From this story.
It seems that a certain sorority put a LOT of pressure on its memberships to donate blood so that their university would keep its record. To that end, the blood-drive coordinator sent an e-mail to the membership urging them to lie about their health status so they could donate. Tattoos or piercings? No new ones. Cold? Naw, it’s just allergies. Recent travel to Europe? Nope. And so forth.
It’s not bad enough that blood-donation policies discriminate against gays, eliminating a huge population of donors right there. It’s also not bad enough that blood-services agencies have a difficult enough time finding responsible donors.
Finally, and this is what’s got my blood boiling (Pun intended): Donated blood is intended for use in sick and injured people! Do any of these people stop to think about this? Great, fine, wonderful! The University of Missouri-Columbia looks wonderful when over 3,000 people give blood! How many of these units will be unusable because the donors lied? How many people will be denied blood because some twit thinks it’s okay to force people to donate? How much time and expense will the blood-services agency waste, collecting the blood of people who know their blood isn’t safe?
If there is any justice in the world, the sorority sisters should hold a fundraiser to make restitution to the Red Cross for their selfish, wasteful actions, along with community service to the RC.
Oh, and if I were the university, I’d definitely re-assess the literacy level of the blood-donation coordinator, Christie Key:
Robin