The Straight Dope

Go Back   Straight Dope Message Board > Main > About This Message Board

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-09-2000, 08:23 PM
Falcon Falcon is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: May 1999
In this thread: http://boards.straightdope.com/ubb/F...ML/000777.html Lynn has posted a link to the new rules. To repeat DB,
Quote:
**The Chicago Reader, Inc., also reserves the right to reveal your identity (or whatever information we know about you) in the event of a complaint or legal action arising from any message posted by you.** IIRC, this is the only thing that's new. I'm now very curious as to why this rule was added, in a GQ type of way. What legal bases are you covering with this one?
Just thought I would ask the question here, since Lynn suggested it might get answered quicker. Also, why have no other mods posted about the new rules?

------------------
Winner, SDMB's Biggest Chat Addict

"Only two things that'll soothe my soul - cold beer and remote control."
Reply With Quote
Advertisements  
  #2  
Old 03-09-2000, 10:33 PM
SoulFrost SoulFrost is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Nomadic
Posts: 1,634
Quote:
The Chicago Reader, Inc., also reserves the right to reveal your identity (or whatever information we know about you) in the event of a complaint....
New rule?

Ok...the legal thing I can understand, but under what circumstances would you release information when a complaint is filed?

If someone came to you and said "SoulFrost is a big meanie head!" I'm sure you wouldn't release my info, but what kinds of complaints are we talking about here?

Or does this maybe have something to do with the DoS attacks from a couple of weeks ago?

-David
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-09-2000, 11:11 PM
TubaDiva TubaDiva is offline
Mother's Little Helper
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: In the land of OO-bla-dee
Posts: 9,411
Actually, that's been in the agreement since early days.

THIS is the part that's new:

Quote:
Vandalism of the site through inappropriate use of HTML or other code is grounds for immediate banning. Vandals will be reported to their Internet services provider. In extreme cases we may refer site vandalism to the police. . .

One last thing. This message board allows us to selectively ban individual users, and to delete all postings by a particular screen name in a single operation. Please remember that you are our guest here, and that we must reserve the right to exclude you at our whim, for any or no reason whatsoever. By registering and using the board you acknowledge this right and agree to abide by our rules and to submit to their interpretation and enforcement by our moderators and editors.
These are all, unfortunately, necessary changes.

your humble TubaDiva
Administrator
The Straight Dope
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-10-2000, 01:15 AM
Little Nemo Little Nemo is online now
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Western New York
Posts: 47,854
Quote:
By registering and using the board you acknowledge this right and agree to abide by our rules and to submit to their interpretation and enforcement by our moderators and editors.
I'm hoping this particular "necessary change" wasn't directed at me.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-10-2000, 02:10 AM
Dr.Watson Dr.Watson is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Geez. A guy threatens to moon a troll a single time and ye start parachutin' lawyers in . . .


Actually, it looks less like a change than an explanation from here. I was under the impression that everyone with a brain understood that they were here at the sufferance of the host.


Dr. Watson
"Power intoxicates men. It is never voluntarily surrendered. It must be taken from them." -- James F. Byrnes
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-10-2000, 11:02 AM
Little Nemo Little Nemo is online now
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Western New York
Posts: 47,854
The reason I was worried is because I recently started a thread in which I questioned a moderator's decision to close another thread. My thread was then shut down and moved to the BBQ Pit, even though I said nothing worse than that I felt the first moderator "overreacted". I'm hoping that the language of the above telling us "to abide" and "to submit" does not mean we cannot even question the moderators' actions.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-10-2000, 11:14 AM
RTFirefly RTFirefly is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Maryland
Posts: 24,456
Not to worry, Nemo. We question the mods all the time around here; they seem to take it in stride. They're a good bunch - not uptight at all, as far as I can tell.

I'm not sure what the deal was with your specific thread, but I can't imagine any of the mods here closing a thread just because their judgment was questioned.

------------------
Enough of voting for the lesser of evils - vote Cthulhu 2000!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-10-2000, 11:25 AM
Lynn Bodoni Lynn Bodoni is offline
Creature of the Night
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 19,663
{{Actually, it looks less like a change than an explanation from here. I was under the impression that everyone with a brain understood that they were here at the sufferance of the host.}}

Well, the crucial clause is "with a brain". I'm sure that you can come up with several handles who appear to post without using any brain.

Yes, it's more of an explanation than a new rule.

Lynn
For the Straight Dope
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-11-2000, 12:01 AM
Arnold Winkelried Arnold Winkelried is offline
Charter Member
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Irvine, California, USA
Posts: 14,822
Quote:
Originally posted by SoulFrost:
If someone came to you and said "SoulFrost is a big meanie head!" I'm sure you wouldn't release my info, but what kinds of complaints are we talking about here?
How about "SoulFrost is a big poopie head!" I think that would warrant revealing your particulars.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-11-2000, 12:29 AM
Nickrz Nickrz is offline
Charter Member
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Wheaton IL USA
Posts: 2,034
Nemo - Rest your weary head. This rule change had nothing to do with your questioning my decision to close the money laundering thread. I had/have no problem at all with your inquiry or opinion on that particular policy.
~~~~~~
Nickrz
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:11 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Send questions for Cecil Adams to: cecil@chicagoreader.com

Send comments about this website to: webmaster@straightdope.com

Terms of Use / Privacy Policy

Advertise on the Straight Dope!
(Your direct line to thousands of the smartest, hippest people on the planet, plus a few total dipsticks.)

Publishers - interested in subscribing to the Straight Dope?
Write to: sdsubscriptions@chicagoreader.com.

Copyright © 2013 Sun-Times Media, LLC.