P Joey P is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 26,268
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enter the Flagon View Post
I always understood why he was so popular, what confounded me was where the stupid nickname came from.

I mean, what the heck is a "Belvace"?
I've never heard that and casually googling "Belvace" and "belvis"(which would make more sense) isn't bringing up any hits that have anything to do with him.
Are you sure you weren't hearing pelvis?
Reply With Quote
  #71  
Old 06-20-2017, 06:28 PM
aceplace57 aceplace57 is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Elvis was a natural singer. A very powerful belter and interpreter of music. He felt the music and sang it.

He's a perfect example of someone who shouldn't take music lessons. Three years of vocal study would have stripped away all his natural talent. Everything that made him great. He would have been just another cookie cutter singer.

He admitted one time that he failed a music class in high school.

That just means he wouldn't sing the way the teacher expected.
http://www.musicianguide.com/feature...gh-School.html

Last edited by aceplace57; 06-20-2017 at 06:32 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #72  
Old 06-20-2017, 07:33 PM
RealityChuck RealityChuck is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Schenectady, NY, USA
Posts: 40,374
Since the thread was started, there was an interesting comment from Ian Whitcomb, a minor one-hit wonder in the UK during the British Invasion of the 60s who turned to journalism. His original impression of Elvis was the he was just imitating Dean Martin.

As soon as I heard it, I realized he was right. Elvis's ballads sound a lot like Martin, and his uptempo songs would the was Dino would have sounded like if he had done rock.

Elvis might have denied the connection and would have said he was trying to imitate Bing Crosby.
Reply With Quote
  #73  
Old 06-20-2017, 08:08 PM
kunilou kunilou is online now
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Posts: 21,704
Back in college I had a friend whose tastes in contemporary music ranged from Captain Beefheart to Frank Zappa. Rock and Roll singers were pretty much beneath contempt for him. But even he acknowledged Elvis Presley's charisma in Jailhouse Rock.
Reply With Quote
  #74  
Old 06-20-2017, 11:03 PM
Enter the Flagon Enter the Flagon is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Quote:
Originally Posted by RealityChuck
Elvis's ballads sound a lot like Martin, and his uptempo songs would the was Dino would have sounded like if he had done rock.

Elvis might have denied the connection and would have said he was trying to imitate Bing Crosby.
I could see that, and since Dean Martin was himself so heavily influenced by Bing Crosby, I won't call him a liar to his face if he does.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Joey P
I've never heard that and casually googling "Belvace" and "belvis"(which would make more sense) isn't bringing up any hits that have anything to do with him.
Are you sure you weren't hearing pelvis?
Oh, pelvis? I guess it could be; at least it rhymes. But in that case, why not Elvis the Vertebra, or Elvis the Mandible? Certainly you could think of more charismatic skeletal components than a pelvis.
Reply With Quote
  #75  
Old 06-20-2017, 11:09 PM
snfaulkner snfaulkner is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: May 2015
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enter the Flagon View Post
I could see that, and since Dean Martin was himself so heavily influenced by Bing Crosby, I won't call him a liar to his face if he does.




Oh, pelvis? I guess it could be; at least it rhymes. But in that case, why not Elvis the Vertebra, or Elvis the Mandible? Certainly you could think of more charismatic skeletal components than a pelvis.
But the pelvis has the sexy bits.
Reply With Quote
  #76  
Old 06-20-2017, 11:37 PM
Joey P Joey P is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 26,268
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enter the Flagon View Post
Oh, pelvis? I guess it could be; at least it rhymes. But in that case, why not Elvis the Vertebra, or Elvis the Mandible? Certainly you could think of more charismatic skeletal components than a pelvis.
Quote:
Originally Posted by snfaulkner View Post
But the pelvis has the sexy bits.
It rhymes is probably the main reason, but back in the day, it was catching peoples attention. While I've never looked into myself, I always hear that on certain shows (or maybe a specific prime time type show) they could only show him from the waist up.
Think about the music that the kids were listening to a the time and as well as the music that the parents were listening to, then go watch a live version of Hound Dog and you can see why they may not have been happy with his gyrating hips.

It's not that different than in the 80s/90s when Michael Jackson showed up. How often did we hear 'grabbing his crotch' when someone was talking about him or Madonna and all the heat she took on her Blonde Ambition tour.

No one would think anything of Elvis' dance moves now. MJ's 'grabbing his crotch' is practically standard and what Madonna did on that tour, while still racy, probably wouldn't draw a police presence, have her threatened with arrest and cause an international fuss (this in the days before the internet, as we know it).

So yeah, it might seem like something hardly noteworthy 70 years later, but it was a big deal then. Just like in 70 years we might not think anything of Justin ripping Janet's top off at the Superbowl.
Reply With Quote
  #77  
Old 06-22-2017, 12:30 AM
syncrolecyne syncrolecyne is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Elvis' "Sun records" from 1954-1956 are at the cornerstone of much later rock and roll. After that, the only Elvis music that does anything for me is from the 1969 "Memphis" sessions. There are a few gems here and there.

The fact that Elvis wrote no songs was less of an issue in the era before Bob Dylan and the Beatles made rock and pop music center more on songwriter-performers. Frank Sinatra, Bing Crosby, and most of the other great singing stars who emerged before 1964 did not write much or any of their own material.The idea was that singers demonstrated their talent by wisely choosing songs and placing a unique vocal stamp on the material. There were some exceptions, such as Mel Tormé.

Likewise, even acts that performed with instruments on stage often did not play their own instruments on record but used studio musicians. The Beatles and other such bands largely ended that pattern after 1964.
Reply With Quote
  #78  
Old 06-28-2017, 11:51 AM
Spectre of Pithecanthropus Spectre of Pithecanthropus is offline
Charter Member
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Marmite Free Sector
Posts: 18,605
Quote:
Originally Posted by CBCD View Post
I used to think Elvis was a silly Vegas lounge act. I thought 'big deal' when he died. Now I think he was incredibly talented. I'm sorry he got drugged up and died so young.

