The Straight Dope

Go Back   Straight Dope Message Board > Main > General Questions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-24-2004, 11:41 AM
Stainz Stainz is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Number of zeros in 1 billion - why different in UK than N.America?

On Jeopardy last night there was a question about how many zeros are in 1 billion in Great Britain.

I thought a billion = 1 thousand million.

One million has 6 zeros. 1,000,000.
One thousand has 3 zeros. 1,000.
One million x one thousand = 1 billion, with 9 zeros. 1,000,000,000.

But the correct answer on the show was 12.

Reply With Quote
Advertisements  
  #2  
Old 06-24-2004, 11:57 AM
Severian Severian is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 442
On dictionary.com they list as being chiefly British the definition in which a billion is one million millions.

Also: Million, Billion, Trillion...
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-24-2004, 11:58 AM
WotNot WotNot is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Northumbria
Posts: 2,223
This is correct: in the UK, a billion = 1 million million, hence 12 zeros.

Why? I dunno – just one of those things, I think. Like aluminum/aluminium, the UK standardised on one, the US on another.

Interestingly, we seem to be moving towards the thousand million definition. I seem to remember that several years ago, the Treasury announced that it would be switching to that definition for budgets.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-24-2004, 12:08 PM
Stainz Stainz is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Thanks ... amazing what one can learn from Jeopardy (and the Straight Dope!).

So ... in Britain, what do they call our billion? Is there a name for it, or would they call 3 billion "3 thousand million".

(I'm aware that in everyday conversation, the topic of billions rarely comes up, but I'm just curious.)



S.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-24-2004, 12:30 PM
Sunspace Sunspace is online now
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Back in the GT eeehhhh...
Posts: 24,941
Most often I've seen '1 000 000 000' in British publications as 'thousand million', but I think it could also be 'miliard' (which is I believe from French).
__________________
Rigardu, kaj vi ekvidos.
Look, and you will begin to see.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-24-2004, 01:08 PM
cckerberos cckerberos is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
It should probably be noted that the American usage is now widely used in the UK (or so I've read).
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-24-2004, 01:17 PM
Bippy the Beardless Bippy the Beardless is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
In UK physics the old Billion = Milion million is not used to avoid confusion with US publications. I hope Billion = Million million is obsolescent becoming obsolete in UK, as it makes pronouncing large numbers very confusing. I believe the confusion continues for higher numbers, UK trillion = milion million million = 1018 = US Quintillion.

See this site http://www.jimloy.com/math/billion.htm for more details.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-24-2004, 01:27 PM
pulykamell pulykamell is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: SW Side, Chicago
Posts: 25,364
It's not just the UK that uses 10^12 for "billion." So do French, Norweigian, Dutch, German, Spanish, Hungarian, Polish (and I presume most of the Slavic languages), just for a start.

In many of these countries, there are variations of "milliard" (which is also an English term), which are equivalent to the American billion, or 10^9.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-24-2004, 05:15 PM
Ximenean Ximenean is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bippy the Beardless
I hope Billion = Million million is obsolescent becoming obsolete in UK, as it makes pronouncing large numbers very confusing. I believe the confusion continues for higher numbers, UK trillion = milion million million = 1018 = US Quintillion.
Both those meanings are already obsolete in Britain, not that 'trillion' = 1018 ever got much use, I imagine. 'Billion', most often heard in financial contexts, always means 109. I can't remember ever encountering the old usage.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-25-2004, 08:42 AM
GorillaMan GorillaMan is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
I've never encountered the old usage, either, except in outdated text books Even in high school physics and maths, I never came across any confusion, and we had some awkward students (and teachers).
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 06-25-2004, 09:12 AM
Mk VII Mk VII is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: England
Posts: 2,024
it's the only example of something that is bigger in England than it is in America
But yes, 'billion' in the sense of 10 to the power of 12 seems to have been superceded by 10 to the power of 9, probably because it makes the speaker's number seem more impressive
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 06-25-2004, 09:12 AM
Mangetout Mangetout is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Kingdom of Butter
Posts: 47,511
For the average Joe listening to the news, none of this matters; any amount equal to or above ($/£)1000,000,000 might as well be described as 'a shitload' because it would take actual mental effort to visualise what the amount means, and that never happens.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 06-25-2004, 03:12 PM
Ludovic Ludovic is online now
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: The Black Parade is dead!
Posts: 21,605
I had wondered this a couple years ago, myself. I was watching, it may have been parliament, some speaker complaining that the government had spent something like "25 billion" on some social program in the past 10 years and hadnt gotten any benefit from it.

I immediately thought they meant a thousand million, but then I thought "wait, that can't be right. First of all, dont they use billion to mean a million million (which evidently they dont anymore.) Second, 2.5 billion would seem like nothing in most budgets )

On the other hand spending 25 million million on anything just seemed ridiculous. Thanks for clearing that up.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 06-26-2004, 12:29 AM
elfkin477 elfkin477 is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: NH
Posts: 18,607
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mk VII
it's the only example of something that is bigger in England than it is in America

Isn't there gallon larger too?
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 06-26-2004, 01:41 AM
legion legion is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Quote:
Originally Posted by elfkin477
Isn't there gallon larger too?
And our nobs. Don't forget our nobs are bigger too.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 06-26-2004, 05:09 AM
Enola Straight Enola Straight is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Somers Point, NJ
Posts: 4,778
I wonder how many milliardaires there are.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 06-27-2004, 06:37 AM
Mathochist Mathochist is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: New Orleans, LA
Posts: 3,031
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bippy the Beardless
I hope Billion = Million million is obsolescent becoming obsolete in UK, as it makes pronouncing large numbers very confusing. I believe the confusion continues for higher numbers, UK trillion = milion million million = 1018 = US Quintillion.
Yes, but it makes the whole system so much more sensible!

1 million = 106
1 billion = 1012
1 trillion = 1018
1 <prefix denoting n>llion = 106n

On the American system it's 103n+3. Ugh.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 06-27-2004, 06:40 AM
Mathochist Mathochist is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: New Orleans, LA
Posts: 3,031
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mangetout
For the average Joe listening to the news, none of this matters; any amount equal to or above ($/£)1000,000,000 might as well be described as 'a shitload' because it would take actual mental effort to visualise what the amount means, and that never happens.
Well, just because innumeracy is rampant and unchecked in our society doesn't mean the numerate should curb their discussions.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 06-27-2004, 05:28 PM
bonzer bonzer is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Quote:
Originally Posted by WotNot
I seem to remember that several years ago, the Treasury announced that it would be switching to that definition for budgets.
As of Harold Wilson's announcement as PM on December 20th 1974 that the Treasury would be using the American definition.
One influential newspaper's style guide evidently agrees with the consensus above. Along with such financial cases, the Guardian also uses the American definition for population figures and cosmological ages.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Send questions for Cecil Adams to: cecil@chicagoreader.com

Send comments about this website to: webmaster@straightdope.com

Terms of Use / Privacy Policy

Advertise on the Straight Dope!
(Your direct line to thousands of the smartest, hippest people on the planet, plus a few total dipsticks.)

Publishers - interested in subscribing to the Straight Dope?
Write to: sdsubscriptions@chicagoreader.com.

Copyright © 2013 Sun-Times Media, LLC.