Who should the Democrats choose for national party chair?

On February 12, 2005, the Democratic National Committee will meet in Washington to elect someone to succeed Terry McAuliffe as national party chair.

At present, there are seven declared candidates:

Howard Dean, former governor of Vermont, former contender for the Democratic presidential nomination in 2004, founder of Democracy for America, http://www.democracyforamerica.com/.

Wellington Webb, former mayor of Denver.

Martin Frost, former U.S. representative from Texas.

Donnie Fowler, Democratic strategist.

Tim Roemer, former U.S. representative from Indiana.

David Leland, former chair of the Ohio Democratic Party.

Simon Rosenberg, head of the New Democrat Network, http://www.newdem.org/.

These candidates are currently touring the South to drum up support. See http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory?id=397248&CMP=OTC-RSSFeeds0312.

From Kansas Democratic Party blog, impressions formed by msimpson, based on meeting declared candidates for DNC Chair at the Association of State Democratic Chairs meeting in Orlando in December, 2004, http://www.ksdp.org/?q=node/view/609:

Ickes and Kirk have since pulled out of the race. http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&u=/ap/20050105/ap_on_el_ge/democrats_chair So has Blanchard. And Roemer and Leland have jumped on the bandwagon.

Who should the Democrats elect?

Personally, I like Frost. His experience with the DCCC as well as his chairmanship of the Democratic Caucus gives him the experience to organize and lead the party. Plus, he’s centrist, and the party needs to convince the center, and he has a good record on defense issues, which will make it harder for the Republicans to accuse the party of being weak on defense and national security.

I’ve never understood what the duties of this post entailed. What is the Chairman supposed to do? Anyone want to give a brief tutorial?

Howard Dean

Dean or Rosenberg would get my attention (as an independent). This would be a signal to me that the Dems are into reform. Anyone else would be a sign of SOS, or more of the same, if you will. Boring and ineffective, IMHO.

Actually, Rosenberg is kind of boring too. But I’d give him a listen. It’s more about what faction of the party takes hold…

Is anyone going to give John Mace a run-down of inter-party interests, or will I have to attempt it? Let the better qualified Democratic man or woman step forward…

I would assume it’s the same kind of job as chair of the Republican National Committee.

From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Democratic_Party#Factions_of_the_Democratic_Party:

All well and good, BG, but that’s a little too dry. Tell about the rabbits, George… I mean, tell about the DLC, if you can, or wish to…

John, take it FWIW, but I am anti-DLC. This is when I put practical realities aside and vote third party (on the federal level). Perhaps not the same third party as you would choose, but still…

I think a better question - for Dems in particular - is why Howard Dean is seen as such a threat? Why is he considered an outsider? I mean, he’s not even a true leftist. He’s fiscally conservative (or fiscally responsible, if you’re into Dem framing) Why is he considered so dangerous? And what do the Dems really stand for, if they consider Dean dangerous? That’s what I’d like to know…

What about that libertarian bent you keep talking about? :slight_smile:

Seems like the party chair says more about which faction has the power than anything else. I also suspect that one of the biggest roles is the public face the person gives the party during the presidential election. I saw an LOT of both guys this time around on all the cable news channels.

I don’t know how things are where you are, but when I checked out the Libertarian Party around here (NYC) I wasn’t too impressed.

Quite so. And what did you think of Terry McAuliffe? That’s DLC…

They can be pretty kooky.

He came off as a partisan hack, just like his Republican counterpart. I guess that shouldn’t be such a surprise. :slight_smile: Both parties need someone who fights like a bulldog behind the scenes, but puts on a likeable face in public. I don’t think either of them did very well in the latter role. Fast-taking hucksters, the both of them.

Tell me about it.

I hate to generalise, but here they consist of men who love guns a little too much (for my taste), cheapskates, and moody loners. Not the ideals I had in mind, and not very attractive in general. But for me, it’s (libertarianism) more of a personal philosophy than a political party.

That’s why I like Dean for DNC chair. I like bulldogs, of any stripe, if they’re sincere. Can’t judge his likeable qualities, outside the northeast. To me he comes across as real, agree with him or not.

But the Dems are continuing their “strategy sessions”. Politics over principles. Hacks over wonks. How that’s any different from the GOP is beyond me…

They might want to get a new name for Southern liberal and moderate Democrats so that we aren’t written off again with that broad brush filled with red paint.

Nashville and many other areas of the South voted Blue.

Gen. Wesley Clark has shown some interest in the job and might be able to coax the South back to life.

Yankee :D.

Since Dennis Kucinich isn’t in the running, I’d have to back Howard Dean. He’s no socialist, not even by Kucinich standards, but he’ll do until one comes along. The Democratic Party has been on the wrong track ever since the corporate-liberal DLC wing rose to dominance. Let’s stop fretting about appealing to the “center” and build a party that offers a real alternative to the Pubs! I mean an economic alternative, not just a social-policy alternative! Let’s be the party that fights corporate power! Maybe then the poor and the working poor would start voting again! :slight_smile:

(And right after that, purple monkeys will fly out of Bush’s ass and drop by to clean my bathroom.)

Update: Yesterday the candidates for DNC chair stumped at the National Conference of Democratic Mayors in Washington. From http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/news/archive/2005/01/18/national2134EST0780.DTL:

The DLC is running scared. Good! I am watching this carefully, as are many “left-of-so-called-centrist” Democrats and Independents.

Roemer and Frost v. Dean and Rosenberg. The future of the Democratic Party is at stake. Who will prevail?

If anyone’s interested in how the rather complicated election process for DNC chair works, Rosenberg has posted an explanation on his campaign site: http://64.78.28.17/blog/archives/2005/01/how_the_process.html

See also http://www.swingstateproject.com/2004/12/dnc_chair_elect.html.

Fight it out in a caged deathmatch?

-XT

I often think the problems of the world could just as easily be solved under those conditions.

Is it ever a anything more than might makes right?

If it is, I guess I missed it.

Well, I don’t know…but it sure would be fun to watch. My money would be on Dean…he looks pretty tough and has some big arms from what I could see. And that crazy glint in his eye spells trouble for his opponent…

-XT