The Straight Dope

Go Back   Straight Dope Message Board > Main > Comments on Cecil's Columns/Staff Reports

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-30-1999, 08:46 PM
Guest
 
I would offer this possible term of <snicker> endearment?

" BRANDONYMS " ???

One word, has that catchy --nyms suffix. Ok, who do I see to copywright this so I can sue the next hapless fool who uses MY term in print? ( Gotta love the litigious world we inhabit...)

----- Jes kidding, I am not the sue-ing typer, I am just...the Typer type
Reply With Quote
Advertisements  
  #2  
Old 07-02-1999, 01:57 PM
Guest
 
I don't thing one can Copyright a term ... but you CAN Trademark it. ;-)

Incidentally, if a work IS Copyrightable, it is considered to be under Copyright from the moment it is recorded (pen to paper, brush to canvas, sampler to hard disk, etc.) all the way until 50 years after the Author dies, when it becomes Public Domain. Whether the work is registered in the Copyright Office or not.

(Before 1976, though, it was a little different. Back then, a Copyright lasted exactly 28 years, and was renewable one (1) time for an additional 28 years.)
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-03-1999, 03:13 PM
Guest
 
tracer, you are right about not being able to copyright a word (or phrase).

The Sonny Bono Copyright Extension law extended copyright. Where it used to say 50, it now says 70. Where it used to say 75, it now says 95, and where it used to say 100 it now says 120.

Have YOU ever seen a happy elephant?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-04-1999, 04:53 PM
Guest
 
I read in the news that the copyright on Gone with the Wind is due to expire either this year, or next . . . so just for example, would it be legal for someone, Halequin maybe, to put out a series of Rhett and Scarlett romance novels? Or to write a book where Rhett is cryogenically frozen, and comes back to life 500 from now? Are the characters and plotline free game?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-11-1999, 07:52 AM
Guest
 
Lissa, I don't kow about the characters ( although, I suspect they are protected intellectual property, much like my cerebral cortex). However, I am almost certain that the Civil War is not a trademarked event. It might be best to check with Ted Turner, just in case it is.



Typer The Yankee Quipper ( ROFL, Some days, I just find life gleeful. )
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-25-1999, 06:23 PM
Guest
 
I am an intellectual proprety researcher, so trademarks are my bread and butter. While I don't know that either of these terms are accepted, they do get bandied about the office in regards to genericide--we call'em "generecisms" or "generenyms". Every so often someone just calls'em "obsolete", but that's no fun.

------------------
maryjay
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-25-1999, 08:49 PM
Guest
 
Maryjay- try bandying " Brandonyms " around for a few days, see what it does for the ole co-workers
typer
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:42 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Send questions for Cecil Adams to: cecil@chicagoreader.com

Send comments about this website to: webmaster@straightdope.com

Terms of Use / Privacy Policy

Advertise on the Straight Dope!
(Your direct line to thousands of the smartest, hippest people on the planet, plus a few total dipsticks.)

Publishers - interested in subscribing to the Straight Dope?
Write to: sdsubscriptions@chicagoreader.com.

Copyright © 2013 Sun-Times Media, LLC.