The Straight Dope

Go Back   Straight Dope Message Board > Main > General Questions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-24-2004, 09:55 PM
Pentax Pentax is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Mercury Bullets

I've heard that if you put mercury in a bullet, the bullet will explode on impact. But this doesn''t make sense to me.

Leaving behind the "mercury forms alloy's at room temp easily", it seems that just putting mercury in a bullet won't make it explode because:
  • When it hits the target wouldn't the mercury squirt out the back of the bullet?
  • Or when it hits, the mercury would squirt out the sides, because it is a liquid, and so would not hold it's shape enough to penetrate a body to a great degree

So is the mercury bullet exploding thing an Urban legend (I googled mercury bullet site:www.straightdope.com and got nothing, and I'm looking through snopes (search: mercury bullet = no matches), but haven't found anything yet, so any help on the mercury bullet would be nice)

Thanks
Reply With Quote
Advertisements  
  #2  
Old 07-24-2004, 10:15 PM
Call me Frank Call me Frank is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
What you are describing are fulminated mercury tips. Apparently, fulminated mercury is a shock-sensitive material that will explode when impacted.

That having been said, I've only heard of that from a Law and Order episode, and couldn't dig up any cites for actual fulminated mercury-tipped bullets.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-24-2004, 10:33 PM
Ranchoth Ranchoth is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Hinckley uses explosive bullets in his attack on Reagan.

I seem to remember that explosive bullets usually don't work very well in practice, though.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-24-2004, 11:09 PM
MrFantsyPants MrFantsyPants is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
From what I remember (no time to look for a cite) a cavity in the bullet contains some mercury, some air. On impact the mercury hits the front of the cavity with enough force to vaporize, making it explode.

Never tried it, just recounting a vague recollection.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-24-2004, 11:29 PM
Tuckerfan Tuckerfan is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
A buddy of mine in high school tried this, and was sorely disappointed with the results. He was using a .44 with hollow points, IIRC. According to him, the mercury never made it to the target, it being vaporized when the bullet was fired.
__________________
***Don't ask me, I don't post here any more, and I'm probably not even reading this now.***
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-24-2004, 11:41 PM
wolf_meister wolf_meister is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Where the owls say "Whom"
Posts: 5,403
From what I've heard, a bullet filled partially with liquid mercury produces violent shockwaves on impact.

1) The mercury-filled bullet would pack a bit more wallop because mercury has a specific gravity of 13.55 compared to 11.3 for lead.

2) Mercury, being a liquid, would splatter on impact as opposed to the lead which would remain solid. This is vaguely analagous to a hollow-point bullet but now instead you have a "liquid-point" bullet.

3) Supposedly, "hit-men" use these because mercury-filled bullets undergo incredible deformation upon impact making (I believe) ballistic tests impossible.

Remember I was talking about mercury (the element) and not mercury fulminate.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-24-2004, 11:55 PM
Oat1957 Oat1957 is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Mercury tipped rounds have a channel drilled in them that is filled with mercury, then capped. When the bullet hits a target, the round literally explodes as the mercury is compressed and ruptures the lead.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-25-2004, 12:01 AM
Boyo Jim Boyo Jim is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 30,876
Wasn't it mercury-filled bullets in the book version of The Day of the Jackal?*

IIRC, you drill a relatively deep, narrow hole in the lead, partially fill the whole with mercury, and then tap some more lead on top to seal whole. When the bullet is fired, the mercury builds up in the rear of the bullet, at impact the mercury is flung forward and pops off the lead cap, and little driblets of both go scattering through the target tissue.

The mercury was never intended to explode, in a chemical sense.

*IANAL chemist, weapons expert, just someone who's read hundreds of spy novels and have trouble distinguishing fact from fiction, and sometimes which book they came from.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-25-2004, 11:38 AM
Unregistered Bull Unregistered Bull is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Doesn't work

The lead absorbs the mercury. Doing Google search of rec.guns will get you all kinds of particulars.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-25-2004, 12:10 PM
RM Mentock RM Mentock is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Quote:
Originally Posted by Machetero
The lead absorbs the mercury.
That would take some time, wouldn't it?

My brother tried this forty years ago after reading the book. I seem to recall that the results weren't horrible, but he didn't pursue it after that.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 07-25-2004, 12:49 PM
Dog80 Dog80 is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
In order to inflict maximum damage to your target, your bullets need a balance between penetration and expansion. Too much expansion results to minimal penetration, ie a surface wound. Too little expansion and the bullet will go right through flesh, doing little damage.
I don't see how mercury bullets do more damage.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 07-25-2004, 01:44 PM
RM Mentock RM Mentock is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dog80
I don't see how mercury bullets do more damage.
"But the middle bullet was just right!"
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 07-25-2004, 03:35 PM
Pushkin Pushkin is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boyo Jim
Wasn't it mercury-filled bullets in the book version of The Day of the Jackal?
I was going to mention that very book.

