The Straight Dope

Go Back   Straight Dope Message Board > Main > General Questions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-03-2002, 09:37 AM
Milossarian Milossarian is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
A baseball question for the meteorologists

The Detroit Tigers and Chicago White Sox tied the Major League Baseball record for most home runs hit in a game (12) on Tuesday. As noted in a story about the game:
Quote:
It was a muggy, 93-degree night -- the hot-and-humid conditions that are optimum for homers.
Anecdotally, I concur with the baseball writer. It does indeed seem, historically, that the home runs really start to fly when it becomes hot and humid.

But does that make any sense? Shouldn't more moisture in the air impede a baseball's flight?

A search didn't produce any league-wide statistics on home runs per month, unfortunately. Or any discussion on this topic.
Reply With Quote
Advertisements  
  #2  
Old 07-03-2002, 10:38 AM
Philster Philster is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
The issue is temperature: hot air is thinner.

In many major league cities, hot air is accompanied by humidity.

In some hot dry towns, they stay hot and dry so the stadium home run rate doesn't change.


Take a major city - Philly, NY, Balt, Chitown, Boston, Pitts, etc, etc....where temps change....temps go up and so does humidity...so humidity is dragged into the equation.

So, the REAL factor is hot air...which is less dense AND usually more still. And, it's even hotter in the stadium than outside.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-03-2002, 10:40 AM
Philster Philster is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
science says.....weather and baseball:

http://www.ampsc.com/~grussell/secre...rs/weather.htm
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-03-2002, 10:41 AM
Philster Philster is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
from the link above:


"...Even the humidity can add extra distance. Water vapor being slightly lighter than air, very humid conditions can also add a little something extra to the long ball hit to center field..."
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-03-2002, 10:55 AM
Philster Philster is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
charts!


http://www.exploratorium.edu/learnin...y2_sept97.html
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-03-2002, 11:23 AM
KneadToKnow KneadToKnow is offline
Voodoo Adult (Slight Return)
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Charlotte, NC, USA
Posts: 20,793
Props to Philster for answering the sh!t out of this question.
__________________
Did you see that ludicrous display last night?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-03-2002, 11:47 AM
Milossarian Milossarian is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Yeah, you da man, Philster.

Water vapor is slightly lighter than air? Who knew? (Uh, don't answer that. "Obviously not me" will suffice. )
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-03-2002, 11:55 AM
postcards postcards is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: The other Long Beach.
Posts: 3,059
So what does this say about the Rockies' plan to keep baseballs in a humidifier in order to keep the number of home runs from getting too high?

If the air is thinner because it's humid, shouldn't the balls, kept in the same atmosphere, be heavier with water vapor, thus cancelling out any advantage the (thinner) humid air would have?

Or am I way off-base here, and about to be picked off? (hey, I held the metaphor!)
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-03-2002, 12:16 PM
Philster Philster is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Humid balls: Well, they would be heavier if they absorb any moisture. Sounds perverted.

So, it would reason that they wouldn't travel as far.

Also, when whacked with a bat, some water would absord energy and dissipate energy (some even flying outta the ball with some energy that would otherwise stay in the ball), causing less energy to stay in the ball and less to drive it "outta here!"

Got that?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-03-2002, 12:17 PM
Philster Philster is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Humid balls post was answering "postcards" question about putting Rocky balls in a humidifier.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 07-03-2002, 02:54 PM
mazzer mazzer is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Postcards, huh? The air is drier in Denver.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 07-03-2002, 03:07 PM
Philster Philster is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Quote:
Originally posted by chriszarate
Postcards, huh? The air is drier in Denver.

ChrisZ,

in Denver, the overwhelming difference in the air density because of the altitude far outweighs any lack of humidity. As a matter of fact, stated in one of the links I posted on the science of all this (did you read them? Nooooo)....well it stated that the hitter's dream scenario would be:

Denver on a hot humid day.

Why? Well, start with thin air at high altitude and throw in some lighter than air water vapor (high humidity) and you have a hitters dream.


Have we killed this issue yet?
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 07-03-2002, 03:13 PM
KneadToKnow KneadToKnow is offline
Voodoo Adult (Slight Return)
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Charlotte, NC, USA
Posts: 20,793
Is a humidor automatically a humidifier? The former is what the Rockies were using. I thought that just maintained a constant humidity level, I didn't think it necessarily involved adding humidity.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 07-03-2002, 03:13 PM
Philster Philster is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
A recap!!!

For clarification: Hot air is thinner....plus humidity with lighter- than-air water vapor = balls going farther.

Another factor would be altitude which = even less resistance.

Dream = hot/humid/hi altitude. (see: Denver)

postcards the poster says something about putting the balls in a humidifier in Denver...to reduce the distance they travel.....
...which seems to make some sense, so see my post after his regarding that.

Whew.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 07-03-2002, 03:14 PM
Milossarian Milossarian is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Quote:
Have we killed this issue yet?

It could be .... it might be .... it is ...... GONE! OUTTA HERE!

Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 07-03-2002, 03:19 PM
mazzer mazzer is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Quote:
Originally posted by postcards
If the air is thinner because it's humid, shouldn't the balls, kept in the same atmosphere, be heavier with water vapor, thus cancelling out any advantage the (thinner) humid air would have?
Chill out, PHILster; I just misunderstood what my boy postcards (who I addressed by name) was saying. I thought he was implying the air in Denver is often humid ("If the air is thinner because it's humid ..."). Obviously, I was wrong. Thanks for jumping me.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 07-03-2002, 03:20 PM
Philster Philster is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Knead,

if the humidor keeps the balls a little more moist than the outside, then in some sense it's like a humidifier....and you don't usually put anything in a humidifier inasmuch as you humidify an area with one.

So, it makes sense what you are saying: that balls are placed in a humidor. Maybe the dry air makes the balls a little tough or brittle covered.

In any event, a humidor keeps a constant humidity level, probably high enough to keep things from drying out.....keeping them moist, more or less.

Take it to an extreme: a soggy ball is dead weight. Like a wet tennis ball. Now, a baseball is less exaggerated as an example, but it suffers from being 'wet'. Even mildly damp, it can't be as lively as a dry ball ( or one with ideal good humidity to provide a balance between water content and pliability/playability).
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 07-03-2002, 03:54 PM
Manduck Manduck is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: May 1999
Another consideration is that the pitcher should be able to get a better grip on a "humidified" ball.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:46 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Send questions for Cecil Adams to: cecil@chicagoreader.com

Send comments about this website to: webmaster@straightdope.com

Terms of Use / Privacy Policy

Advertise on the Straight Dope!
(Your direct line to thousands of the smartest, hippest people on the planet, plus a few total dipsticks.)

Publishers - interested in subscribing to the Straight Dope?
Write to: sdsubscriptions@chicagoreader.com.

Copyright © 2013 Sun-Times Media, LLC.