Yeeeaaaaccchhh!!!

I will not reply to the Aaarrrggghhh! thread.
<font size=-1>I will not reply to the Aaarrrggghhh! thread. </font>
<font size=-1 color=gray>I will not reply to the Aaarrrggghhh! thread.</font>
<font size=-2 color=gray>I will not reply to the Aaarrrggghhh! thread.</font>
<font size=-2 color=white>I will not reply to the Aaarrrggghhh! thread.</font>

-Quadell

I called my bookie, and he's giving me 40:1 against your staying off the Aaarrrggghhh! thread.
As much as I admire your resolve, I had to put down a C note.

I think 43:1 are the standard odds.

-Quadell

Now, about this gambling thing: I hope you guys have fun placing bets while you......
BURN IN HELL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
hahahahahahahahahahaha....

A five spot says hell doesn't exist.

After reading ARG220's posts, I have to admit that I have changed my mind about the existence of hell. It exists in any forum in which ARG220 decides to debate.

Slythe, I wish you'd spent that C note to hire a lady of the evening to seduce ARG220. He says hes a virgin and doesn't understand why anyone would prefer a heaven with sex than one without it. I think it would be an interesting experiment. You could open a whole new book on bets: Will ARG220s asexual religious views change once he experiences sex? Will he decide he has found something better to do with his time and disappear from the message board? Will he convert to LDS so that he can have sex after he dies? Will he forsake his superreligious beliefs in order to indulge in a life of rampant hedonism?

I think it would be pretty interesting to compare the 'before' and 'after' ARG.

------------------
sosumi

Ok, here's what I said:

Well, I'm not married, so I've never had sex. So it's not like I'd be
"giving up" sex. I have no idea what it's like to begin with.

OF COURSE I understand why people would want a heaven where you could have sex. Sheesh.

Coosa: I hope that whole post of yours was a joke. But in case it wasn't, let me tell you one thing: No amount of money will pursuade me to sleep with ANYONE before I'm married. Sex was designed by God to be used ONLY inside of marriage. And I'm PROUD to say that I'm a virgin, and that I've waited for my future wife. (Whoever she may be)

Adam

Are you sure about that, Thor? We will, after all, have weenie roasts and s'mores.

------------------
"We're gonna have lawyers here. It'll be a fun time."
--R.R.S.

ARG: Take Reading Comprehension 101 - I didn't mention offering you any money at all. As you have often complained of others twisting your words, perhaps you would care to read things carefully and refrain from doing the same?

Although the idea that anyone would offer you money to have sex is pretty funny. Don't think I know many guys with that big an ego!

------------------
sosumi

slythe, see the "Aaarrrggghhh!!!" thread. You just won $100! Although, I must commend quadell on his/her post. Well put! That makes twice today that you've impressed me!

Oops, my bad. Quadell actually replied to the "Hey, ARG! Over here!" thread, which can be argued to be a continuation of the "Aaarrrggghhh!!!" thread. Maybe you can get $50 out of it, slythe.

I wouldn't be a member of any hell that would accept someone like me.

I said:

Coosa: I hope that whole post of yours was a joke. But in case it
wasn't, let me tell you one thing: No amount of money will pursuade me
to sleep with ANYONE before I'm married. Sex was designed by God to be
used ONLY inside of marriage. And I'm PROUD to say that I'm a virgin,
and that I've waited for my future wife. (Whoever she may be)

In response to this, you say:

ARG: Take Reading Comprehension 101 - I didn't mention offering you any
money at all. As you have often complained of others twisting your
words, perhaps you would care to read things carefully and refrain from
doing the same?
Although the idea that anyone would offer you money to have sex is
pretty funny. Don't think I know many guys with that big an ego!

I don't think I need to say anything more. Except that we all know who's twisting who's words around here. Coosa, my point was that nothing could make me give up my virginity before marriage. It's too important to me. Do you understand now?

I just reread my post, and your post carefully. It seems that you simply misunderstood me. I meant that no amount of money spent on me, or for me, or on some lady of the night will change my mind about this subject. There we go, perfectly clear now.
Adam

Adam:

How old are you?



------------------
Stoidela

******Boycott shampoo! Demand REAL poo!******

For anybody who does not know how old I am, I'm 21 years old.

Adam

Actually, I admire the fact the ARG220 is sufficiently committed to his beliefs to refrain from having sex until after marriage, especially since he has managed to abstain for 21 years. (I had assumed, wrongly, from reading his posts that he was about 16.)

It has piqued my curiosity about one matter, though - ARG, what are your views on sex? Many of the people I know who have very strict views about sex outside marriage also believe that sex exists solely for the purpose of procreation. I am seriously interested in your beliefs/opinions.


------------------
sosumi

[qoute]Sorry, but I agree with Arg. Sex should only happen within a committed relationship.