In a small hollow inside the bullet the mercury rest and is held at the back of the bullet by the acceleration of firing, then carries forward when the deceleration of impact occurs and expands out the front of the bullet.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 07-25-2004, 09:38 PM
Mr. Roboto Mr. Roboto is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
in the movie version of, "Day of the Jackel"....

the assasin practices by firing at a melon hanging from a branch,on impact, the
melon is motionless...

he then inserts a mercury bullet, fires and the melon explodes to smithereens
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 07-25-2004, 11:07 PM
CalMeacham CalMeacham is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: May 2000
Frederick Forsyth describes the manufacture of mercury bullets in the book Day of the Jackal at some length. I'm ot an arms specoialist, but it seemed pretty convincing. He was a journalist, so you'd think he got his facs straight. On the other hand, I am an optics guy, and I know thathe really messed up the explanation of image-intensifier tubes in another book. So maybe he just has a convincing manner. The book and the movie imply that you can make these with glycerine, as well.

The bullet used in DOTJ has a hole drilled in it, a drop of mercury placed in it, and it's then re-sealed with lead and the shape re-constructed. The explanation Forsyth gives is that, upo impact, he mercury is thrown forward and rips the tip of the bullet apart, and the shrapnel continues to tear apart whatever body part it hit.

My question is: Why doesn't the same thing happen when the bullet is accelerated when the gun is fired? Wouldn't the same inertia tend to tear the [i]back[/i[] of the bullet apart? (Even if the gases propel mercury and all forward, and even if the casing helps hold it together, it seems to me the bullet would be fragmented , the mercury gone from the compartment, so that when the bullet finally it degaulle's head (or whatever target) it wouldn't be able to explode.


A later movie (not by Forsyth), The Exterminator, showed the killer manufacturing such bullets in what looked even to my untrained eyes like a very dangerous and stupid procedure, but evidently trying to do it as described in Forsyth's book. I'd be willing to bet the screenwriter read DOTJ.


No fulminate is involved in any of the above. The "explosion" is a purely mechanical effect.

In he case of Hunckley's assault on Reagan, it's my understanding that he used azide bullets, which are explosive due to a chemical effect (although not the same as fulminate).
__________________
"My name is Michael Jackson, King of Pop
Look on my works, Ye Mighty, and Despair!"
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 07-25-2004, 11:36 PM
Boyo Jim Boyo Jim is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 30,876
I don't know what the length of the shell was, but I imagine you could driill the hole so the lead at the rear is a doozen or more times thicker than the nose cap. If the lead slug is half an inch long, you drill the hole a quarter inch deep, and the noe cap is a tapped-on thiryseconth of an inch.

I'm only using these numbers as examples, I have no idea what the true proportions should be, assuming the idea works at all. But it would explain conceptually why the rear of the bullet could absorb the impact of mercury non-destructively.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 07-26-2004, 12:52 AM
BoringDad BoringDad is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Quote:
Originally Posted by CalMeacham
Frederick Forsyth describes the manufacture of mercury bullets in the book Day of the Jackal at some length. I'm not an arms specialist, but it seemed pretty convincing. He was a journalist, so you'd think he got his facts straight. On the other hand, I am an optics guy, and I know that he really messed up the explanation of image-intensifier tubes in another book. So maybe he just has a convincing manner.
HAAHAAAAHAAA!!! Journalist used in same sentence as "get facts straight" when dealing with a technical topic. That's mighty funny, especially given your doubt in the next sentence. I vote for convincing manner. That's why he gets paid to write!

Hence convieniently making the whole argument about mercury filled bullets moot, unless someone has a cite about them REALLY being used.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 07-26-2004, 01:49 AM
KP KP is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
I read DotJ as a child and I was highly skeptical because the difference in mass due to the relatively modest difference in density would be in the milligrams, not grams, for the method of construction described, this puts a real limit on the force. As a young adult, I was into "reloading" which includes casting bullets, and that confirmed my suspicion even a molten plug would probably come out relatively cleanly, rather than passing enough force to the surrounding slug to shatter it. A nonmolten plug definitely would

If you made a more substantial cavity in the bullet, you'd weaken the walls, which might assist the deformation on impact and help the plug adhere to the walls. This thin-wall might be supported by the barrel during firing, but not during impact, but you'd have to work a delicate balance. Is that possible for a professional assassin who is willing to do substantial experimentation in advance with a specific bullet and load? Maybe, but I think it would still be risky and iffy --and probably still wouldn't yield sufficient force for the desired result

I hope some metallurgist can comment on the miscibility or amalgamation of liquid lead and mercury, which was something I never got aroung to looking up. If mercury amalgams with lead as it doeas with many other metals, the difference in density would be reduced. I don't know what the properties of the amalgam would be. It might fragment easily.

Still, as others have noted, the fact that this is not used by our professional sniper forces, whose ammunition is all handmade, and who grasp at any advantage, strongly militates against it being effective.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Send questions for Cecil Adams to: cecil@chicagoreader.com

Send comments about this website to: webmaster@straightdope.com

Terms of Use / Privacy Policy

Advertise on the Straight Dope!
(Your direct line to thousands of the smartest, hippest people on the planet, plus a few total dipsticks.)

Publishers - interested in subscribing to the Straight Dope?
Write to: sdsubscriptions@chicagoreader.com.

Copyright 2013 Sun-Times Media, LLC.