From today’s NY Times:
STORM LAKE, Iowa, Jan. 3 — Little by little, the Lord is seeping into Howard Dean’s presidential campaign. In South Carolina the other day, an invocation preceded the political speeches, and David Mack, a state legislator, closed the rally with “God bless you and keep you.” In Iowa last weekend, Dr. Dean referred to the New Testament. On Friday in New Hampshire, he invoked a Muslim phrase, “inshallah,” God willing, to make a point about Americans believing they control their destiny.
“I’m still learning a lot about faith and the South and how important it is,” Dr. Dean, the former governor of Vermont, said as he flew here, 150 miles northwest of Des Moines, Friday night on his chartered jet, predicting he would mention God more and more in the coming weeks. “It doesn’t make me more religious or less religious than I was before, but it means that I’m willing to talk about it in different ways.”
Dr. Dean recently told an audience in Iowa that he prayed daily. On the plane he declined to detail his prayer ritual but described how a 2002 trip to Israel deepened his understanding of the connections between Judaism and Christianity. He named Job as his favorite New Testament book, then later corrected himself, noting that it is in the Old Testament. “I’m a New Englander, so I’m not used to wearing religion on my sleeve and being as open about it,” he said. “I’m gradually getting more comfortable with talking about religion in ways that I did not talk about it before.”
The changes come amid concern from several corners about the stridently secular tone of his campaign so far. In contrast to his Democratic opponents, who frequently discuss their faith in public, not to mention the born-again incumbent, President Bush, Dr. Dean said plainly in an interview a couple of months back: “I don’t think that religion ought to be part of American policy.” A cover story in The New Republic last month, headlined “Howard Dean’s religion problem,” called him “one of the most secular candidates to run for president in modern history,” and suggested this would “mark him as culturally alien to much of the country.” A rash of columns followed with similar warnings, and voters have begun to inquire about the issue at town hall meetings.
–So, what about it? Is Dean a genuinely religious man who is just now speaking up, or a canny pol who realizes there is no way a secular candidate could be elected in this religion-obsessed country?
Would it be the better part of valour for an athiest or agnostic (I have no idea if Dean is either) to be honest, or to “play the game” and God it up, as Dean is doing?