I'm a fogey. [/quote]

As with religion, sex should be an individual choice and not something that someone forces their personal values and beliefs upon others.



------------------
&gt;^,,^&lt;
KITTEN

He who walk through airport door sideways going to Bangkok. - Confucius

Adam:

21? That explains it.

My prediction: you will either marry very soon, and probably badly, since you will be highly motivated by sexual need and desire, then after that is satisfied you will no doubt discover what a bad choice you made in the heat of the moment.

Or

You will turn into a raging psychopath.

Only time will tell. But I'm betting on the first. So common, so sad...



------------------
Stoidela

******Boycott shampoo! Demand REAL poo!******

Diane, it is so hard to get upset with you with that little Kitten thing in you message. But I agree with you too. It is a personal choice. I know first hand the damage of having sex too early, outside of a committed relationship. It really sucks when you do meet the right person and there is all of this shame and baggage.

I also married too young..at about Adam's age. Worst mistake of my life. But here is the problem: If you shouldn't get married until you are , say, 26-27, then you have to fight sexual urges for like 13 years. OUCH!

What is the answer? Painful abstinance or damging indulgence?

You assume that ndulgence is automatically damaging. It's not as though the only options are abstinance vs. total promiscuity!

jeez.



------------------
Stoidela

******Boycott shampoo! Demand REAL poo!******

Coosa says:

It has piqued my curiosity about one matter, though - ARG, what are your
views on sex? Many of the people I know who have very strict views about
sex outside marriage also believe that sex exists solely for the purpose
of procreation. I am seriously interested in your beliefs/opinions.

My vies on sex are that it is best used in marriage. Not only is it created for marriage, but it's the most healthy inside the marriage setting. (PLUS the fact that God says we are only to use it inside of marriage)

However, I do not believe that God created sex only for procreation. God created our bodies for pleasure. (I doubt anybody can deny this) If He wanted sex to be only for procreation, then He wouldn't have made it so pleasurable. So my philosophy is this: If you're not married, abstinence is the key. But if you ARE married, then by all means, go for it once a week and twice on Sundays.

Stoid says:

My prediction: you will either marry very soon, and probably badly,
since you will be highly motivated by sexual need and desire, then after
that is satisfied you will no doubt discover what a bad choice you made
in the heat of the moment.

Well, you seriously underestimate me Stoid. I've waited what...7, or 8 years and not had sex? (I didn't even start THINKING about it until I was around 13, or 14) Believe me, I can go another 8..15...20...50 years no problem. Unlike some people, I'm not DRIVEN by "sexual need and desire." I want to wait until I find the mate that God has chose for me. I want to love her unconditionaly, and pledge my life to her. THEN I can FULLY enjoy consumating my marriage. And it'll make waiting all the more sweet.

Adam

Coosa says:

It has piqued my curiosity about one matter, though - ARG, what are your
views on sex? Many of the people I know who have very strict views about
sex outside marriage also believe that sex exists solely for the purpose
of procreation. I am seriously interested in your beliefs/opinions.

My vies on sex are that it is best used in marriage. Not only is it created for marriage, but it's the most healthy inside the marriage setting. (PLUS the fact that God says we are only to use it inside of marriage)

However, I do not believe that God created sex only for procreation. God created our bodies for pleasure. (I doubt anybody can deny this) If He wanted sex to be only for procreation, then He wouldn't have made it so pleasurable. So my philosophy is this: If you're not married, abstinence is the key. But if you ARE married, then by all means, go for it once a week and twice on Sundays.

Stoid says:

My prediction: you will either marry very soon, and probably badly,
since you will be highly motivated by sexual need and desire, then after
that is satisfied you will no doubt discover what a bad choice you made
in the heat of the moment.

Well, you seriously underestimate me Stoid. I've waited what...7, or 8 years and not had sex? (I didn't even start THINKING about it until I was around 13, or 14) Believe me, I can go another 8..15...20...50 years no problem. Unlike some people, I'm not DRIVEN by "sexual need and desire." I want to wait until I find the mate that God has chose for me. I want to love her unconditionaly, and pledge my life to her. THEN I can FULLY enjoy consumating my marriage. And it'll make waiting all the more sweet.

Adam

Oops, sorry about the double post.

Aargh said:

Sex was designed by God to be used ONLY inside of marriage.

So who married Adam & Eve? Would it be valid without a witness?

Sorry- should be "ARG220 said:"

Sorry, but I agree with Arg. Sex should only happen within a committed relationship.

I'm a fogey.

Dear ARG, I'm glad to hear that you feel that way. It is a much more realistic view than some religions. But this raises another question in my mind - if yours is the only true religion, what is the position on people who were married in another faith? Or even not by a clergyman of any kind, but only a legal ceremony performed by a justice of the peace? Are these people enjoying sex within legitimate union, or are they sinners?


------------------
sosumi