3 things changed my opinion:

1. Emmylou Harris, whom I really respect, said wonderful things about him in an interview in Frets Magazine.

2. I watched his 'Comeback Special' and was blown away by his charismatic performances. Especially good is the segment where there is just Elvis, Scotty Moore, and 2 others sitting in a circle playing.

3. I listened closely to his singing and phrasing on All Shook Up. Wow! Listen to how he sings 'Well she touched my hand what a chill I got.'

Oh, and gosh, when he was young, was he ever handsome! What a smile. In case you think I'm some fanzine-reading cracker, I'm an opera fan with a degree in philosophy.
5. Another "quote" always sold me is the beginning of Heartbreak Hotel. Those who haven't listened to the record typically imagine that he sings it in a normal English cadence, something like:

Well SINCE my BA-by LEFT me...

But he doesn't do that. Instead he kills it by singing this:

WELL since MYYYY baby LEFT me...

And it amps uo the song's intensity by an order of magnitude. The first version, had Presley recorded it that way, might have given a young John Lennon some welcome relief from the bland BBC pop of the day. But the way he actually did sing it is like a shot of soul. It mourns your first break-up with pure intensity.





Sent from my SM-G900P using Tapatalk
__________________
Refusing to choose the lesser of two evils may be tantamount to choosing the greater.

Last edited by Spectre of Pithecanthropus; 06-28-2017 at 11:55 AM..
Reply With Quote
  #79  
Old 06-28-2017, 12:56 PM
Spectre of Pithecanthropus Spectre of Pithecanthropus is offline
Charter Member
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Marmite Free Sector
Posts: 18,605
Whoops. Unintended Monty Python reference, there.

Sent from my SM-G900P using Tapatalk
__________________
Refusing to choose the lesser of two evils may be tantamount to choosing the greater.
Reply With Quote
  #80  
Old 06-28-2017, 02:19 PM
spifflog spifflog is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Quote:
Originally Posted by astorian View Post
Story goes that, when the Beatles were introduced to Elvis, they were utterly starstruck, and for a change, even Lennon didn't have a single thing to say.

After a few seconds of that, Elvis sighed, "If y'all are just gonna stare at me all night, I'm going to bed."
I may be remembering this incorrectly, but when I watched the Beatles Anthology, I though the Beatles were initially impressed and starstruck with Elvis, but that quickly soured when they discovered that he didn't want to talk music, and wasn't as serious a musician as they were. I think the Beatles always wanted to be the best musicians that they could be, and the Elvis wanted to be the best performer.

Having said this, I love me the Elvis. I'm in the middle of the first volume of a biography on him - pretty fascinating.
Reply With Quote
  #81  
Old 06-28-2017, 02:30 PM
WordMan WordMan is online now
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 20,749
Quote:
Originally Posted by spifflog View Post
I'm in the middle of the first volume of a biography on him - pretty fascinating.
Last Train to Memphis by Peter Guralnick? Excellent book - I haven't read the second volume Careless Love because I know how crushing I'll find it. But that set is considered the definitive Elvis bio to date.
Reply With Quote
  #82  
Old 06-28-2017, 03:34 PM
WordMan WordMan is online now
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 20,749
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spectre of Pithecanthropus View Post
5. Another "quote" always sold me is the beginning of Heartbreak Hotel. Those who haven't listened to the record typically imagine that he sings it in a normal English cadence, something like:

Well SINCE my BA-by LEFT me...

But he doesn't do that. Instead he kills it by singing this:

WELL since MYYYY baby LEFT me...

And it amps uo the song's intensity by an order of magnitude. The first version, had Presley recorded it that way, might have given a young John Lennon some welcome relief from the bland BBC pop of the day. But the way he actually did sing it is like a shot of soul. It mourns your first break-up with pure intensity.
Nice. I hear it but wouldn't've called it out that thoughtfully.
Reply With Quote
  #83  
Old 06-28-2017, 05:10 PM
PunditLisa PunditLisa is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: 'burbs of Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 13,960
Quote:
Originally Posted by spifflog View Post
I may be remembering this incorrectly, but when I watched the Beatles Anthology, I though the Beatles were initially impressed and starstruck with Elvis, but that quickly soured when they discovered that he didn't want to talk music, and wasn't as serious a musician as they were. I think the Beatles always wanted to be the best musicians that they could be, and the Elvis wanted to be the best performer.
Here are various recollections of that night. None of them mention a souring of their opinion.

https://www.elvis.com.au/presley/elv...-beatles.shtml
Reply With Quote
  #84  
Old 06-28-2017, 06:47 PM
Marci Al Marci Al is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 191
Compare him with Jacko. If both sang the same romantic song to a girl in their respective styles, who do you think the girl will consider?
Reply With Quote
  #85  
Old 06-29-2017, 11:02 AM
spifflog spifflog is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Quote:
Originally Posted by PunditLisa View Post
Here are various recollections of that night. None of them mention a souring of their opinion.

https://www.elvis.com.au/presley/elv...-beatles.shtml
You're right. I didn't remember that correctly after all. Thanks for correcting that.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:07 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Send questions for Cecil Adams to: cecil@chicagoreader.com

Send comments about this website to: webmaster@straightdope.com

Terms of Use / Privacy Policy

Advertise on the Straight Dope!
(Your direct line to thousands of the smartest, hippest people on the planet, plus a few total dipsticks.)

Publishers - interested in subscribing to the Straight Dope?
Write to: sdsubscriptions@chicagoreader.com.

Copyright © 2017 Sun-Times Media, LLC.