Straight Dope Message Board > Main Exponential Functions and Population
 Register FAQ Calendar Mark Forums Read

#1
05-11-2003, 05:43 PM
 Kriss Guest Join Date: Nov 2000
Exponential Functions and Population

As part of my math homework I have to discuss why exponenetial functions are often useful for represnting the size of a population over time. Could someone help me UNDERSTAND why they are useful. As far as I know, they dont have a constant rate of change, just like population. Also, the more people you have, the more they multiply so with exponents, the bigger the number is, the more it will get bigger. Uhm..help?
#2
05-11-2003, 05:49 PM
 Achernar Guest Join Date: Aug 1999
What math class are you in? The best answer to this involves Calculus, but that's not very helpful if your class is Algebra.
#3
05-11-2003, 05:53 PM
 Kriss Guest Join Date: Nov 2000
I am in this course called IMP math III. I think it just scratches the surface of calculus if even that.
#4
05-11-2003, 07:24 PM
 Tyrrell McAllister Guest Join Date: Feb 2001
Exponential functions are useful for modeling population because they obey the recurrence relation

&fnof;(t) = c * &fnof;(t - 1),

where c is some constant. To give a concrete example, say &fnof;(t) = et, where e = 2.71828.... Then &fnof; obeys the recurrence relation

&fnof;(t) = e * &fnof;(t - 1).

Now, if we take t to be time, and take &fnof;(t) to be the number of individuals in a population at time t, then the recurrence relation above says that the number of individuals present at time t is always c times the number of individuals that were present one time-unit prior to time t.

And this matches how we'd expect populations to behave, at least under ideal conditions. Why? Because we expect that, on average, each individual has the same number of offspring each time-unit. Call that number n. So say we're at time t - 1, and each individual then has its allotment of n offspring. How many individuals do we have at time t? Well, there are the &fnof;(t - 1) individuals we had one time-unit ago, plus the n*&fnof;(t - 1) individuals that were born this last time-unit. So there are a total of (n + 1)*&fnof;(t - 1) individuals in the population at time t. In equations, we've just shown that

&fnof;(t) = (n + 1)*&fnof;(t - 1).

If we write c for (n + 1) we have exactly the recurrence relation above.
#5
05-11-2003, 08:22 PM
 desdinova Guest Join Date: Feb 2001
Here's one reason why exponential functions are necessary: they ensure you end up with a number that makes sense.

Day in, day out, I'm dealing with population changes in the course of my job. Frequently what I'm citing is the change in population between the 1990 and 2000 U.S. Census. For example, let's say "TownVille" had a population of 4,952 in 1990, and 7,413 in 2000. Any fool can calculate that there was a 49.7% increase in population between 1990 and 2000.

Unfortunately, the more common fool then figures "hey, that means there was a 4.97% annual increase between 1990 and 2000!" Nope. If you apply 4.97% to 1990, and then 4.97% to that figure for 1991, and so on, you do not end up with 7,413 in 2000. Of course, if you apply 4.97% to 4,952, and then only apply it to that 1990 count 10 times and add those numbers to 4,952, then you do come to the correct figure, but that's hardly how one would interpret "annual rate of change", now is it?

The correct answer is [(7,413/4,952)^0.1]-1, or 4.12%. This is the "annual growth rate" of TownVille as one would normally interpret it, and fundamentally it's calculated the same way one would calculate a compound interest rate. Nonetheless, I find myself explaining this concept at least weekly to very well-paid bankers that are convinced that I flunked high school algrebra...

So, the short answer is, exponential functions are useful because we tend to think that a population increases, say 4.12% in 1990, and then that larger population, that is 4.12% larger, then increases 4.12% of its new, larger size. This is how we typically think of population growth, and its the same way we traditionally calculate interest rates. At the end of the year, you want 3% interest on the amount you had in your bank account that year, not the amount you first put in 10 years ago, right?

 Bookmarks

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is Off HTML code is Off
 Forum Jump User Control Panel Private Messages Subscriptions Who's Online Search Forums Forums Home Main     About This Message Board     Comments on Cecil's Columns/Staff Reports     Straight Dope Chicago     General Questions     Great Debates     Elections     Cafe Society     The Game Room     In My Humble Opinion (IMHO)     Mundane Pointless Stuff I Must Share (MPSIMS)     Marketplace     The BBQ Pit Side Conversations     The Barn House

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:56 AM.