…I mean, like if we ever go to war with North Korea. I’m just wondering if “Nork” (from NORth Korean. And no, I didn’t make it up myself.) would be a socially acceptible nickname (Like “Charlie” or “Yank,” and whatnot) or if it’d be considered really racist and offensive.
I wouldn’t think it’s be a bad word, but I’m not the best judge of these kind of things.
And…now that I think about it, I’m not real entirely sure that this is even a proper GQ. :smack:
But…can anyone shed some light on the subject, for me?
I’ve seen it in a few places (VERY few places) online. Most notably, the famed Racial Slur Database.
It seems like a perfectly useful slur/nickname, but I just didn’t know if one’d be able to say it while in the U.S. without sounding like a racist.
(And yes, I’m aware of the irony of it being acceptible to wage war and kill people, but offensive to mock your enemy’s ethnicity. Hey, I don’t make the rules, I just try to live with them.)
Not really. While I am against both, war sometimes serves a worthwhile cause whereas dehumanizing someone doesn’t except, as someone mentioned, to make it easier to hurt, kill, or otherwise think less of them.
There’s nothing offensive about the name. It’s like calling a North Dakotan a Nodak.
In fact I will refer to the North Koreans only as Norks from now own.
It is written.
BTW in the game Mercenaries that just came out, you fight the North Koreans a lot. In the heat of battle I tend to call them the VC for some bizarre reason. I can now call them Norks.